Comparative study between breast conservative surgery and modified radical mastectomy in early stage of breast carcinoma in a tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Syeda Mehbuba Joty Department of General Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Noshin Saiyara Department of General Surgery, East Midlands, UK
  • M. Tareq Anwar Shishir NITOR, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Faridul Islam Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency, UK
  • Mahidur Rahman Khan Department of Cardiology, Enam Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Ashok Kumar Sarker Department of General Surgery, Enam Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • S. M. Mortaza Ahsan Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sheikh Russel National Gastro-Liver Institute and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohsin Tonoy Nuh Department of General Surgery, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20230562

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Breast conservative surgery, MRM

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women globally, with two million new cases and more than half a million deaths each year. Surgery is the key component of treating breast cancer and there are two primary types of breast surgery available: breast conservative surgery and modified radical mastectomy. The aim of this study was to compare BCS and MRM in the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study that involved 74 patients and was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital and Enam Medical College & Hospital with an 18-months minimum follow-up. The time frame for inclusion was from July 2018 through July 2020. There were two patient groups, 37 patients in Group A who underwent breast conservative surgery and Group B was made up of 37 individuals who had MRM for early-stage breast carcinoma.

Results: With a mean age of 47.65 years in the BCS group and 48.19 years in the MRM group, the operative time for BCS was 1.04±0.25 hours, whereas 3.20±0.48 hours for MRM. Statistically significant higher amount of post-operative drainage volume in MRM group compared to BCS group (p value=0.000). With an excellent aesthetic outcome rate in BCS group (p value<0.0001) as well as better quality of life than MRM group.

Conclusions: Breast conservative surgery and modified radical mastectomy are both oncologically safe treatments for early-stage breast cancer with multidisciplinary approach. BCS offers less trauma, infection and hospital stay; better aesthetic outcome and quality of life than MRM, making it more deserving of being promoted clinically in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Global Cancer Observatory. Breast cancer. World Heal Organ. 2018;876:2018-9.

Davis LE, Fulton C, Bubis LD. Patient-reported symptoms following mastectomy alone or lumpectomy plus radiation for early stage breast cancer: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175(3):721-31.

Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(15):1938-43.

Lee JB, Kim DH, Min BW, Ryu KW, Um JW, Kim AR, et al. Factors influencing the recurrence of breast cancer following modified radical mastectomy. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc. 2001;4:128-35.

Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143-50.

McCready D, Holloway C, Shelly W, Down N, Robinson P, Sinclair S, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg. 2005;48:185-94.

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233-41.

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227-32.

Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, During M. Long-term results of € breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG82TM protocol. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:672-81

Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134(12):1311-8.

Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer. 2003;98(4):697-702.

Van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158-70.

De Boniface J, Frisell J, Bergkvist L, Andersson Y. Breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation offers survival benefits over mastectomy without irradiation. Br J Surg. 2018;105(12):1607-14.

Hofvind S, Holen Å, Aas T, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Akslen LA. Women treated with breast conserving surgery do better than those with mastectomy independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(10):1417-22.

Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):267-74.

Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J. Socioeconomic status differs between breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast conservation, and affects patient-reported preoperative information. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;179(3): 721-9.

Pathirana TI, Jackson CA. Socioeconomic status and multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2018;42(2):186-94.

Lundqvist A, Andersson E, Ahlberg I, Nilbert M, Gerdtham U. Socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer incidence and mortality in Europe-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2016; 26(5):804-13.

Dreyer MS, Nattinger AB, McGinley EL, Pezzin LE. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(1):1-8.

Agarwal S, Ying J, Boucher KM, Agarwal JP. The association between socioeconomic factors and breast cancer-specific survival varies by race. PLoS One. 2017;12(12): e0187018.

Vona-Davis L, Rose DP. The influence of socioeconomic disparities on breast cancer tumor biology and prognosis: a review. J Womens Health. 2009;18(6):883-93.

Halmin M, Bellocco R, Lagerlund M, Karlsson P, Tejler G, Lambe M. Long-term inequalities in breast cancer survival: a ten-year follow-up study of patients managed within a National Health Care System (Sweden). Acta Oncol. 2008;47(2):216-24.

Janni W. Quality of life infuenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer-long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(6):542-8.

Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Sauer H, Hölzel D. Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J. 2004;10(3):223-31.

Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Ries LA, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Edwards BK. Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(21):1571-9.

Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, Beck JR, Ross E, Wong YN, et al. Time to Surgery and Breast Cancer Survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(3):330-9.

Mansell J, Weiler-Mithoff E, Stallard S, Doughty JC, Mallon E, Romics L. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy. Breast. 2017;32:179-85.

TenofskyPL, Dowell P, Topalovski T, Helmer SD. Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2014; 207(3):398-402.

Gennaro M, Ferraris C, Guida V, Tomasic G. Conservative surgery in breast cancer. Significance of resection margins. Breast. 2011;10(5):432-7.

Lambert K, Mokbel K. Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy represent a contraindication to skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: An update. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(2):e67-74.

Wang M, Huang J, Chagpar AB. Is nipple sparing readmission and length of stay compared to skin sparing mastectomy? Am J Surg. 2020;219(6): 1030-5.

Rezai M, Kraemer S, Kimmig R, Kern P. Breast conservative surgery and local recurrence. Breast. 2015;24(2):S100-7.

Lhenaff M, Tunon de Lara C, Fournier M, Charitansky H, Brouste V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, et al. A single-center study on total mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy in case of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(6):950-5.

Lim W, Park EH, Choi SL, Seo JY, Kim HJ, Chang MA, et al. Breast conserving surgery for multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):87-90.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Joty, S. M., Saiyara, N., Shishir, M. T. A., Islam, F., Khan, M. R., Sarker, A. K., Ahsan, S. M. M., & Nuh, M. T. (2023). Comparative study between breast conservative surgery and modified radical mastectomy in early stage of breast carcinoma in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(3), 794–800. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20230562

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles