Sigma metrics as quality indicators in guiding and tracking laboratory process improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233837Keywords:
DPMO, Quality assurance, Sigma metrics, Total allowable errorAbstract
Background: To demonstrate the utility of sigma metrics towards assessing the quality of processes, and optimization of statistical quality control rules in a high-volume clinical laboratory, in a two-phase quality improvement project.
Methods: In the “pre” period, the sigma score was assessed across 25 routine high-volume assay parameters in our laboratory, comprising of 20 clinical chemistry and 5 immunoassay methods. Measures were taken to improve the analytical quality of low sigma score parameters within a 6-month period. Another sigma metric analysis was then performed in the “post” period to examine any measurable improvement.
Results: The average sigma metric increased from 6.4σ to 9.2σ. Out of 25 analytes, 17 showed a significant improvement, defined as an increase in the sigma metric by greater than 1.0.
Conclusions: The changes in sigma metric had a significant positive impact on the DPMO and reinforced the reliability of our test results. It showed that our quality control processes can be streamlined and simplified further, to optimize the frequency of internal quality control, while still maintaining the same level of error detection and analytical quality assurance. The analysis also provided additional benefits of achieving lesser errors, fewer sample reruns and troubleshooting, and improved turnaround time, for better clinician and patient satisfaction.
References
Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indcators with the six sigma scale. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;(124): 516-519.
Westgard J. Six sigma quality design and control: Desirable precision and requisite QC for laboratory measurement processes Madison, WI: Westgard QC; 2001.
Flatland B, Breickner L, Fry M. Analytical performance of a dry chemistry analyzer designed for in-clinic use. Vet Clin Pathol. 2014;43(2):206-17.
Lenters-Westra E, English E. Understanding the Use of Sigma Metrics in Hemoglobin A1c Analysis. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37(1):57-71.
Farr A, Freeman K. Quality control validation, application of sigma metrics, and performance comparison between two biochemistry analyzers in a commercial veterinary laboratory. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008;20(5):536-44.
Harrison H, Jones J. Using sigma quality control to verify and monitor performance in a multi-instrument, multi-site integrated health care network. Clin Laborat Medi. 2017;37(1):207-41.
Taher J, Cosme J, Renley B, Daghfal D, Yip P. A novel Sigma metric encompasses the global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system. Clin Biochem. 2018;63:106-112.
Fasano T, Bedini J, Fle P, Jlaiel M, Hubbert K, Datta H, et al. Multi-site performance evaluation and Sigma metrics of 20 assays on the Atellica chemistry and immunoassay analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;58(1):59-68.
Carobene A, Aarsand A, Bartlett W, Coskun A, Diaz-Garzon J, Fernandex-Calle P, et al. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): a summary report. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022;60(4):505-17.
Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario J, Hernandez A, Jimenez C, et al. Current databases on biologic variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:491-500.
Westgard J. A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx chart) for judging method performance. Clin Lab Sci. 1995;8(5):277-83.
Hyltoft Petersen P, Fraser C, Kallner A, Kenny D. Strategies to set global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7).
Sandberg S, Fraser C, Horvath A, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):833-5.
El Sharkawy R, Westgard S, Awad A, AbdelKarem Omneya A, El Hadidi I, Gaballah A, et al. Comparison between Sigma metrics in four accredited Egyptian medical laboratories in some biochemical tests: an initiative towards sigma calculation harmonization. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28(2).
Westgard J, Westgard S. Basic quality management systems Madison WI; 2014.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: Principles and Definitions Wayne, PA; 2016.
