DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220975
Published: 2022-03-28

Comparison of clinical outcomes among thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed STEMI patients: a single-centre observational study

Parvaiz Kadloor, G. Abhishek, G. Rajashekhar Reddy

Abstract


Background: There is a paucity of data that compare clinical outcomes, especially morbidity and mortality among thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in Indian population.

Methods: An observational, single-centre study involving 70 patients who were diagnosed with STEMI from February 2014 to June 2015. Patients were thrombolysed after meticulous evaluation of indications for thrombolytic therapy, and later whenever needed they were subjected to revascularization therapy of either percutenous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Then, STEMI patients were categorized into thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed groups. Mortality and morbidity parameters such as effort tolerance expressed in terms of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and typical anginal chest pain at 1, 6, and 12-month were primary outcomes.

Results: Mean age of the cohort was 53.2 years: 48 men and 22 women. Of the total, 58 (82.9%) patients underwent thrombolysis. Mean window period of thrombolysis therapy was 8.1±2.0 hours. Revascularization was required in 80% of cases. At 12-month, STEMI patients who were thrombolyzed had significantly better effort tolerance in terms of NYHA class than those who were non-thrombolyzed (25% versus 13.8%; p<0.005). At 1 and 6-month, STEMI patients who were thrombolyzed had significantly better effort tolerance in terms of typical anginal pain than those who were non-thrombolyzed (1-month, 82.8% versus 58.3%; p<0.005; 6-month, 4.3% versus 0.0%; p<0.005).

Conclusions: This study enlightened the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy together with revascularization (CABG or PCI) in reducing the morbidity rate than revascularization alone.


Keywords


Anginal chest pain, NYHA class, Revascularization, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Thrombolytic therapy

Full Text:

PDF

References


STEMI Programme (Tamil Nadu). National Health Mission. Available at: https://wwwgooglecom/ search?q=3%2C50000+to+400%2C000+STEMI%2FNSTEMI+deaths+every+year+in+India+(10%25+mortality)+ie+around+1100+MI+deaths+per+day&rlz=1C1GCEA_enIN928IN928&oq=3%2C50000+to+400%2C000+STEMI%2FNSTEMI+deaths+every+year+in+India+(10%25+mortality)+ie+around+1100+MI+deaths+per+day&aqs=chrome69i57877j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. Accessed on 25 December 2021.

Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, King SB, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2205-41.

Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(1):28-66.

Dalal J, Alexander T, Banerjee P, Dayasagar V, Iyengar S, Kerkar P, et al. 2013 consensus statement for early reperfusion and pharmaco-invasive approach in patients presenting with chest pain diagnosed as STEMI (ST elevation myocardial infarction) in an Indian setting. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62:13.

Chopra A, Patted SV, Parikh M, Agarwal R, Jaishankar K, Modi N. Use of thrombolytic agents for ST-elevation myocardial infarction care in India: An expert consensus. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2021;7(3):182.

Choi JC, Kang S-Y, Kang J-H, Ko Y-J, Bae J-M. Are in-Hospital delays important obstacles in thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke? J Clin Neurol. 2007;3(2):71-8.

Kalish SC, Gurwitz JH, Krumholz HM, Avorn J. A cost-effectiveness model of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(6):321-30.

Marder VJ, Sherry S. Thrombolytic therapy: current status. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(23):1512-20.

Raman J. Management of Heart Failure. Volume 2. 1st Edition. Springer. 2008.

Newberry L, Barnett GK, Ballard N. A new mnemonic for chest pain assessment. J Emerg Nurs. 2005;31(1):84-5.

Members WC, Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(3):671-719.

Woo KS, White HD. Pharmacoeconomic aspects of treatment of acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic agents. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;3(3):192-204.

White HD, Van de Werf FJ. Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97(16):1632-46.

Kim D-Y, Wala Z, Islam S, Islam R, Ahn M. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in a low income setting in rural Bangladesh. IJC Heart Vasc. 2019;23:100376.

Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, Knatterud GL, Terrin ML, Williams DO, et al. Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287(15):1943-51.

Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, Knatterud GL, Terrin ML, Williams DO, et al. Thrombolytic therapy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2002;287(15):1943-51.

Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):13-20.