Appositeness of artificial intelligence in modern medicine

Haris P.; Sreedhar S.; Kunhikoyamu .; Namboothiri M.; Devi S.; Vinayachandran S.; Prejisha B.; Kusumam V. N.; Lekshminath G.; Binub K.

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220037

Authors

Haris P. Department of General Surgery, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Sreedhar S. Department of ENT, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Kunhikoyamu . Department of Psychiatry, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Namboothiri M. Department of ENT, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Devi S. Department of OBG, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Vinayachandran S. Department of OBG, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Prejisha B. Department of OBG, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Kusumam V. N. Department of OBG, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Lekshminath G. Department of OBG, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India
Binub K. Department of Community Medicine, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220037

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Application, Data, Healthcare

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can be demonstrated as intelligence demonstrated by machines.AI research has gone through different phases like simulating the brain, modeling human problem solving, formal logic, large databases of knowledge and imitating animal behavior. In the beginning of 21st century, highly mathematical statistical machine learning has dominated the field, was found useful and considered in helping to solve many challenging problems throughout industry and academia. The domain was discovered and work was done on the assumption that human intelligence can be simulated by machines. These initiate some discussions in raising queries about the mind and the ethics of creating artificial beings with human-like intelligence. Myth, fiction, and philosophy are involved in the creation of this field. The debates and discussion also point to concerns of misuse regarding this technology.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amisha, Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2328-31.

Hamlet P, Trembeley J. Artificial Intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 2017;69:36-40.

Appari A, Eric JM, Anthony DL. Meaningful use of electronic health record systems and process quality of care: evidence from a panel data analysis of U.S. acute-care hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(2):354-75.

Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501-4.

Roumia M, Steinhubl S. Improving cardiovascular outcomes using electronic health records. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(2):451.

Panesar S, Cagle Y, Chander D, Morey J, Fernandez-Miranda J, Kliot M. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Surgical Robotics. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):223-6.

Pichai S. Artificial intelligence, 2021. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coz4AuBMTA. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, Gompels L, Edwards T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):231-7.

Hoden I. Advantages and disadvantages of EHRs, 2020. Available at: https://www.wheel.com/ companiesblog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-ehrs. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Schein H. Advantages of Health Records, 2021. Available at: https://www.micromd.com/emr/ advanta. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Hoover R. MSN-HCI, RN Benefits of using an electronic health record. Nurs Critic Care. 2017;12(1):9-10.

USF Health. Benefits of Electronic Health records, 2021. Available at: https://health.usf.edu/ care/patientresources/electronic-health-records. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;17(1):115-31.

Lane T. A short history of robotic surgery. Robotics: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018. Available at: rcsann.supp1.5.pdf. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Kim VB, Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, Bailey BM, Young JA, Nifong LW, et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(1):33-40.

Fuchs KH. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy. 2002;34(2):154-9.

Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Whelan RL, Trokel M, Laird DA, Terry MB, et al. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(5):427-30.

Satava RM, Bowersox JC, Mack M. Robotic surgery: state of the art and future trends. Contemp Surg. 2001;57:489-99.

Prasad SM, Ducko CT, Stephenson ER, Chambers CE, Damiano RJ. Prospective clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary grafting with 1-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2001;233(6):725-32.

Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153-60.

Garis HD. A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part I: Large-scale brain simulations. Netherland: Elsevier; 2010: 3-29.

Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55.