Evaluation of Demirjian stage of the third molar as a reliable predictor of 18 years age

Pramod Kumar; Soni Kumari; Nimisha Priya; Arpita Shekhar; Krishna Kumar; Ashish Kumar

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240005

Authors

Pramod Kumar Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Soni Kumari Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Nimisha Priya Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Arpita Shekhar Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Krishna Kumar Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Ashish Kumar Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240005

Keywords:

Demirjian, Medicolegal, Third molar, Major

Abstract

Background: In accordance with section 3(1) of the 1875 Indian majority act, any individual residing in India must reach the majority age when they reach the age of 18 and not before. Third molar formation begins approximately the age of 18. This study aims to distinguish the third molar Demirjian stage(s) indicate that the individual is under the age of 18, and which do not, we will be able to determine the person's age.

Methods: In this research, 202 patients' OPG radiographs aged 14-25 years were obtained. Their radiographs revealed 742 third molars in total. Third molar development was examined using Demirjian's eight-stage method, and average age was then calculated for each step of third molar growth. Stages under the age of eighteen and stages over the age of eighteen were analyzed.

Results: Data revealed that a person was in stage C most likely under the age of 18 (minor) and at stage H, a person was most likely over the age of 18 (major). Stages A and B were not evident in the age range studied. The age associated with stage C was less than 18 years, while the age associated with stage H was greater than 18 years.

Conclusions: Assessing third molar growth stages is a reliable non-invasive method for estimating an individual's age. Stage H indicates a likely age over 18 with completed root development, while stage C suggests an age under 18 with ongoing root development, making it a quick and useful approach.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Johanson G. Age determination from teeth. Odontol Revy. 1971;22(21):1-126.

Luntz LL. History of forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1997;21(1):7-17.

Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001;19(1):9-17.

Altini M. Age determination from the teeth-a review. J Dent Assoc S Africa. 1983;38(5):275-8.

Moores CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt Jr. EE. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1490-502.

Anderson DL, Thompson GV, Popovich F. Age of attainment of mineralization stages of the permanent dentition. J Forensic Sci. 1976;21(1):191-200.

Schour I, Massler M. The development of human dentition. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941;28:1153-60.

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Bio. 1973;45(2):211-27.

Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Bio. 1976;3(5):411-21.

Harris EF, McKee JH. Tooth Mineralization Standards for Blacks and Whites from the Middle Southern United States. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35(4):859-72.

Tanner JM, Marshall RH, Healy WA, Goldstein H. Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Prediction of Adult Height (TW2) Method. London: Academic Press. 1975.

Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the Pattern of Pubertal Changes in Girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44(234):291-303.

Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the Pattern of Pubertal Changes in Boys. Arch Dis Child. 1970;45(239):13-23.

Ubelaker DH. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretations. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. 1978.

Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE. The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38(2):379-90.

Dhanjal KS, Bhardwaj MK, Liversidge HM. Reproducibility of radiographic stage assessment of third-molars. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159:74-7.

Nolla C. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254-66.

Sisman Y, Uysal T, Yagmur F, Ramoglu SI. Third-molar development in relation to chronologic age in Turkish children and young adults. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):1040-5.

Orhan K, Ozer L, Orhan AI, Dogan S, Paksoy CS. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in relation to chronological age among Turkish children and youth. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165(1):46-51.

Panchbhai AS. Radiographic evaluation of developmental stages of third molar in relation to chronological age as applicability in forensic age estimation. Dentistry. 2012;S1:002:1-7.