Knowledge, attitude and practices of pregnant women for antenatal care during COVID-19 pandemic

Ajay K. Singh; Promila K. Goel; Sukhmanpreet Kaur; Vishal K. Goel

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20234000

Authors

Ajay K. Singh Department of Health and Family Welfare, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1402-9587
Promila K. Goel MSc Nursing, Murari Lal Memorial College of Nursing, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-1633
Sukhmanpreet Kaur School of Nursing, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-0400
Vishal K. Goel Department of Health and Family Welfare, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0803-3724

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20234000

Keywords:

Antenatal care, Anxiety, COVID-19, Lockdown, Pandemic, Pregnancy, Stress

Abstract

Background: The antenatal care had suffered across the globe during COVID-19 pandemic. This study was undertaken to elicit knowledge, attitude and practices adopted by pregnant women for antenatal care during the pandemic.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken (N=126) at a purposively selected community health center Nalagarh of Solan district in north India. Self-administered pilot tested standardized questionnaire was employed.

Results: 46 percent of women were in age group of 21-25 years and had secondary level of education. 60 percent were primigravida. 47 percent of pregnant women significantly undertook antenatal care from civil hospital and 33 percent availed these services from the public health facility of the level of Primary Health Centre or Community Health Centre, χ² (1, N=126) =7.7, p=0.02. All pregnant women had taken complete antenatal care for four times and as per schedule. Only one tested positive for the disease COVID-19. Majority of the pregnant women studied were asymptomatic. The participants had the knowledge about symptoms of disease and COVID-19 appropriate behavior. About 25 percent also had difficulty in approaching the public health sector due to lack of accessible transportation. 18 and 33 percent of pregnant women suffered from stress and anxiety respectively. All undertook iron and folic acid along with tetanus prophylaxis. 21 and 18 percent practiced wearing of face mask and frequent hand washing with soap respectively.

Conclusions: COVID pandemic did not hinder antenatal care adopted by pregnant women. Lockdown and isolation were important perceived worrisome aspects of the disease.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/table. Accessed on 29 December 2020.

Li Q GX. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199-207.

WHO. WHO/Europe. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak-WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. 2020. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces- covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic. Accessed on 16 December 2021.

WHO. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19- 13 April 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19--13-april-2020. Accessed on 16 March 2021.

CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy, Breastfeeding, or Caring for Newborns (Online). Centers for disease control and prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/ 2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/pregnancy-breastfeeding.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fneed-extra-precautions%2Fpregnancy-breastfeeding.html. Accessed on 20 March 2021.

Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Saccone G, Rizzo G, Buca D, Liberati M, et al. Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(2):100107.

Wong SF, Chow KM, Leung TN, Ng WF, Ng TK, Shek CC, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):292-7.

Bourne T, Kyriacou C, Coomarasamy A, Al‐Memar M, Leonardi M, Kirk E, et al. ISUOG Consensus Statement on rationalization of early‐pregnancy care and provision of ultrasonography in context of SARS‐CoV‐2. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(6):871.

Poon LC, Yang H, Kapur A, Melamed N, Dao B, Divakar H, et al. Global interim guidance on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) during pregnancy and puerperium from FIGO and allied partners: Information for healthcare professionals. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;149(3):273-86.

Monday P. Guidance for antenatal and postnatal services in the evolving coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2020.

Singh AK, Bhardwaj SK. Assessment of water quality in disease burdened industrializing town of mid hills of North India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2023;11(9):3280-6.

Singh AK, Bhardwaj SK. Assessment of spatial and temporal variation of water quality in mid hills of north west Himalayas- a water quality index approach. Curr World Environ. 2019;14(1):37-48.

Blitz MJ, Rochelson B, Minkoff H, Meirowitz N, Prasannan L, London V, et al. Maternal mortality among women with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):595-9.

Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, Luo F, Yu X, Zhang W, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809-15.

Sun G, Tang F, Peng M, Gao Y, Peng J, Xie H, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women suspected of coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect. 2020;81(1):e40-4.

Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(6):e759-72.

Muralidar S, Ambi SV, Sekaran S, Krishnan UM. The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic: Understanding the epidemiology, immune response and potential therapeutic targets of SARS-CoV-2. Biochimie. 2020;179:85-100.

Basu A, Kim HH, Basaldua R, Choi KW, Charron L, Kelsall N, et al. A cross-national study of factors associated with women’s perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS One. 2021;16(4):e0249780.

Knight M, Bunch K, Vousden N, Morris E, Simpson N, Gale C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population-based cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369.

Allotey J, Fernandez S, Bonet M, Stallings E, Yap M, Kew T, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2020;370.

Augusto P. Clinical course of coronavirus disease-2019 in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;99(7):839-47.