DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20182846

ACDC: a simple app for abdominal wall closure data collection

Reena Kothari, Prachir Mukati, Dhananjaya Sharma

Abstract


Background: With the aims of getting evidence-based guidelines and decision making, well supported by strong, high quality data. We have developed an easy surgeon friendly mobile app which can be customized to the need by just decoding it.

Methods: We have use this app to analyze the outcomes of midline rectus sheath closure with different techniques and different sutures in terms of SSI, wound dehiscence, suture knot granuloma, burst abdomen and incisional hernia(IH). All the details regarding patient’s demographic status, surgical technique, suture used and follow up were recorded in the form of EDC (Electronic Data Collection) with the mobile app.

Results: Total 595 cases with mean age 48 years underwent midline closure. The most preferred technique was continuous running technique with polypropylene suture (54.1%) followed by herringbone technique with polypropylene suture (27.7%), continuous running technique with polyglactin suture (18. 2%).The incidence of IH was 4.05% with continuous running technique with polypropylene suture. The data of desired variables can be accessed easily just by few clicks.

Conclusions: This mobile app is reliable, fast, cost effective, and generates a credible and valid data along with the basic statistical analysis.


Keywords


EDC mobile app, Mobile app for surgeons, Techniques of midline closure, Rectus sheath closure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berger C, Freitas R, Malafaia O, Pinto JS, Mocellin M, Macedo E, et al. Electronic data collection for the analysis of surgical maneuvers on patients submitted to rhinoplasty. International archives otorhinolaryngology. 2012 Dec;16(4):497-501.

Information technology-Database languages-SQL-Part 1: Framework (SQL/Framework). ISO/IEC; 2016;9075-1.

Kothari R, Thakur R, Sharma D, Agrawal P. Herring bone stitch: from knitting to secure abdominal wall closure. J of Sur Resear. under communication.

National Strategy for e-Health Sweden. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2008 Avialable at: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/06/44/38/f6405a1c.pdf.

Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky SE. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Asso. 2003 Mar 1;10(2):139-49.

Ruland CM. Healthcare Informatics. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur; 2002.

Kline JA, Johnson CL, Webb WB, Runyon MS. Prospective study of clinician-entered research data in the emergency department using an Internet-based system after the HIPAA Privacy Rule. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2004 Dec;4(1):17.

Augenstein VA, Colavita PD, Wormer BA, Walters AL, Bradley JF, Lincourt AE, et al. CeDAR: Carolinas equation for determining associated risks. J American Coll Surg. 2015 Oct 1;221(4):S65-6.

European Hernia Society. Available at: www.Eura HS. Accessed on 24-01-2018.

Black N. High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers. 1999 Apr 10;353(9160):1205-6. The Lancet.

Thriemer K, Ley B, Ame SM, Puri MK, Hashim R, Chang NY, Salim LA, et al. Replacing paper data collection forms with electronic data entry in the field: findings from a study of community-acquired bloodstream infections in Pemba, Zanzibar. BMC research notes. 2012 Dec;5(1):113.

Pedro VS, Phillip K, Harshna VV, Brian BG. Medical registry data collection efficiency: a crossover study comparing web-based electronic data capture and a standard spreadsheet. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun;18(6):e141.

Lal SO, Smith FW, Davis JP, Castro HY, Smith DW, Chinkes DL, Barrow RE. Palm computer demonstrates a fast and accurate means of burn data collection. J Burn Care Rehabilitation. 2000 Nov 1;21(6):559-61.

Quinn P, Goka J, Richardson H. Assessment of an electronic daily diary in patients with overactive bladder. BJU international. 2003 May 1;91(7):647-52.

Helms RW. Data quality issues in electronic data capture. Drug information J. 2001 Jul;35(3):827-37.

Yu P, de Courten M, Pan E, Galea G, Pryor J. The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009 Aug;78(8):532-42.

Bart T. Comparison of electronic data capture with paper data collection. Business briefing: Pharmatech, 2003 Available at: http://www.dreamslab.it/doc/eclinica.pdf.

Tiplady B, Crompton GK, Dewar MH, Bollert FGE, Matusiewicz SP, Campbell LM, et al. The use of electronic diaries in respiratory studies. Drug Inf J. 1997;31:759e64.

Nyholm D, Kowalski J, Aquilonius SM. Wireless real-time electronic data capture for self-assessment of motor function and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Dis. 2004;19:446e51.