Comparison between intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy: laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy

Authors

  • Sachin Sharma Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Samir Swain Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Sabyasachi Panda Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Abhilekh Tripathi Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Tilala Yash Manharlal Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Kishore Kumar Behera Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Jatin Anshuman Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233705

Keywords:

LPN, OPN, Comparison

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

Methods: We did prospective retrospective study on 33 cases of renal mass operated as partial nephrectomy (PN) (15 LPN and 18 OPN) in department of urology and renal transplant SCB medical college Cuttack Odisha from 1 may 2019 to 1 may 2023. Surgical outcome of both approaches compared based upon intraop time, estimated blood loss, ischemia time, hospital stay, complications and rise in creatinine.

Results: Mean intraop time 140.66 min in OPN vs 172.8 min in LPN (p<0.05-significant), mean estimated blood loss was 453 ml in OPN vs 345 ml in LPN (p=0.113-not significant), mean ischemia time was 15.88 min in OPN vs 20.53 min in LPN (p<0.05-significant), mean post op hospital stay was 7.5 days in OPN vs 6.3 days in LPN (p=0.184-not significant). Intra-op complications was 2 (11.11%) in OPN vs 2 (13.33%) in LPN and postop complications was in 5 (27.7%) in OPN vs 4 (26.66 %) in LPN. Mean rise in creatinine was 0.25 in OPN vs 0.29 in LPN (p=0.642-not significant).

Conclusions: LPN is a feasible and safe alternative to OPN with comparable surgical outcomes but operating time and ischaemia time is significantly more in LPN as compare to OPN.

References

Capitanio U, Montorsi F. Renal cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10021):894-906.

Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, Stephen AB, Freddie B, Jonathan C et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2019;75(1):74-84.

Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim KH, Oh CK, Sung YP, Young SK et al. Functional and oncol-ogical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years’ follow-up. BJU Int. 2018;122(4):618-26.

Wu Z, Li M, Liu B, Chen C, Huamao Y, Chen L et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94878.

Pereira J, Renzulli JII, Pareek G, Daniel M, Ruiting G, Zheng Z et al. Perioperative morbidity of open versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a contemporary analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program. J Endourol. 2018;32(1):116-23.

Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, Klaus J, Ziya K, Ruth K et al. Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012;61(4):757-63.

Zabell JR, Wu J, Suk-Ouichai C. Renal ischemia and functional out-comes following partial nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2017;44(2):243-55.

Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, Humberto L, Remi E, Kamol P et al. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1236-42.

Chengyu Y, Yuelin D, Hui W, Lei P, Tangqiang W, Xiaojun Z et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes. Front Oncol. 2020;10:583979.

Reifsnyder JE, Ranjith R, Casey KN, James DP, Benjamin S, Shahrokh FS et al. Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy: Complication Comparison Using the Clavien System. JSLS. 2012;16(1):38-44.

Carlo AB, Alessandro L, Umberto C, Andrea M, Alessandro A, Walter A et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (The RECORd 2 Project). Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(2):390-96.

Inderbir SG, Louis RK, Brian RL, Michael LB, Denise BJ, Roberto CJr et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178(1):41-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-29

How to Cite

Sharma, S., Swain, S., Panda, S., Tripathi, A., Yash Manharlal, T., Behera, K. K., & Anshuman, J. (2023). Comparison between intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy: laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(12), 4391–4394. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233705

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles