Tale of spontaneous passage of large proximal ureteric calculus in a male patient

Authors

  • Shivendra Agrawal Department of Urology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • N. Srinath Department of Urology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Prathvi Department of Urology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20234019

Keywords:

Spontaneous passage of ureteric stones, Urolithiasis, Proximal ureteric calculus

Abstract

Ureteric stones are very notorious. Sometimes a very small stone may require a surgical removal and sometimes a large stone might pass spontaneously. We report a case of a 43 years old male patient who presented to our department with complaint of right flank pain of 1-week duration. This patient was diagnosed with right proximal ureteric calculus (11×6 mm) at L3 level. He was planned for ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy (URSL)/push back percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patient needed time for getting financially prepared for the surgery. Meanwhile we prescribed him an alpha blocker once daily at bedtime, oral analgesia SOS and advised to take adequate hydration. On 10th day of first presentation, to our surprise, the patient came with a stone in his hand, which he has passed spontaneously, and was confirmed by a radiograph. The likelihood of a ureteric stone spontaneously passing during expectant treatment is influenced by various factors, including its size, location, and orientation within the ureter. 11×6 mm proximal ureteric stone is the largest stone passed spontaneously in a male patient in our institute and most probably in literature.

 

References

Picozzi SC, Marenghi C, Casellato S, Ricci C, Gaeta M, Carmignani L. Management of ureteral calculi and medical expulsive therapy in emergency departments. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4:70-6.

Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Katafigiotis I, Perimenis P. Role of white blood cell and neutrophil counts in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic. BJU Int. 2012;110:E339-45.

Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Perimenis P. Predictors for spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic secondary to ureteral calculi. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:71-9.

Morse RM, Resnick MI. Ureteral calculi. Natural history and treatment in an era of advanced technology. J Urol. 1991;145:263-5.

Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A. European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urolithiasis, 28th edition. In: EAU Annual Congress, Milan. 2013.

Park CH, Ha JY, Kim CI, Kim KS, Kim BH. Relationship between spontaneous passage rates of ureteral stones less than 8 mm and serum C-reactive protein levels and neutrophil percentages. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:615-8.

Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M. Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1610-31.

Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:101-3.

Ueno A, Kawamura T, Ogawa A, Takayasu H. Relation of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to size. Urology. 1977;10:544-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Agrawal, S., Srinath, N., & Prathvi. (2023). Tale of spontaneous passage of large proximal ureteric calculus in a male patient. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 12(1), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20234019

Issue

Section

Case Reports