Diagnostic performance of routine urinalysis parameters in urinary tract infection

Authors

  • Mary Netheya Department of Pathology, Yenepoya Medical College, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Hilda Fernandes Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260228

Keywords:

Urinalysis, Urine culture, Bacteriuria, Leukocyte esterase and nitrite

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common bacterial infection presenting from asymptomatic bacteriuria to severe disease. Early detection is essential, and urinalysis remains the most frequently used screening tool owing to its rapidity and low cost, although urine culture is the diagnostic gold standard. Dipstick tests such as leukocyte esterase (LE) and nitrite (NIT) are widely used, but their performance varies. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of LE, NIT, leukocyte count, and bacteriuria in predicting significant bacteriuria compared with urine culture.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult mid-stream urine samples processed in the Pathology and Microbiology Departments of FMMC Hospital, Mangalore (March, 2022). Of 3618 urinalysis samples, 306 had concurrent culture. Dipstick parameters (LE, NIT) and microscopic sediment findings (leukocyte count, bacteriuria) were recorded. Culture growth ≥10⁵ CFU/ml was taken as significant. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and kappa.

Results: Among 278 samples, females were slightly more represented. E. coli was the most common isolate (43.2%). Sixty-five percent showed >10⁵ CFU/ml growth. NIT was positive in 16%, while LE 3+ was the most frequent dipstick result. High leukocyte count (≥20 WBC/hpf) occurred in 37% and bacteriuria in 29%. High leukocyte count showed 43.4% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Combining ≥20 WBC/hpf with bacteriuria improved specificity (91.7%) and PPV (81.8%).

Conclusions: Routine urinalysis is useful as an initial screening tool, but microscopic sediment analysis is superior to dipstick testing. However, urine culture remains essential for definitive diagnosis.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

dos Santos JC, Weber LP, Perez LR. Evaluation of urinalysis parameters to predict urinary-tract infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2007;11(5):479-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-86702007000500008

Semeniuk H, Church D. Evaluation of the Leukocyte Esterase and Nitrite Urine Dipstick Screening Tests for Detection of Bacteriuria in Women with Suspected Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3051-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.9.3051-3052.1999

Pinto AC, Devaraju S, Basavaraju VK, Thomas BM. Routine urinalysis-predictor of urinary tract infection. Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;14(2):279-83.

Leman P. Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002;9(2):141-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200206000-00008

Oneson R, Gröschel DH. Leukocyte esterase activity and nitrite test as a rapid screen for significant bacteriuria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83(1):84-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/83.1.84

Lun A, Ziebig R, Priem F. Routine workflow for use of urine strips and urine flow cytometer UF-100 in the hospital laboratory. Clin Chem. 1999;45:1305-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/45.8.1305

Bellazreg F, Abid M, Lasfar NB, Hattab Z, Hachfi W, Letaief A. Diagnostic value of dipstick test in adult symptomatic urinary tract infections: results of a cross-sectional Tunisian study. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33:131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.33.131.17190

Demilie T, Beyene G, Melaku S, Tsegaye W. Diagnostic accuracy of rapid urine dipstick test to predict urinary tract infection among pregnant women in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-481

McLaughlin SP, Carson CC. Urinary Tract Infections in women. Med Clin N Am. 2004;88:417-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00148-2

Simerville JA, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ. Urinalysis: a comprehensive review. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(6):1153-62.

Nostrand JDV, Junkins AD, Bartholdi RK. Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:709-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1309/428N-60XK-UQ3Q-BXLC

Kim D, Oh SC, Liu C, Kim Y, Park Y, Jeong SH. Prediction of urine culture results by automated urinalysis with digital flow morphology analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85404-1

Devillé WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol. 2004;4:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-4-4

Pfaller MA, Koontz FP. Laboratory evaluation of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests for the detection of bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21(5):840-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.21.5.840-842.1985

Sawyer KP, Stone LL. Evaluation of a leukocyte dip-stick test used for screening urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;20(4):820-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.20.4.820-821.1984

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Netheya, M., & Fernandes, H. (2026). Diagnostic performance of routine urinalysis parameters in urinary tract infection. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(2), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260228

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles