Prevalence of dry eye among paramedical students of Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220979Keywords:
Dry eye, Prevalence, Gland, Team film abnormalityAbstract
Background: The prevalence of dry eye is 32% in India which is higher than global prevalence. Dry eye is not a disease but a symptom complex occurring as a deficiency and abnormalities of the tear film. Dry eye infection (DED) is perhaps the most pervasive visual sickness on the planet. The point of our investigation was to acquire the pooled pervasiveness of DED in students and investigate its expected relates.
Methods: It was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based qualitative and observational study was conducted among the students of the paramedical college of Teerthankar Mahaveer university. The pre-validated questionnaire was divided into three main sections involving the demographic data including the information about gender, age, students studying stream in the second section the questions about general health and question related to dryness in the eye.
Results: Out of a total of 40 participants, 65% (26) were male and 35% (35) were female with the average age of the participants was 21.40 with the average age 21.40. During day how often feeling dryness for this we got the responses of 15% (06) for never, 82.50% (33) for some time and 2.50% (01). Further we have assessed the about dryness in their eyes by presenting the question During day how often feeling dryness for this we got the responses of 15% (06) for never, 82.50% (33) for some time and 2.50% (01).
Concussions: The finding that dry eye symptoms are particularly common in young adults is concerning, and warrants further study.
Metrics
References
Smith JA, Albenz J, Begley C, Caffery B, Nichols K, Schaumberg DA et al. The study of disease transmission of dry eye sickness: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of Global Dry Eye Workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):93-107.
Lemp MA. Epidemiology and classification of dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:791-803.
Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE, Sullivan DA. Prevalence of dry eye sickness among US men: gauges from the Doctors' Wellbeing Studies. Curve Ophthalmol. 2009;127(6):763-8.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BEK. Long-term incidence of dry eye in an older population. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(8):668-74.
The study of disease transmission of dry eye illness: report of the study of disease transmission Subcommittee of the Global Dry Eye Work-Shop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):93-107.
The definition and grouping of dry eye illness: report of the Definition and Arrangement Subcommittee of the Global Dry Eye WorkShop, Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75-92.
Viso E, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Gude F. Prevalence of and associated factors for dry eye in a Spanish adult population (the Salnes Eye Study) Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(1):15-21.
NA. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: Report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75-92.
Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, Beuerman RW, Pflugfelder SC et al. The role of the lachrymal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:409-16.
Bron JA, Abelson MB, Ousler G, Pearce E, Tomlinson A, Yokoi N et al. Diagnostic methodology of dry eye disease: Report of the diagnostic methodology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:108-52.
NA. Management and therapy of dry eye disease: Report of the manage and therapy subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:163-78.
Dubey G, Prabhu AV, Khan T, Pant K. Role of polyunsaturated fatty acid derivative flaxseeds in the treatment of dry eyes- an overview, Int J Current Res Review. 2020;12(23):35-40.