A cone beam computed tomography study on inter-radicular bone to determine the safe zone for miniscrew implants placement

Pramod Kumar; Soni Kumari; Mona; Padmaja Katiyar

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233160

Authors

Pramod Kumar Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Soni Kumari Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Mona Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Padmaja Katiyar Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Azamgarh Dental College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233160

Keywords:

Parotidectomy, Surgical complications, Facial nerve, Long-term satisfaction, Quality of life

Abstract

Background: This cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination aimed to determine the inter-radicular bone dimensions inside exceptional increase patterns and decide a safe region for the placement of miniscrew implants.

Methods: The inter-radicular bone dimensions have been measured at particular websites within the maxillary and mandibular arches. The measurements were taken on the coastal stage, middle of the root, and apical stage of the selected teeth. Statistical evaluation was completed to compare the bone dimensions among distinctive boom styles.

Results: The effects discovered giant variations in inter-radicular bone dimensions and the various increase styles. Class II and class III disorder exhibited narrower inter-radicular spaces as compared to class I disorder, especially in the maxillary arch. The crystal degree and middle of the root confirmed narrower dimensions than the apical level in all increase patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into the ability to secure zones for miniscrew implant placement primarily based on the patient's increased sample.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of considering growth styles whilst planning miniscrew implant placement. Clinicians have to be cautious and select suitable websites for miniscrew insertion, particularly in sufferers with class II or class III disorder, to ensure the most excellent balance and avoid headaches related to inter-radicular bone dimensions. Tailoring implant placement to individual boom patterns can enhance the fulfilment and protection of orthodontic treatments utilizing miniscrew implants.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Boonumnuay K, Petdachai S, Chuenchompoonut V. Influence of vertical skeletal pattern on cortical and alveolar bone thickness and root spacing in the anterior maxilla assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Orthodontic Waves. 2019;78(2):63-73.

Eroncy SB, Franco A, Quirino M, Do M, Luiz J, Caroline A. Assessment of cone beam computed tomography for determining position and prognosis of inter radicular mini-implants. Dental Press J Orthodontics. 2022;27(5).

Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Aditya T, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth patterns, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(1):59-70.

Garadappagari D, Moode KN, Muralidhar YR, Sreekanth C, Kranthi PR, Badepalli RR. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography. J Pharmacy Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(5):99.

Giap HV, Ju YL, Nguyen H, Hwa SC, Young HK, Jeong WS. Cone-beam computed tomography and digital model analysis of maxillary buccal alveolar bone thickness for vertical temporary skeletal anchorage device placement. Am J Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(5):e429-38.

Gibas-Stanek M, Ślusarska J, Michał U, Szczepan Ż, Małgorzata P. Quantitative Evaluation of the Infrazygomatic Crest Thickness in Polish Subjects: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Applied Sci. 2023;13(15):8744-4.

Golshah A, Salahshour M, Nikkerdar N. Interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns. BMC Oral Heal. 2021;21(1).

Jacobo LP, Abeleira T, María FC, Mercedes OR, Pedro DD, Diniz-Freitas M. Safe zones of the maxillary alveolar bone in Down syndrome for orthodontic miniscrew placement assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Scientific Rep. 2019;9(1).

Lee JA, Ahn HW, Oh SH, Park KH, Kim SH, Nelson G. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(4):460-69.

Lima A, Domingos RG, Cunha RAN, Rino NJ, De Paiva JB. Safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the infra zygomatic crest area in different facial types: A tomographic study. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;161(1):37-45.

Liu JN, He YX, Jia XT, Huang R, Zeng N, Fan XC, et al. Feasibility of mini-implant insertion between mesial and distal buccal roots of a maxillary first molar: A cone-beam computed tomography imaging study. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;S0889-5406(23)00300-1.

Mallick S, Murali PS, Kuttappa MN, Shetty P, Nair A. Optimal sites for mini‐implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in the South Indian population. Orthodont Craniofacial Res. 2021;24(1):121-9.

Matias M, Flores-Mir C, Rodrigues M, Bruno MK, Martins R, Ferreira MD, et al. Miniscrew insertion sites of infra zygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Kor J Orthodontics. 2021;51(6):387-96.

Murugesan A, Dinesh SPS, Muthuswamy PS, Ashwin SL, Alshehri A, Awadh W, et al. Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Region in 15 Patients by Cone Beam Computed Tomography at a Single Center in South India. Med Sci Monitor. 2022;28.

Paul P, Mathur AK, Chitra P. Cone beam computed tomographic comparison of infra zygomatic crest bone thickness in patients with different facial types. Orthodontic Waves. 2020;79(2-3):99-104.

Solmaz V, Hamid AZ, Sara HY, Mitra GA. Quantitative Assessment of Posterior Maxillary Arch for Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Int J Dentistr. 2022;1-9.

Sreenivasagan S, Sivakumar A. CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in the adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths, and angulation - A retrospective study. Int Orthodontics. 2021;19(3):471-9.

Stasiak M, Adamska P. Should Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Be Performed Before Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement in the Infrazygomatic Crest Area? A Systematic Review. Biomedicines, 2023;11(9):2389-9.

Trivedi K, Jani BK, Hirani S, Radia MV. Comparative Evaluation of Cortical Bone Anatomy of Mandibular Buccal Shelf for Mini Implant Placement in Different Facial Divergence: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Indian Orthodontic Society. 2020;54(4):325-31.

Wang C, Wang G, Xin C, You Q, Wu J. Oblique Plane Cutting of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis on the Safe Zone for Micro-Implants of Maxillary Molar Region. J Craniofacial Surg. 2020;31(2):397-9.