DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20214733
Published: 2021-11-26

Indian consensus on durability of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes management and role of oral antidiabetic drugs

Manoj Chawla, Pramila Kalra, A. K. Khanna, Sisir Kumar Mahapatro

Abstract


The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in an alarming way in India as well as across the globe. In order to minimize complications, there is a need to maintain good glycemic control in patients with T2DM and long-term durable glycemic control remains a challenge. Clinically, this challenge was addressed by step-wise intensification of therapy with additional antidiabetic drugs to maintain glycemic control. Various disease and patient-related factors as well as different antidiabetic agents influenced the durability of glycemic control differently. While understanding of the factors that influenced therapeutic outcomes had evolved, there was paucity of information about the durability of glycemic control and the role of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in achieving it. With an objective to understand the role of durability of glycemic response in the management of Indian patients with T2DM, 4 advisory board meetings attended by 48 physicians from across the country were conducted in Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru. There was consensus to consider durability of glycemic control as an important goal in the management of T2DM. Personalized approach in T2DM management along with early initiation of dual combination therapy were recommended to achieve durability. Age group of patients, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin levels at diagnosis, presence or absence of comorbidities and complications are important factors that need to be considered before initiating dual combination therapy for patients with T2DM.


Keywords


Diabetes mellitus, Durability of glycemic control, Metformin, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Full Text:

PDF

References


International Diabetes Federation. Fact sheet: Diabetes Atlas. 8th edition, 2018. Available at: https://www.idf.org/our-network/regions-members/south-east-asia/members/94-india.html. Accessed on 28 November 2020.

Joshi SR. Diabetes care in India. Ann Glob Health. 2015;81(6):830-8.

Davidson JA, Parkin CG. Is hyperglycemia a causal factor in cardiovascular disease? Does proving this relationship really matter? Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):331-3.

Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405-12.

Stringer F, DeJongh J, Enya K, Koumura E, Danhof M, Kaku K. Evaluation of the long-term durability and glycemic control of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin for pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(3):215-23.

Kim KJ, Choi JH, Kim KJ, An JH, Kim HY, Kim SG, et al. Determinants of long-term durable glycemic control in new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2017;41(4):284-95.

DelPrato S, Foley JE, Kothny W, Kozlovski P, Stumvoll M, Paldánius PM, et al. Study to determine the durability of glycaemic control with early treatment with a vildagliptin-metformin combination regimen vs standard‐of‐care metformin monotherapy-the VERIFY trial: a randomized double‐blind trial. Diabet Med. 2014;31(10):1178-84.

Ku EJ, Jung KY, Kim YJ, Kim KM, Moon JH, Choi SH, et al. Four-year durability of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes in clinical practice; COSMIC study. PloS One. 2015;10(6):0129477.

Serdy S, Abrahamson MJ. Durability of glycemic control: a feature of the thiazolidinediones. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004;6(2):179-89.

Derosa G, Sibilla S. Optimizing combination treatment in the management of type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(5):665-71.

Testa R, Bonfigli AR, Prattichizzo F, LaSala L, DeNigris V, Ceriello A. The “metabolic memory” theory and the early treatment of hyperglycemia in prevention of diabetic complications. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):437.

Paul SK, Klein K, Thorsted BL, Wolden ML, Khunti K. Delay in treatment intensification increases the risks of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:100.

American diabetes association. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:61-70.

ICMR. Fact sheet: ICMR guidelines for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 2018. Available at: https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/ICMR_GuidelinesType2diabetes2018_0.pdf. Accessed on 7 February 2021.

Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm-2018 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2018;24(1):91-121.

Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669-701.

Mahabaleshwarkar R, Gohs F, Mulder H, Wilkins N, DeSantis A, Anderson WE, et al. Patient and provider factors affecting clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy. Clin Ther. 2017;39(8):1658-70.

UK prospective diabetes study group. UK prospective diabetes study 16: overview of 6 years' therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes. 1995;44(11):1249-58.

Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, et al. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. New Eng J Med. 2006;355(23):2427-43.

Kahn SE, Lachin JM, Zinman B, Haffner SM, Aftring RP, Paul G, et al. Effects of rosiglitazone, glyburide, and metformin on β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in ADOPT. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1552-60.

Nauck MA, DelPrato S, Duran‐Garcia S, Rohwedder K, Langkilde AM, Sugg J, et al. Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add‐on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(11):1111-20.

Esposito K, Chiodini P, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Capuano A, Giugliano D. Glycaemic durability with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):005442.

Chen K, Kang D, Yu M, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Chen G, et al. Direct head‐to‐head comparison of glycaemic durability of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis of long‐term randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(4):1029-33.

Matthews DR, Paldánius PM, Proot P, Chiang Y, Stumvoll M, DelPrato S, et al. Glycaemic durability of an early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus sequential metformin monotherapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (VERIFY): a 5-year, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10208):1519-29.

Mir SR, Bhat MH, Misgar RA, Bashir MI, Wani AI, Malik HI. Prevalence of microalbuminuria in newly diagnosed T2DM patients attending a tertiary care hospital in North India and its association with various risk factors. J Contemporary Med Res. 2019;6(4):9-13.

Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:759-63.