Evaluation of the short-term outcome of unilateral urethral mobilization for the management of bulbar urethral stricture


  • Kartik Chandra Ghosh Department of Urology Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Prodyut Kumar Saha Department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Masud Ahmed Department of Urology, Mugda Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Farhad Mahmud Department of Pathology, Colonel Malek Medical College, Manikganj, Bangladesh
  • Uttam Karmaker Department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh




Outcome, Buccal mucosal graft, Unilateral, Urethral mobilization


Background: In modern urology, successful male urethral reconstruction poses a continuing challenge.

Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study conducted in the department of urology, Dhaka medical college hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh between January 2010 to December 2011. 35 patients having bulbar urethral strictures admitted in the department were study participants. All the participants underwent unilateral urethral mobilization, for buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty and followed up at least six months. RGU and MCU was done when peak flow was <15 ml /sec in uroflowmetry. Urethroscopy was done at 3rd and 6th month. The statistics used to analyze the data were descriptive statistics, and the tests done were student’s t-test, chi-square test, ANOVA, and Fisher exact test.

Results: The length of strictures was observed ≤3 cm among 31% (n=11) and >3 cm among 69% (n=24) patients. As the immediate postoperative outcome among the participants, we found the mean peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), 15.3±1.2 and voided urine volume (ml), 328.8±50. Finally, as the postoperative outcome after 6 months among the participants, we found the mean peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), 24.2±2.9; voided urine volume (ml), 330.8±50.1 and PVR (ml), 11.6±3.3. In this study, some potential complications were bleeding and wound infection which were found among 11.43% and 17.14% patients respectively.

Conclusions: Considering the satisfactory outcomes and lower complications unilateral urethral mobilization procedure can be considered as an effective treatment method for the management of bulbar urethral stricture. 



Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM. Surgery of the penis and urethra. Campbell's-Walash Urology, 9th eds, Saunders, Philadelphia. 2007.

McAninch, JW. Disorders of the penis and male urethra. Smith's general urology. 17th eds, McGraw-Hill Co, Philadelphia, New York. 2008.

Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Dogra PN, Tandon S. Dorsal buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty by a ventral sagittal urethrotomy and minimal access perineal approach for anterior urethral stricture. BJU Int. 2004;93:1287-90.

Mangera A, Patterson JM, Chapple CR. A Systematic Review of Graft Augmentation Urethroplasty Techniques for the Treatment of Anterior Urethral Strictures. Euro Asso Urol. 2011;59:797-814.

Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Guazzoi G, Canti CA. Bulbar urethroplasty using the dorsal approach: Current techniques. Int Braz J Urol. 2003;29:155-61.

Barbagli G, Stefani SD, Sighinolfi MC, Annino F, Micali S, Bianchi G. Bulbar urethroplasty with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft and fibrin glue. Eur Urol. 2006;50:467-74.

Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard. BJU Int. 2004;93:1191-3.

Barbagli G, Stefani SD, Annino F, Carne CD, Bianchi G. Muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty: a new technique. Eur Urol. 2008;54:335-43.

Bhargava S, Chapple CR, Bullock AJ, Layton C, Macneil S. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2004;93:807-11.

Chaudhary R, Jain N, Singh K, Singh HB, Chaudhary R, Biswas R. Dorsolateral onlay urethroplasty for pan anterior urethral stricture by a unilateral urethral mobilisation approach. BMJ case rep. 2011;10:1-7.

Kulkarni SB, Kulkarni JS, Kirpekar DV. A new technique of urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliteran. J Urol. 2003;163(1):352-57.

Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol. 2008;53:828-33.

Peterson CA, Webster GD. Management 'of urethral stricture disease: developing options for surgical intervention. BJU Int. 2004;94:971-76.

Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhanim A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. ‘Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int. 2005;95:625-9.

Palminteri E, Manzoni G, Berdondini E. Combined dorsal plus ventral double buccal mucosa graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol. 2008;53:81-90.

Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G. One-stage circumferential buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for bulbous stricture repair. Urology. 2003;61:452-5.

Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts. J Urol. 2001;165:1131-4.




How to Cite

Ghosh, K. C., Saha, P. K., Ahmed, M., Mahmud, F., & Karmaker, U. (2021). Evaluation of the short-term outcome of unilateral urethral mobilization for the management of bulbar urethral stricture. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 9(12), 3506–3509. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20214700



Original Research Articles