Smile designing using recurring esthetic dental proportion and aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique with porcelain laminate veneers: a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20232809Keywords:
Smile design, Esthetics, Laminates, APT technique, RED proportion, Cosmetic dentistryAbstract
Beautiful confident smile has a positive impact on the psychosocial well-being of patients. Spacing present in the anterior region makes a patient feel dissatisfied with their smile. Over the years, a number of innovative techniques have been described in the treatment of patient having spaces between teeth in the anterior region. However, a less invasive and short-time treatment procedure with satisfactory result is preferred by the patient. Laminates have a unique position in today’s dental practice. These conservative restorations are especially important for young permanent dentitions. Porcelain veneers can be considered to be very much in cosmetic dentistry because they deal innumerable advantages over any previous form of veneering systems. This case report described the technique of closure of spaces between teeth in the anterior region by applying recurring esthetic dental (RED) proportion and aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique for smile designing using laminates. The RED proportion has been stated to be an essential tool for achieving esthetics and harmony in smile. The APT technique facilitated diagnosis, communication, and preparation, providing predictability for the restorative treatment. Limiting the preparation depth to the enamel surface significantly increases the performance of porcelain laminate veneers.
Metrics
References
Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):353-70.
Cunha LFD, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dentist. 2014;112(6):1315-8.
Nobrega AS, Signoreli AFS, Mazzaro JVQ, Zavanelli RA, Zavanell AC. Minimally invasive preparations: contact lenses. J Adv Clin Res. 2015;2:176-9.
Demirci M, Tuncer S, Özta E, Tekçe N, Uysal Ö. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(9):2187-99.
Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the recurring esthetic dental (red) proportion. Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45(1):143-54.
Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2005;25(1):9-17.
Layton D, Walton T. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):389-96.
Aykor A, Ozel E. Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2009;34:516-23.
Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:457-64.
Gurel G. Predictable, precise, and repeatable tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003;15:17-24.
Gurel G. Porcelain laminate veneers: Minimal tooth preparation by design. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:419-31.