Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy-a comparative study of clinical outcomes in an institutional centre

Authors

  • Noorin Fatma Department of General Surgery, Patna Medical College and hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Binod Kumar Department of General Surgery, Patna Medical College and hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
  • A. K. Jha Department of General Surgery, Patna Medical College and hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Indra Shekhar Thakur Department of General Surgery, Patna Medical College and hospital, Patna, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231417

Keywords:

Appendicectomy, Laparoscopic appendicectomy, Open appendicectomy

Abstract

Background: Appendicectomy remains to be one of the most common procedures performed by the general surgeon. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is likely to have less postoperative pain, less use of analgesics, early discharge, decreased wound infection, better cosmetics and also diagnostic and early return to routine work.

Method: This is a comparative study of 50 cases of appendicitis divided equally into two groups 25 in open and 25 in the laparoscopic which were randomly selected and operated in the department of general surgery at PMCH, Patna.

Results: In present study pain score was 2.97±0.7 for open group as compared to 1.56±0.7 in lap group (p<0.05) because of longer incision stretch of muscles and wound infection. Post operative complications like vomiting was lower in laparoscopic group with 12% as compared with 40% in open group (p<0.05) and ileus was lower in lap group with 27±4.6 and for open group 31±5.4 with p<0.05 which were significant. There is significant reduction in incidence of post operative wound infection in lap group 0% as compared to open group 32% (p<0.05). Duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly low for lap group 2±0.78 as compared to open group 8±0.89. The return to normal activity was low for lap group 14±2.11 days as compared to open group 21.7±3.7days. Duration of surgery for open appendicectomy was 48±19 mins and for lap appendicectomy was 46±15 mins.

Conclusions: Overall laparoscopic appendicectomy is better than open appendectomy in selected patients with acute or recurrent appendicitis.

References

Wray CJ, Kao LS, Millas SG. Acute appendicitis: controversies in diagnosis and management. Curr Probl Surg. 2013;50:54-86.

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910-25.

Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP. Current problems in surgery. Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surg. 2005;42:688-742.

McCASKIE AW, Sayers RD, O’ Connel PR. The vermiform appendix, chapter 76 in short practice of surgery, bailey and love’s 28th Edn, CRC press. 2023;1335-8.

Telfor G, Wallace J, “Appendix” chapter 13 in Oxford textbook of surgery, Morris PJ., Wood WC., Eds. Vol. 2, 2nd Edn, Oxford Medical Publications. 2000;180-9.

Palanivelu C. Laparoscopic appendectomy, chapter 53 in Text book of surgical laparoscopy, Shrinivas Fine Art Limited. 2002;411-24.

Russell RCG, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK. “The vermiform appendix”. Chapter 67 in short practice of surgery, Bailey and Love’s 25th Edn, Arnold Publication. 2004;1204-18.

Ortega AE, Tang E. “Laparoscopic appendicectomy” Chapter 63 in Endosurgery, Toouli J, Gosot D, Hunter JG, Eds, Churchill Livingstone. 1996;657-64.

McAnena OJ, Austin O, O’Connell PR, Hederman WP, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick J, “Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation” Br J Surg. 1992;79:818-20.

Frazee RC, Robert JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder K, Hendricks JC, Smith RW et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy.” Ann Surg. 1994; 219:725-31.

Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swantrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendicectomy with open appendicectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208-73.

Hansen J, Smithers B, Schache D. Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy: Prospective Randomized Trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:17-21.

Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronnjng H, Qvist N, Laurberg S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:200-20.

Seeney KJ, Keane FBV. Moving from open to laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2003;90:257-258.

Yong JL, Law WL, Lo CY, Lam CM. A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. J Society Laparoendoscopic Surg. 2006;10(2):188-92.

Shaikh AR, Sangrasi AK, Shaikh GA. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. J Society Laparoendoscopic Surg. 2009;13(4):574-80.

Li X, Zhang J, Sang L. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy-a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:129.

Hong-Bo W, Jiang-Long H, Zong-Heng Z, Bo W, Feng Z, Wan-Shou Q et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surgical Endoscopy. 2010;24:266-9.

Kumar S, Jalan A, Patowary BN, Shrestha S. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective comparative study. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2016;14(55):244-8.

Pradhan S, Shakya YR, Batajoo H, Malla B, Joshi HN, Thapa LB et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study. J Society Surgeons Nepal. 2017;18(2):29-32.

Niranjan AK, Kumar S. Prospective comparative study of laparoscopic vs open appedicectomy. I J Pharmaceutical Clin Res. 2021;13(3);117-22.

Vellani Y, Bhatti S, Shamsi G. Evaluation of Laparoscopic Appendectomy vs. Open Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study” at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan: JSLC. 2009;13(4):574-80.

Geetha KR, Kudva AB. Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: A comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis-Institutional experience. Indian J Surg. 2009;71:142-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-09

How to Cite

Fatma, N., Kumar, B., Jha, A. K., & Thakur, I. S. (2023). Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy-a comparative study of clinical outcomes in an institutional centre. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(6), 1949–1955. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231417

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles