Atypical presentation and complications of term pregnancy with Mullerian duct anomaly: two case reports

Authors

  • Tanvi Katoch Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PGI Chandigarh, Punjab, India
  • Manvi Katoch Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. RPGMC Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20221496

Keywords:

Mullerian duct anomalies, Pregnancy, Bicornuate uterus

Abstract

Mullerian duct anomalies present as vague and overlapping features with other gynaecological conditions or may remain asymptomatic. These can lead to various obstetrical complications such as miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, abnormal placental implantation, malpresentation, increased risk of cesarean section, retained placenta and others. We hereby presented two cases with term pregnancy in women with Mullerian duct anomaly and the obstetrical complications they had. The first case landed up in a cesarean section at term due to breech presentation as a result of MDA. The second case had a vaginal delivery followed by entrapped retained placenta due to MDA, which had to be removed in piece meal. We hereby discussed the possible pathophysiology leading to these obstetrical complications in MDA pregnancies. MDA can lead to complications in pregnancy and previously undiagnosed women when detected with MDAs should be informed about complications and treatment options before and during pregnancy, for better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Author Biographies

Tanvi Katoch, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PGI Chandigarh, Punjab, India

senior resident, dept of obstetrics and gynecology

Manvi Katoch, Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. RPGMC Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India

Senior resident, dept of anesthesiology

References

Kim MA, Kim HS, Kim YH. Reproductive, obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(21):4797.

Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: A systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;38(4):371-82.

Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(984):1034-42.

Lin PC, Bhatnagar KP, Nettleton GS, Nakajima ST. Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction. Fertil. Steril. 2002;78(5):899-915.

Favilli A, Tosto V, Ceccobelli M, Parazzini F, Franchi M, Bini V, et al. Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2021;21(1):268.

Grimbizis GF, Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Schoubroeck D, et al. The thessaloniki eshre/esge consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2-7.

Simón C, Moreno C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Cytokines and embryo implantation. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1998;39(1-2):117-31.

Greenbaum S, Wainstock T, Dukler D, Leron E, Erez O. Underlying mechanisms of retained placenta: evidence from a population based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:12-7.

Perlman, Nicola C, Carusi DA. Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:527-34.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-27

How to Cite

Katoch, T., & Katoch, M. (2022). Atypical presentation and complications of term pregnancy with Mullerian duct anomaly: two case reports. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 10(6), 1368–1370. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20221496

Issue

Section

Case Reports