Study of local manifestations of snake bite and its surgical implications, at a rural hospital in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20223092Keywords:
Surgical implications, Snakebite, Surgical interventionsAbstract
Background: Manifestations of snakebite have local and systemic implications. While systemic manifestations can be life-threatening, local complications like cellulitis, necrosis, and compartment syndrome secondary to snakebite can threaten limb survival. This study undertakes the recognition of local complications and its outcome.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at our tertiary center in India. 219 snake bitten patients presenting in between January 2013 to December 2020, were studied. Surgical interventions whenever required for managing local surgical complications were recorded and analyzed.
Results: Of the 219 patients, 118 (53.88%) of the patients were bitten by venomous snakes requiring systemic therapy and 101 (46.12%) were non-venomous. Of the 118 patients with venomous snakebite, 78 (35.62%) had signs and symptoms. 83.11% reported to the hospital within 6 hours of the bite, while 45.66% within 2 hours. There were 169 (77.17%) patients who had local signs of inflammation, ischemic changes in 28 (12.79%), compartment syndrome in 15 (6.88%). 167 (76.26%) patients were treated conservatively while 52 (23.74%) had to undergo surgical interventions. Those undergoing surgical interventions had longer hospital stays (mean=8.09615) as compared to those treated conservatively (mean=4.82635) (p value=< 0.001). In patients with no local inflammation, only 1 (0.46%) required surgical intervention as compared to 51 (23.29%) (p value=< 0.001) patients with local inflammation requiring surgical intervention.
Conclusions: Along with systemic medical treatment, local manifestations of most snakebites can be well managed with suitable surgical intervention. Surgical complications of snakebite are not infrequent leading to interventions. Such patients usually have a longer hospital stay.
References
Madsen W, Elfar J. Snake bites. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(10):1700-2.
Warrell DA. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):77-88.
Chattopadhyay A, Patra RD, Shenoy V, Kumar V, Nagendhar Y. Surgical implications of snakebites. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71(5):397-9.
Laohawiriyakamol S, Sangkhathat S, Chiengkriwate P, Patrapinyokul S. Surgery in management of snake envenomation in children. World J Pediatr. 2011;7(4):361-4.
Chaudhari TS, Patil TB, Paithankar MM, Gulhane RV, Patil MB. Predictors of mortality in patients of poisonous snake bite: Experience from a tertiary care hospital in Central India. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4(2):101-7.
Nazim MH, Gupta S, Hashmi S, Zuberi J, Wilson A, Roberts L, Karimi K. Retrospective review of snake bite victims. W V Med J. 2008;104(5):30-4.
Punde DP. Management of snake-bite in rural Maharashtra: a 10-year experience. Natl Med J India. 2005;18(2):71-5.
Kim YH, Choi JH, Kim J, Chung YK. Fasciotomy in compartment syndrome from snakebite. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(1):69-74.
Wagener M, Naidoo M, Aldous C. Wound infection secondary to snakebite. S Afr Med J. 2017;107(4):315-9.
Turkmen A, Temel M. Algorithmic approach to the prevention of unnecessary fasciotomy in extremity snake bite. Injury. 2016;47(12):2822-7.
Rha JH, Kwon SM, Oh JR, Han BK, Lee KH, Kim JH. Snakebite in Korea: A Guideline to Primary Surgical Management. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(5):1443-8.
Silveria PV, Sde AN. Non-venomous snake bite and snake bite without envenoming in a Brazilian teaching hospital. Analysis of 91 cases. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1992;34(6):499-503.
Narvencar K. Correlation between timing of ASV administration and complications in snake bites. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006;54:717-9.
Wagner HE, Barbier P, Frey HP, Janggen FM, Rothen HU. Acute compartment syndrome following snake bite. Chirurg. 1986;57(4):248-52.
