Comparison of dosimetry in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy


  • Yashaswini B. R. Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Care Global Enterprises Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Kumara Swamy Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Care Global Enterprises Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India



Conformity index, Head and neck carcinoma, Homogeneity index, IMRT, OAR, PTV, Tomotherapy


Background: This study was conducted to compare dosimetric parameters and dose to specific organs at risk (spinal cord and parotids) between intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).

Methods: Thirty patients with histologically proven HNSCC were treated with chemo radiotherapy, to a dose of 60-70 Gray in 30-35 fractions. This study consists of two arms; IMRT arm and tomotherapy arm. Fifteen consecutive patients treated under IMRT and 15 patients were treated under helical tomotherapy, along with concurrent chemotherapy. PTV1 encompasses low risk planning target volume (PTV) which receives 50 Gy; PTV2 encompasses intermediate risk PTV which receives 54-60 Gy and PTV3 encompasses high risk PTV which receives 66-70 Gy. After completion of planning, dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and targets, homogeneity index and conformity index were evaluated, and tabulated.

Results: On evaluation of plans we found that V95% in PTV1, PTV2 and PTV3 were 91.82%, 96.85% and 90.67% respectively for IMRT and 99.25%, 99.68% and 99.73% respectively for tomotherapy. For PTV3, V110% was 0.11% for IMRT and 0.01% for tomotherapy. Homogeneity index in IMRT arm was 0.285 and it was 0.206 in tomotherapy arm. Conformity index was found to be 1.04 for IMRT plans and 1.06 for tomotherapy plans. When mean dose to contra lateral parotids was evaluated, it was 26.91 Gy in IMRT arm and 25.97 Gy in tomotherapy arm. Max dose to spinal cord was better in tomotherapy (43.07 Gy in IMRT and 34.41 Gy in tomotherapy).

Conclusions: There was statistically significant reduction in spinal cord maximum dose and point doses in tomotherapy plans compared to IMRT plans. The decrease in spinal cord dose can increase the tolerance reserve which can be useful in dose escalation or re-irradiation if required. There was also decrease in contra lateral parotid doses (not statistically significant). There was significant improvement in V95% in tomotherapy arm compared to IMRT arm, indicating the significantly superior coverage of target volumes in helical tomotherapy plans compared to IMRT plans. V110% (hot spots) inside the target was very minimal in tomotherapy arm compared to IMRT arm. Conformity index, homogeneity index between two arms were comparable.


Bucci MK, Bevan A, Roach M. Advances in radiation therapy: conventional to 3D, to IMRT, to 4D, and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):117-34.

Feuvret L, Noël G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):333-42.

Eisbruch A, Ship JA, Martel MK, Ten Haken RK, Marsh LH, Wolf GT, et al. Parotid gland sparing in patients undergoing bilateral head and neck irradiation: techniques and early results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36(2):469-80.

Smet S, Lambrecht M, Vanstraelen B, Nuyts S. Clinical and dosimetric evaluation of RapidArc versus standard sliding window IMRT in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2015;191(1):43-50.

Gregoire V, De Neve W, Eisbruch A, Lee N, Van den Weyngaert D, Van Gestel D. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck carcinoma. Oncologist. 2007;12(5):555-64.

Chatterjee S, Willis N, Locks SM, Mott JH, Kelly CG. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of helical tomotherapy, forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-phase conformal plans for radical radiotherapy treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1008):1083-90.

Vergeer MR, Doornaert PAH, Rietveld DHF, Leemans CR, Slotman BJ, Langendijk JA. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces radiation-induced morbidity and improves health-related quality of life: results of a nonrandomized prospective study using a standardized follow-up program. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2009;74(1):1-8.

Lambrecht M, Nevens D, Nuyts S. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. parotid-sparing 3D conformal radiotherapy. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2013;189(3):223-9.

Verellen D, Ridder M De, Linthout N, Tournel K, Soete G, Storme G. Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(12):949-60.

Xing L, Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, Li TF, Kim GY, et al. Overview of image-guided radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2006;31(2):91-112.

Burnet NG, Adams EJ, Fairfoul J, Tudor GSJ, Hoole ACF, Routsis DS, et al. Practical aspects of implementation of helical tomotherapy for intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2010;22(4):294-312.

Welsh JS, Patel RR, Ritter MA, Harari PM, Mackie TR, Mehta MP. Helical tomotherapy: an innovative technology and approach to radiation therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2002;1(4):311-6.

Sterzing F, Schubert K, Sroka-Perez G, Kalz J, Debus J, Herfarth K. Helical tomotherapy. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2008;184(1):8-14.

Murthy V, Master Z, Gupta T, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, Phurailatpam R, et al. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010;6(2):194.

Chavaudra J, Bridier A. Definition of volumes in external radiotherapy: ICRU reports 50 and 62. Cancer Radiother. 2001;5(5):472-8.

Nazmy M, Mousa A, Nazer G, Moftah B, Khafaga Y. Comparison of TomoTherapy and RapidArc in Hippocampus Sparing Brain Radiotherapy in Pediatrics. J Nucl Med Radiat Ther. 2017;8(2):326.

Fiorino C, Dell’Oca I, Pierelli A, Broggi S, De Martin E, Di Muzio N, et al. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78(3):276-82.

Blanco AI, Chao KSC, El Naqa I, Franklin GE, Zakarian K, Vicic M, et al. Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(4):1055-69.

Papiu M, Antonescu E, Radu M, Marita AJ, Moga AŞ. The efficiency of tomotherapy HD system on the treatment of different cancer localizations. Spinal Cord. 2019;5(1.02):0-31.

Yu D, Lu S, Wang L, Hu X, Li X, Bai Y, et al. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, volume-modulated arc therapy, and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal and cervical cancers. Research Square. 2020.

Liu Z, Xu C, Jiang R, Liu G, Liu Q, Zhou J, et al. Treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma by helical tomotherapy: an observational, prospective analysis. Translat Oncol. 2019;12(5):757-63.




How to Cite

B. R., Y., & Swamy, K. (2021). Comparison of dosimetry in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 9(11), 3374–3382.



Original Research Articles