Evaluating the effect on tensile bond strength between commonly used acrylic denture base material lined with two variety of soft liners after using three varieties of denture cleansers-an in vitro study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20232082Keywords:
Tensile bond strength, Soft liner, Denture cleansersAbstract
Background: Long-term use of denture causes significant changes in its supporting structures and can lead to constant pain and discomfort. Soft lining material extensively used in field of prosthodontics to improve fit of conventional acrylic resin denture for restoring optimal health of abused oral tissue showing degenerative change.
Method: Specially designed metal mould used for fabrication of 80 acrylic resin blocks. Applying soft liner between 2 acrylic sample using metal mould and grouping these samples for immersion in solution of denture cleansers. These acrylic samples were then divided into 2 groups of 40 samples each for applying 2 variety of soft liner for each group (L1 and L2). Keeping specimen in solution of denture cleanser per day for 8 h keeping each specimen 3 times a day=equals to 3 days treatment. Thus, keeping the specimen for 30 days×3 exposure=amount to 90 days (3 months) exposure and then tensile bond strength measured using universal testing machine (Instron). ANOVA test is applied.
Results: Tensile bond strength of Viscogel soft liner with acrylic based is decreased with more Polident denture cleanser followed by Efferdent, Clinsodent and least affected by water which is statistically significant.
Conclusions: The clinician should choose denture cleanser by considering the microbiologic properties of cleansers and material aspects such as the compatibility of denture cleanser with soft liners.
Metrics
References
Mohammed HS, Singh S, Hari PA, Amarnath GS, Kundapur V, Pasha N et al. Evaluate the effect of commercially available denture cleansers on surface hardness and roughness of denture liners at various time intervals. Int J Biomed Sci. 2016;12(4):130-42.
Porwal A, Khandelwal M, Punia V, Sharma V. Effect of denture cleansers on color stability, surface roughness, and hardness of different denture base resins. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(1):61-7.
Bayati OH, Yunus N, Ahmad SF. Tensile bond strengths of silicone soft liners to two chemically different denture base resins. Int J Adhesion Adhesives. 2012; (32)32-7.
Vernon, Harold M. The newer denture bases with particular reference to copolymer resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1952;2(6):794-800.
Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc. 1961;63:382-90.
Lytle, Robert B. Complete Denture Construction. J. Prosthet Dent. 1957;9(4)539-51.
Pavan S, Arioli Filho JN, Dos Santo PH, Nogueira SS, Batista AU. Effect of disinfection treatments on the hardness of soft denture liner materials. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(2):101-6.
Yanikoglu N, Denizoglu S. The effect of different solutions on the bond strength of soft lining materials to acrylic resin. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(1):39-44.
Langer A. Factors influencing satisfaction with complete dentures in geriatric patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11(6):1019-31.
Sinobad D, MURPHY WM, Huggett R, Brooks S. Bond strength and rupture properties of some soft denture liners J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:151-60.
Michael CG, Javid NS, Colaizzi FA, Gibbs CH. Biting strength and chewing forces in complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(5):549-53.
Geramipanah F, Haghighi AAM, Zeighami S. Effect of denture cleansers on tensile bond strength of soft liners to denture base resin. J Islamic Dental Association of IRAN (JIDAI) Summer. 2013;25:(3).
Dinckal Yanikoglu N, Yesil Duymus Z. Comparative study of water sorption and solubility of soft lining materials in the different solutions. Dent Mater J. 2004;23(2):233-9.
Jabbal R S, Datta K. Comparative evaluation of water sorption and solubility of two autopolymerizing soft denture liners in distilled water and artificial saliva. Indian J Dent Sci. 2016;8(4):208-14.
Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater. 1999;15(3):211-8.
Lau M, Amarnath GS, Muddugangadhar BC, Swetha MU, Anshuraj K, Das AK. Tensile and shear bond strength of hard and soft denture relining materials to the conventional heat cured acrylic denture base resin: An in-vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(2):55-61.
Wieckiewicz M, Opitz V, Richter G, Boening KW. Physical properties of polyamide-12 versus pmma denture base material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;150298.
Kawano F, Dootz E, Koran A, Craig R. Comparision of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(2):368-71.
Lytle R. The management of abused oral tissues in complete denture construction. J Prosthet Dent. 1957;7(1):27-42.
Rodrigues S, Shenoy V, Shetty T. Resilient liners: a review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(3):155-64.
Salloum AM. Effect of aging on bond strength of two soft lining materials to a denture base polymer. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(1):155-60.
Chauhan M, Aparna I, Ginjupalli K, Kumari S, Sandhya P, Mitra N. An in vitro evaluation of tensile bond strength of commercially available temporary soft liners to different types of denture base resins. J Nat Sci Bio Med. 2018;9(2):263-7.
Haraldson T, Karlsson ULF, Carlsson G. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil. 1979;6(1):41-8.
Narwal A. An in vitro study to assess the changes in hardness and tensile bond strength of selected soft lining materials, after long term immersion in denture cleansers. J Applied Dent and Med Sci. 2015;1(3).
Al-Ali AA. The effect of different denture cleansers on different color properties of permanent soft liner. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2011;11(1):78-871.