Published: 2017-01-04

Effect of meals with varying glycemic index on blood glucose response in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Maulik S. Nayak, Sunil S. Patani, Reenu Sharma, Rita Shah


Background: In diabetes mellitus (DM) glucose is underused, producing hyperglycaemia. Dietary interventions would be effective in management of glycemic control in DM. The glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) takes into account the glycemic response. Foods with contrasting GI when incorporated into a meal are able to differentially modify glycemia. Currently there is no universal approach to the optimal dietary strategy for DM. Also, little is known about whether this is dependent on the size and composition of the meal. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the blood glucose response to mixed meals (with varying GI and GL) served to Type 2 DM subjects and to determine the relationship between GI, GL and Postprandial Plasma glucose levels (PPG) in Type 2 DM.

Methods: This study included 30 Type 2 DM subjects and 30 Non Diabetic Subjects. The subjects were served Hospital based and Home based diet. The FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) and PPG values were analysed for comparing the effect of both the diets on plasma glucose levels.

Results: After analysis of study data we found that plasma glucose response (FPG-126±6.1 mg/dl, PPG-144.3±4.5 mg/dl) for hospital based low GI meals is significantly lower (p <0.0001) than after one week follow up home based mixed GI meals, (FPG-135±4.5 mg/dl, PPG 158.3±4.5 mg/dl).

Conclusions: It was concluded in the study that Plasma Glucose shows a positive response to high GI foods and this may aggravate the hyperglycemia already present in Type 2 DM. Low GI diets may be helpful in reducing risks related to Type 2 DM.



Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Glycemic index, Glycemic load, Hyperglycemia

Full Text:



Scripps laboratories Publication. Microalbuminuria in Diabetes Mellitus. Summer. 1999;13:1.

Sahyoun NR, Anderson AL, Tylavsky FA, Lee JS, Sellmeyer DE, Harris TB. Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load and the risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1:126-31.

Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic Index of Foods: A Physiological Basis for Carbohydrate Exchange.Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34(3):362-6.

Villegas R, Liu S, Gao YT, Yang G, Li H, Zheng W, et al. Prospective Study of Dietary Carbohydrates, Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Middle-aged Chinese Women. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2310-6.

Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, CullCA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular andmicrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. British Medical Journal 2000;321:405–12.

Kasper DL, Brunwald E, Fauci AS, Hauser SN, Longo DL, Jemeson JL. HARRISON’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th Edition, page 2152-80.

Lauren Gellar, Tonja R. Nansel. High and Low Glycemic Index Mixed Meals and Blood Glucose in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes or Impaired Glucose Tolerance. J Pediatr. 2009;154(3):455-8.

Burani J, Longo PJ. Low–Glycemic Index CarbohydratesAn Effective Behavioral Change for Glycemic Control and WeightManagement in 97 Patients With Type 1and 2 Diabetes. The Diabetes EDUCATOR. 2006;32:1.

Sandhu K, Sachdeva R. Efficacy of Chromium Supplementation and Nutrition Counseling on Glycemic Index and Lipid Profile in Male NIDDM Patients . J Hum Ecol. 2011;35(3):181-7.

Parikh P, Mani U, Iyer U. Role of spirulina in control of glycemia and lipemia in type 2 diabetic mellitus. J Med Food. 2001;4(4):193-9.

Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.

Willett W, Manson JA, Simin Liu Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(suppl):274S-80S.