Cost analysis of reprocessing of gloves

Ravi Gupta; Aditi Mehra

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20221792

Authors

Ravi Gupta Department of Orthopedics, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India
Aditi Mehra Department of Hospital Administration, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20221792

Keywords:

Reprocessing, Resource limited setting, Cost analysis, Reuse

Abstract

Background: Gloves are an integral component of standard precautions. Reprocessing and reuse of gloves are undertaken in hospitals in resource- limited settings to reduce the cost incurred in the procurement of single use disposable gloves. There is no standardized procedure to ascertain the integrity of gloves after reprocessing. The aim of the study was to calculate the cost of reprocessing gloves vis a vis use of disposable gloves.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the CSSD. The cost incurred in all the steps of reprocessing of gloves in terms of manpower involved, consumables used and the cost of operating the equipment was determined. The overall cost was then divided by the number of total pairs of gloves reprocessed during the study period to arrive at the cost of reprocessing per pair of gloves.

Results: Total cost incurred for running the machinery, manpower involved and consumables used was calculated to be Rs. 716,649. Number of pairs of gloves reprocessed was 42900. The total cost incurred in reprocessing one pair of glove in this setting was calculated to be Rs. 16.7 per glove, whereas the cost of sterile disposable surgical gloves was Rs. 11.50 during the study period.

Conclusions: The results of the present study show that the reprocessing of gloves is not cheaper than using disposable gloves. The healthcare institutions should carefully look into the sterilisation techniques vis a vis the cost of using the disposable gloves.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10):65-164.

Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, Rosenthal R, Zwahlen M, Fueglistaler P, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):553-8.

Goldmann DA. The role of barrier precautions in infection control. J Hosp Infect. 1991;18:515-23.

Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):898-900.

Soldá SC, Assef JC, Parreira JG, Perlingeiro JA, Candelária PA, Cury MP, et al. Undetected surgical glove perforation during emergency procedures. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009;55(5):597-600.

Kojima Y, Ohashi M. Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(3):1078-80.

Anand S, Pogorelić Z, Singh A, Llorente CM, Krishnan N, Dhua AK, et al. Comparison of Unnoticed Glove Perforations during Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children (Basel). 2022;9(2):179.

Arora P, Kumari S, Sodhi J, Talati S, Gupta AK. Gloves Reprocessing: Does It Really Save Money? Indian J Surg. 2015;77(3):1291-4.

Dondorp AM, Dünser MW, Schultz MJ. Sepsis Management in Resource-limited Settings. Cham, CH: Springer; 2019.

Gunasekera PC, Fernando RJ, Silva KK. Glove failure: an occupational hazard of surgeons in a developing country. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42(2):95-7.

Sohn RL, Murray MT, Franko A, Hwang PK, Dulchavsky SA, Grimm MJ. Detection of surgical glove integrity. Am Surg. 2000;66(3):302-6.

Makama JG, Okeme IM, Makama EJ, Ameh EA. Glove Perforation Rate in Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study To Evaluate the Efficacy of Double Gloving. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17(4):436-42.

WHO. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, 2009. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle. Accessed on 22 April 2022.

NSE. Standard Infection Control Precautions Literature Review: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Gloves, 2016. Available at: https://www.nipcm.hps.scot.nhs.uk/media/1668/2016-07-sicp-lr-gloves-v3. Accessed on 22 April 2022.

Bekele A, Makonnen N, Tesfaye L, Taye M. Incidence and patterns of surgical glove perforations: experience from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):26.

Hagos B, Kibwage IO, Mwongera M, Muthotho JN, Githiga IM, Mukindia GG. The microbial and physical quality of recycled gloves. East Afr Med J. 1997;74(4):224-6.

Baid R, Agarwal R. Powdered gloves: Time to bid adieu. J Postgrad Med. 2017;63(3):206.