Electrocardiographic pattern in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Authors

  • Javid Ahmed Khan Department of Medicine, Govt. Medical College Srinagar, J&K, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-2229
  • Aadil Ashraf Department of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Faizana Fayaz Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Delhi, India
  • Waseem Qureshi Department of Hospital administration, Government Medical College Srinagar, J&K, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233391

Keywords:

Electrocardiography, Hypertension, Ventricular repolarisation

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a major cause of poor pregnancy outcome and complicate ~6-11% of all pregnancies. When diagnosed during pregnancy, hypertension disorders escalate the maternal risk of placental abruption, cerebrovascular accident and disseminated intravascular coagulation, as well as fetal risk of intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine death and prematurity. Interpretation of the ECG is an important component in the assessment of cardiovascular adaptations during pregnancy.

Methods: In this study, 105 pregnant women (gestational age >20 weeks) with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in the range of 18 to 45 years of age were recruited and compared with the equal number of age matched normotensive pregnant women. ECG parameters were compared with those of normotensive pregnant women.

Results: There was left axis deviation in 28.6% in HDP group as compared to 10.5% in control group, while as 71.4% and 84.8% had normal axis in HDP and control group respectively, 4.85% in control group had right axis deviation there was statistical significant difference between the two (p<0.05). There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in ECG characteristics of T wave flattening or inversion in lead III, T wave in lead V1, V2 and V3, (p<0.05). The mean QTc interval was found to be 440.28±43.62 msec in HDP women and 417.42±21.74 msec in normotensive control pregnant women and there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.000).

Conclusions: ECG abnormalities seen in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) include left axis deviation, T wave abnormalities, an alteration of ventricular repolarization as evidenced by prolongation of ECG parameters, such as QTc.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Castleman JS, Ganapathy R, Taki F, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Kotecha D. Echocardiographic structure and function in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Imag. 2016;9:e004888.

Gifford RW, August PA, Cunningham G, Green LA, Lindheimer MD, McNellis D, et al. Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):S1-S22.

Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1094-1112.

Morisaki N, Ogawa K, Urayama KY, Sago H, Sato S, Saito S. Preeclampsia mediates the association between shorter height and increased risk of preterm delivery. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(5):1690-8.

Ankumah NA, Cantu J, Jauk V, Biggio J, Hauth J, Andrews W, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with mild chronic hypertension before 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):966-72.

Angeli F, Angeli E, Verdecchia P. Electrocardiographic changes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(11):973-5.

Carruth JE, Mivis SB, Brogan DR, Wenger NK. The electrocardiogram in normal pregnancy. Am Heart J. 1981;102(6):1075-8.

Angeli, E, Verdecchia P, Narducci P, Angeli F. Additive value of standard ecg for the risk prediction of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Hypertens Res. 2011;34(6):707-13.

Berg CJ, Chang J, Elam-Evans L, Flowers L, Herndon J, Seed KA, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance-United States, 1991-1999. 2003;52:1-8.

Magee LA, Pels A, Helewa M, Rey E, von Dadelszen P, Audibert F, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: executive summary. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2014;36(5):416-38.

Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S, Coffin C, Merouani A, Young D, et al. Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic changes in early human pregnancy. Kid Internat. 1998;54(6):2056-63.

Hunter S, Robson SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Brit H J. 1992;68(6):540.

Carruth JE, Mirvis SB, Brogan DR, Wenger NK. The electrocardiogram in normal pregnancy. Am Heart J. 1981;102(6):1075-8.

Isezuo SA, Ekele BA. Eclampsia and abnormal QTc. West Afr J Med. 2004;23(2):123-7.

Revathi M, SujathaV SK, Venkatachalam M. A Comparative Study of electrocardiographic changes in pregnant and non-pregnant women. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(7):2279-861.

Zangeneh M, Veisi F, Malekkhosravi S, Rezavand N, Nankali A, Rezaei M, et al. Electrocardiographic changes in healthy and pre-eclamptic pregnant women. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2012;16(4):e78789.

Schlegel TT, Kulecz WB, Feiveson AH, Greco EC, DePalma JL, Starc V, et al. Accuracy of advanced versus strictly conventional 12-lead ECG for detection and screening of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. BMC Cardiovas Dis. 2010;10(1):1-1.

Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Thilaganathan B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: an overview. Circul. 2014;130(8):703-14.

Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Kerola T, Rissanen HA, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of T-wave inversions in right precordial leads of a 12-lead electrocardiogram in the middle-aged subjects. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2572-7.

Toivonen L, Helenius K, Viitasalo M. Electrocardiographic repolarization during stress from awakening on alarm call. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):774-9.

Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:982-991.

Bednar MM, Harrigan EP, Anziano RJ, Camm AJ, Ruskin JN. The QT interval. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001;43(5):1-45.

Raffaelli R, Prioli MA, Parissone F, Prati D, Carli M, Bergamini C, et al. Pre-eclampsia: evidence of altered ventricular repolarization by standard ECG parameters and QT dispersion. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(11):984-8.

Salles GF, Cardoso CR, Muxfeldt ES. Prognostic value of ventricular repolarization prolongation in resistant hypertension: a prospective cohort study. J Hypertens. 2009;27(5):1094-1101.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Khan, J. A., Ashraf, A., Fayaz, F., & Qureshi, W. (2023). Electrocardiographic pattern in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(11), 4154–4159. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233391

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles