Comparison of transvaginal versus transumbilical retrieval technique of laparoscopically removed surgical specimens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231348Keywords:
Transumbilical, Transvaginal, LaparoscopyAbstract
Background: Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive, safe, and acceptable technique for the removal of adnexal masses whereas specimen removal remains a big challenge due to the size and type of specimens. In this study, we have discussed the two different routes of specimen retrieval, transumbilical and transvaginal route.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 34 women with adnexal mass who were admitted for laparoscopic removal of adnexal mass. Patients were randomized into two groups, Group A included 17 women who underwent transumbilical retrieval of specimens, and Group B included 17 patients who underwent transvaginal retrieval of specimens.
Results: Basic demographic data were similar in both groups. None of our patients had intraoperative & postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in Specimen retrieval time, operative time, and blood loss. Two patients (N=2) in group A had spillage. Postoperative pain was significantly higher in group A and the cosmetic response was significantly higher in group B.
Conclusions: Both transumbilical and transvaginal techniques of specimen retrieval in the laparoscopically resected specimen are safe, feasible, and easy, but the Transvaginal route has advantages over the transumbilical route because of better cosmesis and less postoperative pain.
Metrics
References
Zhang C, Duan K, Fang F, Wu L, Xu Q, Delgado S, et al. Comparison of Transvaginal and Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ovarian Cysts. J Soc Laparos Robotic Surg. 2021;25(2):e2021.
Kilpiö O, Härkki PSM, Mentula MJ, Jokela RM, Pakarinen PI. Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial. Eur Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;218:49-54.
Amer N, Amer M, Mishra R. Minimal Access Surgery. World J Laparos Surg. 2013;6(2):63-8.
Yoshiki N. Review of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in gynecology. Gynecol Minimal Invas Ther. 2017;6(1):1-5.
Pouch of douglas: a noble. Available at: https://www.pouch+of+douglas+%3A+a+noble&oq=pouch+of+douglas+%3A+a+noble&aqs=chrome..69i57.8058j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. Accessed on 20 N0vember 2022.
A novel approach for laparoscopic dermoid. Available at: https://www.a+novel+approach+for+laparoscopic +dermoid. Accessed on 20 N0vember 2022.
Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P. Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):112-6.
Güngördük K, Gülseren V, Özdemir İA. Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes. J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;42(7):3112-6.
Yang YS, Kim SY, Hur MH, Oh KY. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery assisted versus single-port laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case matched study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):624-31.
Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05421117. Accessed on 20 November 2022.
Soyman Z, Kelekci S, Aydogmus S, Demirel E, Ekmekci E. Transabdominal versus transvaginal specimen extraction in mini‐laparoscopic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(12):2400-6.
Sefa K. Transabdominal versus transvaginal specimen extraction in mini‐laparoscopic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(12):2400-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
