Drain tip culture following total knee arthroplasty

Bahubali Aski, Narendra Vaidya, Rakesh Patil, Nelson Pinto

Abstract


Background: Placing a suction drain following total knee replacement is usual practice which is been followed by many surgeons. Closed suction drainage following arthroplasty is a routine with the aim of preventing wound hematoma and thereby reducing the risk of infection. Surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopaedic surgeries are disastrous and often lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Usefulness of drain tip culture in predicting the wound infection is been tested but results are controversial.

Methods: It is a prospective study of 546 drains (352 patients) who underwent unilateral or bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The drain tip was sent for culture at the time of removal. Cultures from the SSI were also collected. Cases that had at least six months of follow up were included in the study.

Results: Drain tip culture was positive in total of 18 patients. Three patients had developed deep infection and 10 patients had superficial infection. All three patients with deep infection and 9 out of 10 patients of superficial infection were drain tip culture positive. Out of 9 culture positive superficial infections, one had different bacteria identified from the wound site. Drain tip culture was positive in 3.39% of drains and infection (wound culture) was positive in 2.26% of wounds. On statistical analysis we found drain tip culture has sensitivity of 91.66%, specificity of 98.64%, positive predictive value of 61.11% and negative predictive value of 99.8%.

Conclusion: Drain tip culture positivity helps in predicting the future chance of developing the infection. If drain tip culture is negative, then there is almost near nil chances of infection.

 


Keywords


Drain tip culture, Surgical site infection, Closed suction drain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dellinger EP. Surgical infections and choice of antibiotics. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, eds. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 16th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders; 2002: 171-172.

Culbertson WR, Altemeier WA, Gonzalez LL, Hill EO. Studies on the epidemiology of post-operative infection of clean operative wounds. Ann Surg. 1961;154:599-603.

Sorensen AI, Sorensen TS. Bacterial growth on suction drain tips. Prospective study of 489 clean orthopaedic operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:451-4.

Ikeanyi UOE, Chukwuka CN, Chukwuanukwu TOG. Risk factors for surgical site infections following clean orthopaedic operations. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;16(4):443-7.

Weinrauch P. Diagnostic value of routine drain tip culture in primary joint arthroplasty. Aust NZ J Surg. 2005;75:887-8.

Bernard L, Pron B, Vuagnat A, Gleizes V, Signoret F, Denormandie P, et al. The value of suction drainage fluid culture during aseptic and septic orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 901 patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:46-9.

Sankar B, Ray P, Rai J. Suction drain tip culture in orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study of 214 clean operations. Int Orthop. 2004 Oct;28(5):311-4.

Willet KM, Simmons CD, Bentley G. The effect of suction drains after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1988;70:607-10.

Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty: Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop. 1991;264:232-4.

Overgaard S, Thomsen NO, Kulinski B, Mossing NB. Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Aug;64(4):417-20.

Murphy JP, Scott JE. The effectiveness of suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. J R Soc Med. 1993 Jul;86(7):388-9.