Role of triple phase computed tomography findings for evaluation of hepatic lesions


  • Chandra Prakash Ahirwar Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
  • Abhijit Patil Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
  • Neelam Soni Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh



Benign, Malignant, Hepatic masses, Arterial phase, Portal venous phase, Delayed phase, Triple phase CT


Background: Liver is prone to various diseases including benign and malignant because of its major function of digestion, detoxification and rich blood supply by hepatic artery and portal vein. Objectives of the study were to study the characteristic features of various hepatic lesions using triple phase CT as diagnostic modality, differentiating benign hepatic lesions from malignant and correlating findings of triple phase CT with clinical, histopathology or post-operative findings for calculation of its efficacy.

Methods: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study done in Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. All patients underwent triple phase CECT examination and its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity was calculated.

Results: Triple phase CT  be excellent diagnostic modality for characterisation and better evaluation of hepatic masses with sensitivity of 91.3% , specificity 97.8% , PPV 91.3% and NPV 97.8% (p value<0.001 , kappa value 0.847). Malignant hepatic lesions can be diagnosed by triphasic CT with accuracy of 93 %, sensitivity and specificity of 93.3% and 92.5% respectively and with PPV and NPV of 94.9% and 90.2% respectively

Conclusions: Triple phase CT with high accuracy is helpful in confident diagnosis of a hepatic lesion. It has an indispensible role in characterizing, evaluating and differentiating benign and malignant hepatic lesions which helps in guiding appropriate management plan with proper surgical triage. It is also helpful in reaching primary malignancy diagnosis in cases of multiple liver metastases from unknown primary.



Anatomy and physiology of the liver - Canadian Cancer Society. Retrieved 2015-06-26.

Abdel-Misih SR, Bloomston M. Liver Anatomy. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2010;90(4):643-53.

Sinnatamby CS. Last's Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 10th Ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1999.

Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR, Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ. Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:679-685.

Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Rockette HE Jr. Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging. AJR. 1996;167:71-7.

Atasoy C, Akyar S. Multidetector CT: contributions in liver imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52(1):2-17.

Boll DT, Merkle EM. Liver: Imaging Techniques, and Diffuse Diseases. In: Haaga JR, Dogra VS, Forsting M, Gilkeson RC, Ha KH, Sundaram M editors. CT &MRI of whole body. 5th ed. Mosby: Inc. 2009.

Oto A, Kulkarni K, Nishikawa R, Baron RL. Contrast enhancement of hepatic hemangiomas on multiphase MDCT: Can We Diagnose hepatic hemangiomas by comparing enhancement with blood pool?. AJR. 2010;195:381-6.

Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M. Characterization of benign hepatic tumors arising in fatty liver with SonoVue and pulse inversion US. Abdom-Imaging. 2007;32(1):84-91.

Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M. Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology. 2000;214:861-8.

Blachar A, Federle MP, Ferris JV. Radiologists’ performance in the diagnosis of liver tumors with central scars by using specific CT criteria. Radiology. 2002;223(2):532-39.

Kassarjian A, Zurakowski D, Dubois J, Paltiel HJ, Fishman SJ, Burrows PE. Infantile hepatic hemangiomas: clinical and imaging findings and their correlation with therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):785-95.

Keslar PJ, Buck JL, Selby DM. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver revisited. RadioGraphics. 1993;13(3):657-70.

Levy AD, Murakata LA, Abbott RM, Rohrmann CA Jr. From the archives of the AFIP. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):387-413.

Palacios E, Shannon M, Solomon C, Guzman M. Biliary cystadenoma: ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Gastrointest Radiol. 1990;15:313-16.

Buetow PC, Midkiff RB. Primary malignant neoplasms in the adult. MagnReson Imaging Clin N Am. 1997;5:289-318.

Lee KHY, O’Malley ME, Haider MA, Hanbidge A. Triple phase MDCT of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR. 2004;182:643-49.

Gazelle SG, Saini S, Mueller P. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Radiology imaging and intervention. Thieme. 1998.

Chung EM, Cube R, Lewis RB, Conran RM. Pediatric liver masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation part 1- benign tumors. RadioGraphics. 2010;30:801-26.

Bloom CM, Langer B, Wilson SR. Role of US in the detection, characterization, and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. RadioGraphics 1999;19:1199-218.

Sainani NI, Onofrio A, Catalano, Nagaraj Setty, Holalkere, Zhu AX, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques. RadioGraphics. 2008;28:1263-87.

Foley D, Kerimoglu U. Abdominal MDCT: Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI. 2004;25:122-44.

Fazelle GS, Lee MJ, Hahn PF. US, CT & MRI of Primary and secondary liver lymphoma. J Comp Ass Tom. 1994;18:412-15.

Manzella A, Borba-Filho P, D'Ippolito G, Farias M. Abdominal Manifestations of Lymphoma: Spectrum of Imaging Features; ISRN Radiology. 2013(2013), Article ID 483069.

Chauhan U, SolankiR, Udiya A, Shetty G, Narula M. Triple Phase Computed Tomography In Hepatic Masses. Journal Medical Thesis. 2015; 3(1):23-30.




How to Cite

Ahirwar, C. P., Patil, A., & Soni, N. (2017). Role of triple phase computed tomography findings for evaluation of hepatic lesions. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(8), 3576–3583.



Original Research Articles