Perception of first year MBBS students on objective structured practical examination as an assessment tool in biochemistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240211Keywords:
objective structured practical examination, OSPE, Biochemistry, Undergraduate medical educationAbstract
Background: It is an undeniable fact that assessment drives learning. It is documented that traditional practical examination has several drawbacks. Further, the subjectivity also affects the correlation negatively between marks awarded by different examiners and therefore on the performance of an equivalent candidate. The objective of objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is to reduce the chances of examiner bias and assess the students’ skills. Aim was to introduce objective structured practical examination (OSPE) as a method of assessment of practical skills in Biochemistry and to determine the perception of students’ regarding OSPE.
Methods: It is a qualitative, observational study conducted at Department of Biochemistry, Assam Medical College, Assam, India. The first Professional MBBS students were evaluated by using OSPE to assess their practical perspective in Biochemistry. A pre-validated questionnaire-based on a 5-point Likert scale and descriptive type on various components of the OSPE was administered to get the feedback. Statistical analysis used: Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 8 software were applied.
Results: Most of the students favoured OSPE as an assessment tool. About 82% of students agreed that OSPE helps to score better; 62.3% stated that OSPE eliminates bias in exams; 91.6% supported OSPE to be incorporated as a formative assessment.
Conclusions: The study favours OSPE as a reliable assessment tool for practical examination in biochemistry. OSPE is more objective and eliminates examiner bias and helps to evaluate all three learning domains - cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains.
Metrics
References
Edelstein DR, Ruder HJ. Assessment of clinical skills using video tapes if the complete medical interview and physical examination. Med Teach. 1990;12(2):155-62.
Stilman PI, Brown DR, Red Field DL, Sabora DL. Construct validation of Arizona clinical interview rating scale. Edu Psychol Measur. 1997;37(4):1031-38.
Newbie DI. The observed long case in clinical assessment. Med Educ. 1991;25(5):369-73.
Bartfay WJ, Rombough R, Howse E, LeBlanc R. The OSCE approach in nursing education: objective structured clinical examinations can be effective vehicles for nursing education and practice by promoting the mastery of clinical skills and decision making in controlled and safe learning environments. Can Nurse. 2004;100(3):18-25.
Prideaux D, Young LE, Caroll RG. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Curriculum design. BMJ. 2003;326(1):268-70.
Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):213-6.
Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676-82.
Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975;1(5955):447-51.
Mokkapati A, Pavani G, Dass SM, Rao MS. Objective structured practical examination as a formative assessment tool for IInd MBBS microbiology students. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(10):4535-40.
Badyal DK, Bala S, kathuria P. Student evaluation of teaching and assessment methods in pharmacology. Ind J Pharmacol. 2010;42(2):87-89.
Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE. The objective structured clinical examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg. 1995;222(6):735-42.
Rahman N, Ferdousi S, Hoq N, Amin R, Kabir J. Evaluation of objective structured practical examination and traditional practical examination. Mymensingh Med J. 2007;16(1):7-11.
Menzes RG, Nayak VC, Binu VS, Kanchan T, Pao PP, Baral P, et al. Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) in Forensic medicine: students’ point of view. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(8):347-9.
Feroze M, Jacob AJ. OSPE in pathology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2002;45(1):53-7.
Rajkumar KR, Prakash KG, Saniya K, Sailesh KS, Vegi P. OSPE in anatomy, physiology and biochemistry practical examinations: perception of MBBS students. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2016;3(4):482-4.
Kundu D, Mandal T, Osta M, Sen G, Das HN, Gautam D. Objective structured practical examination in Biochemistry: An experience in Medical College, Kolkata. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(1):103-7.
Pierre RB, Wierenga A, Barton M, Branday JM, Christie CD. Student evaluation of an OSCE in paediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4(1):1-7.
Hart IR, Honden RM, Walton HJ. Newer developments in assessing clinical competence international conference proceedings. Ottawa: Congress centre; 1985.
Reznick R. Does it matter you go to medical school? Med EDuc. 1999;33(8):557-8.
Sai SKG, Padmanabhan BV, Mukkadan JK. Objective structured practical examination: Perceptions of the 1st year allied health sciences students in basic medical sciences. Nat J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;10(7):1259-61.
Verma M, Singh T. Attitude of Medical students towards objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Paediatrics. Ind Pediatr. 1993;30:1259-61.
Natu MV, Singh T. Students’ opinion about OSPE in pharmacology. Ind J Pharmacol. 1994;26:188-89.
Gupta P, Dewan P, Singh T. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) revisited. Ind Paed. 2010;47(11):911-920.
Munjal K, Bandi PK, Verma A, Nandedkar S. Assessment of medical students by OSPE method in pathology. J Medi Upd. 2012;7(1):2-7.
Azeem MA. A brief overview regarding various aspects of Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE): Modifications as per local needs. Pak J Physiol. 2007;3(2):1-3.
Bhat D, Murugesh P, Pushpa NB. Objective structured practical examination: As an assessment tool in newly introduced competency based anatomy curriculum. Ind J Clin Anat Physiol. 2020;7(1):81-6.