DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220308

Moral dilemma: is there a moral difference between killing and letting die in healthcare?

Mansour M. Alanazi, Mohammed R. Alanazi

Abstract


The purpose of this paper was to prove that there was no moral difference between killing and letting one die in healthcare. It was important to be aware of the moral equivalence of killing and letting die. The Abrahamic religions; Islam, Christianity and Judaism, all argue for the sanctity of life. The world’s major religions Islam, Christianity and Judaism all have doctrines concerning the sanctity of life and they support the main arguments of this paper that there is no moral difference between killing and letting die. In relation to patient autonomy and the patient's right to die, it is very important to highlight that doctors have a moral and legal responsibility to save lives. In addition, we discussed the distinction centres on the true definition of patient autonomy and who was responsible for defining the quality of life. The intention and foresight were critical points that supported the thesis statement that killing and letting one die were one in the same. The acts and omissions doctrine as described in this paper showed that there were no moral difference to kill a person or to let him die. Finally, we extensively discussed the various viewpoints regarding whether or not there was a moral difference between killing and letting die. There is no doubt that the debate over killing and letting die will continue for years to come. It is critical that the issue be addressed at this particular time in history with the advent of modern medical technology.


Keywords


Euthanasia, Patient autonomy, Intention, Foresight, Acts and omissions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen J, Chavez S, DeSimone S, Howard D, Johnson K, LaPierr L, et al. Americans' attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. J Sociol Soc Welfare. 2006;33(2):5-19.

BBC. Fact sheet: Judaism and Abortion, 2009. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/jewishethics/abortion_1.shtml. Accessed on 15 November 2021.

The Centre of Bioethics and Human Dignity. Fact sheet: The Groningen protocol: making infanticide legal does not make it moral, 2005. Available at: http://cbhd.org/content/groningen-protocol-making-infanticide-legal-does-not-make-it-moral. Accessed on 15 November 2021.

Begley AM. Acts, omissions, intentions and motives: a philosophical examination of the moral distinction between killing and letting die. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(4):865-73.

Brock DW. Voluntary active euthanasia. Hastings Center Rep. 1992;22(2):10-22.

Callahan D. When self-determination runs amok. Hastings Center Rep. 1992;22(2):52-5.

Chochinov H, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S, Harlos M. Understanding the will to live in patients nearing death. Psychosomatics. 2005;46(1):7-10.

Dickey N. Euthanasia: a concept whose time has come? Issue Law Med. 1993;8(4):521-32.

Dines A. Does the distinction between killing and letting die justify some forms of euthanasia? J Advanced Nurs. 1995;21:911-6.

Fenigsen R. Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Issue Law Med. 1990;308(6940):1346-9.

Fenigsen R. Dutch euthanasia: the new government ordered study. Issue Law Med. 2004;20(1):73-9.

Gesang B. Passive and active euthanasia: what is the difference? Med Health Care Philos. 2008;11(2):175-80.

Henk AMJ, Jos VMW. Euthanasia: normal medical practice? Hastings Center Rep. 1992;22(2):34-8.

Acts and omissions: killing and letting die. J Med Ethics. 1984;10(2):59-72.

Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child. Fact sheet: The sanctity of human life is a basic concept in Islam. Available at: http://www.spuc.org.uk/about/muslim-division/euthanasia. Accessed on 15 November 2021.

Levesque WR. (08 November 2003). Schiavo's wishes recalled in records. Available at: http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/08/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_wishes_reca.shtml. Accessed on 16 November 2021.

Cision. Fact sheet: Rick Santorum endorses wisconsin personhood amendment, 2012. Available at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb9366947.htm. Accessed on 16 November 2021.

Malm HM. Killing, letting die, and simple conflicts. Philosophy Public Affair. 1989;18(3):238-58.

McLachlan H. Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die. J Med Ethic. 2011;37:766-7.

McLachlan HV. The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia. J Med Ethic. 2008;34(8):636-8.

Quinn WS. (1989). "Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of doing and allowing. Philosoph Rev. 1989;98(3):287-312.

Rachels J. The end of life: euthanasia and morality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.

Catholic New Agency. Fact sheet: The Catholic church and abortion. Church Has Always Condemned Abortion. Available at: http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/abortion/catholic-teaching/the-catholic-church-and-abortion/. Accessed on 16 November 2021.

Steinbock B. Killing and letting die. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1980.

Summy R. Euthanasia-choice and death. Soc Alternativ. 2008;27(3):71.

Verhagen E, Sauer PJJ. The Groningen protocol-euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N E J Med. 2005;352(10):959-62.