DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220987

Role of autofluorescence technique in detection of mycobacterial bacilli on fine needle aspiration cytology in tubercular lymphadenitis in comparison to conventional methods

Sanjay Kumar, Ritika Gupta, Nidhi Kaushik, Sant Prakash Kataria, Sunita Singh

Abstract


Background: Lymphadenopathy is the most common presentation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has emerged an important role in the evaluation of peripheral adenopathy as a possible non-invasive procedure. Conventional Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method for acid fast bacilli (AFB) plays an important role in the diagnosis and the monitoring of treatment in tuberculosis. Fluorescence microscopy using auramine-rhodamine (AR) or Papanicolaou (PAP) staining has been considered superior to ZN staining.

Methods: The study was conducted in tertiary care centre for a period of 2 years. A total number of 75 patients were included in the study. Four smears made from each aspirate: three air dried smears were stained with Giemsa, ZN, and AR stains and one was wet fixed for PAP stain for autofluorescence. Aspirate sent for culture over Lowenstein-Jensen medium was taken as a reference method.

Results: Seventy five aspirates reported as tuberculous lymphadenitis on cytomorphology were stained with various methods. Autofluorescence was of more diagnostic utility for detection of AFB when cytologically only necrosis (64.71%) or granulomatous lymphadenitis (42.11%) was seen. With necrotising granulomatous lymphadenitis reported cases, Auramine Rhodamine was positive in maximum cases (66.7%) and was significant statistically. Overall taking culture as gold standard ZN stain was most specific (100%) and Auramine Rhodamine was most sensitive (82%).

Conclusions: There is a definite advantage of autofluorescence in detecting mycobacteria over Ziehl-Neelsen and auramine rhodamine stain as it is more sensitive as well as an inexpensive technique. Autofluorescence can be a useful addition to routine cytology for early diagnosis and effective treatment.


Keywords


Tuberculosis, Autofluorescence, FNAC, Lymph node

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dandapat MC, Mishra BM, Dash SP, Kar PK. Peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a review of 80 cases. Br J Surg. 1990;77:911-2.

Lau SK, Kwan S, Lee J, Wei WI. Source of tubercle bacilli in cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:558-61.

Pahwa R, Hedau S, Jain S, Jain N, Arora VM, Kumar N et al. Assessment of possible tuberculous lymphadenopathy by PCR compared to non-molecular methods. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:873-8.

Singh KK, Muralidhar M, Kumar A. Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:355-61.

Rajan VS, Goh YS. Intermittent chemotherapy in the treatment of tuberculosis cutis. A preliminary report. Brit J of Dermatol. 1972;87:270-3.

Daniel TM. The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: a selective review. J Lab Clin Med. 1990;116:277-82.

Annam V, Kulkarni MH, Puranik RB. Comparison of the modified fluorescent method and conventional Ziehl Neelsen method in the detection of acid fast bacilli in lymph node aspirates. Cyto J. 2009;6:13-20.

Jain A, Bhargava A, Agarwal SK. A comparative study of two commonly used staining techniques for acid fast bacilli in clinical specimens. Indian J Tuberc. 2002;49:161-2.

Wright CA, Zyl VY, Burgess SM, Blumberg L, Leiman G. Mycobacterial autofluorescence in papanicolaou stained lymph node aspirates: a glimmer in the dark?. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:257-60.

Negi SS, Khan SFB, Gupta S, Pasha ST, Khare S, Lal S. Comparision of the conventional diagnostic modalities, bactec culture and polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;23:29-33.

Iseman MD. Tuberculosis. In: Bennet JC, Plum F, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 20th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders. 1996;1683-9.

Wolinsky E. Tuberculosis. In: Wyngaarden JB, Smith LH Jr, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 18th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders–Harcourt Brace Javonovich. 1988;1682-93.

Fontanilla JM, Barnes A, von Reyn CF. Current diagnosis and management of peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:555-62.

Lau SK, Wei WI, Hsu C, Engzell UC. Efficacy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of tuberculous cervical lymphadenopathy. J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104:24-7.

Handa U, Mundi I, Mohan S. Nodal tuberculosis revisited: A review. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6:6-12.

Deveci HS, Kule M, Kule ZA, Habesoglu TE. Diagnostic Challenges in Cervical Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: A review. North Clin Istanbul. 2016;3:150-5.

Gupta PR. Difficulties in managing lymph node tuberculosis. Lung India. 2004;21:50-3.

Liu Q, Li W, Chen Y, Du X, Wang C, Liang B et al. Performance of interferon-γ release assay in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: a meta-analysis. Peer J. 2017;12:5.

Narain R, Rao MS. Chandrashekhar P. Microscopy positive and microscopy negative cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respire Dis. 1971;103:761-3.

Polesky A, Grove W, Bhatia G. Peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis: Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Med. 2005;84:350-62.

Hopewell PC, Small PM. Tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. In: Stein JH, ed. Internal Medicine. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby. 1994;2193-212.

Gupta AK, Nayar M, Chandra M. Critical appraisal of fine needle aspiration cytology in tuberculous lymphadenitis. Acta Cytol. 1992;36:391-4.

Thakur B, Mehrotra R, Nigam JS. Correlation of various techniquesin diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. Pathol Res Int. 2013;824620:1-4.

Wright CA, Van der Burg M, Geiger D, Noordzij JG, Burgess SM, Marais BJ. Diagnosing mycobacterial lymphadenitis in children using fine needle aspiration biopsy: cytomorphology, ZN staining and autofluorescence-making more of less. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:245-51.

Joshi P, Singh M, Bhargava A, Singh M, Mehrotra R. Autofluorescence- An important Ancillary technique for detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Revisited. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;41:330-4.

Patino S, Alamo L, Cimino M, Casart Y, Bartoli F, Garcia JM, et al. Autofluorescence of mycobacteria as a tool for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3296-302.

Metre S, Jayaram G. Acid-fast bacilli in aspiration smears from tuberculous lymph nodes: an analysis of 255 cases. Acta Cytol. 1987;31;17-9.

Bailey TM, Akhtar M, Ali AM. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:732-6.

Mittal P, Handa U, Mohan H, Gupta V. Comparative evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, Culture, and PCR in diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;39:822-6.

Sreenidhi GM, Nandeeshkumar GN. Clinicopathological study of cervical tubercular lymphadenopathy at KIMS Banglore. J evolution Med Dental Sci. 2013;60:124-7.

Natraj G, Kurup S, Padit A, Mehta P. Correlation of Fine Needle Aspiration cytology, smear and culture in Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: A Prospective study. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48:113-6.

Ersoz C, Polat A, Serin MS. Fine Needle Aspiration cytology in tuberculous lymphadenitis. Cytopathol. 1998;9:201-7.

Goel MM, Ranjan V, Dhole TN. Polymerase chain reaction vs. conventional diagnosis in the fine needle aspirates of tuberculous lymph nodes. Acta cytol. 2001;45:333-40.

Alijafari AS, Khalil EAG, Hag EI, Ibrahim ME, Elsafi MEO, Hussein AM et al. Diagnosis of Tuberculous lymphadenitis by FNAC, microbiological methods and PCR: a comparative study. Cytopathol. 2004;15:44-8.

Gehnaat J, Omidi A, Ghazvini K, Ayatollahi H, Hossein A, Erfanian M et al. Comparison of Multiplex PCR and Acid fast and Auramine Rhodamine staining for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non Tuberculosis Mycobacteria in Paraffin embedded pleural and bronchial tissues for granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis. Internet J Microbiol. 2006;4:1-5.