Study of comparison between skin sutures and skin staplers: 400 case studies

Vikash Lal, Tanveer Parvez Shaikh, Pranav Narayan, Sharique Ansari, Sandesh Deolekar

Abstract


Background:There are various ways the skin approximation whether be it sutures, staplers, glues, sterile tapes all of these have the same purpose of but the one which provides the best scar with least wound infection and consumes least time is the one that should be used. So here we have studied 400 patients over a period of 20 months comparing skin sutures with staplers and their outcome with respect to time consumed and percentage of complication.

Methods:A prospective type of study was conducted from January 2013 to August 2014 at Dr. D Y Patil Hospital, Nerul for comparison between skin sutures and skin staplers in terms of effectiveness and complications in 400 patients who underwent various surgical procedures. The patients included in this study were randomly selected from those who underwent various surgical procedures which were either elective or emergency with various incisions.

Results:The average time taken for skin closure by staplers is 1.84 min per 10 cm of wound & for skin sutures, it is 6.61 min per 10 cm of wound and complication rate for suturing is 30% & for staplers it is about 12%.

Conclusion:Outcome of staplers is cosmetically superior to skin sutures with overall less complication as compared to skin sutures.

 


Keywords


Suturing, Staplers, Skin suture, Sutures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Das S. The use of mechanical. In: Das S, eds. Text Book of Surgery. 3rd ed. Mumbai, India: Sterling Book House; 2001: 1-7.

F. Charles Brunicardi, Dana K. Andersen, Timothy R. Billiar, David L. Dunn, John G. Hunter, Raphael E. Pollock. Victor Fischer. In: F. Charles Brunicardi, Dana K. Andersen, Timothy R. Billiar, David L. Dunn, John G. Hunter, Raphael E. Pollock, eds. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2004: 223-248.

Robert J. Baker, Josef E. Fischer. Metabolic response to trauma & infection. In: Robert J. Baker, Josef E. Fischer, eds. Mastery of Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002: 3-22.

Kirk RM. Choose well, cut well, get well. In: Kirk RM, eds. General Surgical Operation. 4th ed. London: Harcourt Brace; 2000. 1-12.

Norman Williams, Christopher Bulstrode, R. Christopher G. Russell. Wounds/tissue repair/scars. In: Norman Williams, Christopher Bulstrode, R. Christopher G. Russell, eds. Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery. 24th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2004: 84-94.

Brendan Moran, Margaret Farquharson. Surgery of skin & subcutaneous tissues. In: Brendan Moran, Margaret Farquharson, eds. Farquharson’s Text Book of Operative General Surgery. 9th ed. London: CRC Press; 2005: 1-28.

Kanegaye JT, Vance CW, Chan L, Schonfeld N. Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomised study of cost and time benefits. J Pediatr. 1997;130(5):808-13.

Ritchie AJ, Rocke LG. Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Injury. 1989;20(4):217-8.

Brickman KR, Lambert RW. Evaluation of skin stapling for wound closure in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(10):1122-5.

MacGregor FB, McCombe AW, King PM, Macleod DA. Skin stapling of wounds in the accident department. Injury. 1989;20(6):347-8.

Orlinsky M, Goldberg RM, Chan L, Puertos A, Slajer HL. Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13(1):77-81.