Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia versus general anaesthesia: a prospective randomized study

Authors

  • Kawser Ahmed Department of Anaesthesiology, Sheikh Hasina Medical College, Hobiganj, Bangladesh
  • M. Abdullah Hel Baki Department of Anaesthesiology, 250 Bedded General Hospital, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Monira Begum Department of Anaesthesiology, M. Abdur Rahim Medical College Hospital, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Nirmal K. Barman Department of Anaesthesiology and CCM, M. Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • M. Monwar Hossein Department of Anaesthesiology and CCM, M. Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • M. Shafiqul Islam Department of Surgery, 250 Bedded General Hospital, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Shiladitya Shil Department of Surgery, 250 Bedded General Hospital, Dinajpur, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240197

Keywords:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Spinal-epidural anesthesia, General anaesthesia

Abstract

Background: The choice between spinal-epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends on various factors, including patient characteristics, surgical team expertise, and institutional guidelines. While both techniques have their advantages and disadvantages, spinal-epidural anesthesia offers an alternative to general anesthesia, potentially reducing complications and improving patient outcomes. Objective of the study was to compare spinal anesthesia with the gold standard general anesthesia for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in healthy patients.

Methods: This study was conducted at Sheikh Hasina Medical College, Hobiganj, Bangladesh. In this prospective comparative study, we enrolled one hundred patients diagnosed with symptomatic gallstone disease and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II. These patients were subjected to randomization, with fifty of them assigned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia, while the remaining fifty received general anesthesia. Subsequently, we conducted a comprehensive assessment, comparing various intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain levels, incidence of complications, recovery rates, and patient satisfaction during the follow-up period, with the aim of evaluating the differences between these two anesthesia methods.

Results: All the procedures were completed by the allocated method of anesthesia, as there were no conversions from spinal to general anesthesia. Pain was significantly less at 4 hours (p<0.001), 8 hours (p<0.001), 12 hours (p<0.001), and 24 hours (p=0.02) after the procedure for the spinal anesthesia group compared with those who received general anesthesia. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding complications, hospital stay, recovery, or degree of satisfaction at follow-up.

Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia is adequate and safe for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in otherwise healthy patients and offers better postoperative pain control than general anesthesia without limiting recovery.

 

References

Gramatica L Jr, Brasesco OE, Mercado Luna A, Martinessi V, Panebianco G, Labaque F, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed under regional anesthesia in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(3):472-5.

Pursnani KG, Bazza Y, Calleja M, Mughai MM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1082-4.

Luchetti M, Palomba R, Sica G, Massa G, Tufano R. Effectiveness and safety of combined epidural and general anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Reg Anesth. 1996;21(5):465-9.

Johnson A. Laparoscopic surgery. Lancet. 1997;349(9052):631-5.

Crabtree JH, Fishman A, Huen IT. Videolaparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter implant and rescue procedures under local anesthesia with nitrous oxide pneumoperitoneum. Adv Perit Dial. 1998;14:83-6.

Sharp JR, Pierson WP, Brady CE. Comparison of CO2 and N2O-induced discomfort during peritoneoscopy under local anesthesia. Gastroenterology. 1982;82(3):453-6.

Hamad MA, Ibrahim El-Khattary OA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia with nitrous oxide pneumoperitoneum: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(9):1426-8.

Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(4):580-2.

Aono H, Takeda A, Tarver S, Goto H. Stress responses in three different anesthetic techniques for carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10(7):546-50.

Boddy AP, Mehta S, Rhodes M. The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(3):682-8.

Alkhamesi NA, Peck DH, Lomax D, Darzi AW. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(4):602-6.

Papadima A, Lagoudianakis EE, Antonakis PT, Pattas M, Kremastinou F, Katergiannakis V, et al. Parecoxib vs lornoxicam in the treatment of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(2):154-8.

Gupta A. Local anaesthesia for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19(2):275-92.

Thomas S, Beevi S. Epidural dexamethasone reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53(9):899-905.

Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H. Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention: effect of local, regional and general anesthesia, a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27(6):612-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

How to Cite

Ahmed, K., Hel Baki, M. A., Begum, M., Barman, N. K., Hossein, M. M., Islam, M. S., & Shil, S. (2024). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia versus general anaesthesia: a prospective randomized study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 12(2), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240197

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles