Clinico-radiological and functional outcome of surgical management of displaced two part, three part and four part proximal humeral fractures in adults treated by PHILOS plate in a tertiary care hospital in North India: a prospective study of 30 patients

Authors

  • Pankaj Spolia Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College, Jammu. Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Abdul Ghani Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College, Jammu. Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Sakib Arfee Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College, Jammu. Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20213923

Keywords:

Proximal humeral fracture, Proximal humerus interlocking system, Visual analogue scale, Constant score

Abstract

Background: Treatment of proximal humeral fractures is challenging. In the past, the fractures were treated conservatively which compromised the functional results. PHILOS plate provides a good functional outcome with context to the early joint mobilization and rigid fixation of the fracture.

Methods: This was the prospective study of 30 patients aged 20 to 60 years (mean age 48.4 years) with proximal humeral fractures including two part, three part and four part fractures based on Neer’s classification, treated by open reduction internal fixation with PHILOS plating. Functional outcome was assessed using Constant-Murley Score.

Results: The final outcome was observed at 6 months follow up. The results were comparable with the existing literature. The Mean Constant Score at 6 month follow up was 79.4, range (38 to 92). Out of 30, (n = 12, 40%) had excellent outcome, (n = 9, 30%) had good functional outcome, 6 (20%) had moderate outcome, 3 (10 %) had poor outcome. Out of 30 patients, one patient with four part fracture had a lowest CS of 38. Complications were observed in 5, (16.7%) patients. Varus malunion in one patient, avascular necrosis in one patient, stiffness in one patient.

Conclusions: PHILOS plate gives stable fixation, enables early range of motion and minimizes complications with good functional outcome if done with expert hands.

References

Court, Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-7.

Baron JA, Barret JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone. 1996;18(3):209S-13S.

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365-71.

Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM. Proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93B(1):111.

Aaron D, Shatsky J, Paredes JC. Proximal humeral fractures: internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(24):2280-8.

Flores S, Merk BR. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus: A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2258- 64.

Robinson CM, Page RS. Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(9):1647-55.

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(6):799-804.

Court-Brown CM, Cattermole H, McQueen MM. Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):504-8.

Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. Part I: classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077e89.

Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fracture. Part II. Treatment of 3 part and 4 part fracture displacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1970;52-A:1090e103.

Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987;214:160e4.

Jensen MP. Interpretation of visual analogue scale ratings and change scores. J Pain. 2003;407-14.

Kristiansen B, Christensen SW. Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57:320-3.

Lever JP, Aksenov SA, Zdero R, Ahn H, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:23-9.

Seide K. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus A biomechanical study. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:176-82.

Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF. Biomechanical Analysis of Blade Plate Versus Locking Plate Fixation for a Proximal Humerus Fracture: Comparison Using Cadaveric and Synthetic Humeri. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(8):547-54.

Gerber C, Worner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2004;86(60):848-55.

Jagiasi JD, Patel MR, Daliya SG, Bochre A, Vora M. Assessment of functional outcome of surgical management of proximal humerus fracture treated with PHILOS plate. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(5):736-40.

Bansal V, Sohal HS, Bhoparai RS. Philos Plate in Proximal Humerus Fracture–Its Functional Outcome and Complications. Int J Orthop. 2015;2(2):317-22.

Patel V, Dwivedi M. Open reduction and internal fixation in proximal humerus fractures by proximal humerus locking plate. A study of 60 cases. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(4):78-83.

Iglesias-Rodríguez. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2021;16:402.

Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:741e5.

Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC, et al. Surgical versus non surgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(10):1037-47.

Nabil AE, Vishwas P, Adeel H. Mini-external fixation of two- and three- part proximal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:437e42.

Vijay S. Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Proximal Humerus Locking Plated-A Prospective Study. J Orthop Trauma Rehab. 2014;18:89-93.

Zeigler P, Kühle L, Stöckle U, Wintermeyer E, Stollhof LE, Ihle C, et al. Evaluation of the Constant Score: which is the method to assess the objective strength? BMC Musculoskeletal Dis. 2019;20:403.

Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicentre , observational study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2009;91:1320e8.

Kilic B, Uysal M, Cinar BM. Early results of treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the PHILOS locking plate. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42:149e53.

Monga P, Verma R, Sharma VK. Closed reduction and external fixation for displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2009;17:142e5.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-28

How to Cite

Spolia, P., Ghani, A., & Arfee, S. (2021). Clinico-radiological and functional outcome of surgical management of displaced two part, three part and four part proximal humeral fractures in adults treated by PHILOS plate in a tertiary care hospital in North India: a prospective study of 30 patients. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 9(10), 3006–3011. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20213923

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles