Significance of evaluating mandibular parameters for the identification of an individual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240218Keywords:
Age estimation, Dental, Forensic, Morphometric, RadioanalysisAbstract
Background: Estimating the age of death is a crucial step since it narrows the field of probable identities that must be compared to remains after mass tragedies. Morphological changes in the mandible are mostly driven by an individual’s age and occlusal status. The aim of this study was to determine the association of the dimensions of these parameters with the age and gender of an individual with a larger sample size using orthopantograms in the north Indian population.
Methods: A retrospective radio morphometric analysis was performed for panoramic radiographs of 300 (150 males and 150 females). The digital panoramic images were saved in Dicom format and exported to MicroDicom software for linear measurements. The co-relation of study parameters with age was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and assessment of co-relation with sex by applying student’s t-test.
Results: The mean values of the right and left gonial angles were higher in females, while the ramus height and bigonial width dimensions were greater in males. However, only the left gonial angle and ramus height showed statistically significant differences with gender (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The present study found substantial changes in gonial angle, ramus height, and bigonial breadth based on gender and age in a larger sample size. As a result, these dimensions can be an accurate predictor of an individual’s age and sex. Thus, morphometric examination of the mandible can be a useful tool in both identifying individuals and studying growth patterns.
References
Shamim T. Forensic odontology. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2010;20:1-2.
Lain R, Griffiths C, Hilton JMN. Forensic dental and medical response to the Bali bombing. Med J Aust. 2003;179(7):362-5.
James H. Thai tsunami victim identification overview to date. J Forens Odontostomatol. 2005;23:1-18.
Shahabi M, Ramazanzadeh B, Mokhber N. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with class I malocclusion. J Oral Sci. 2009;51:425‑9.
Upadhyay RB, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P, Rao NN. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. J Forens Dent Sci. 2012;4:29-33.
Bathla S, Srivastava SK, Sharma RK, Chhabra S. Influence of age on the radiomorphometric indices of the gonial region of the mandible in north‑Indian population. Int J Med and Dent Sci. 2014;3:411‑20.
Shamout RA, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, Habahbah AA. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pak Oral Dent J. 2012;32:81‑7.
Ghaffari R, Hosseinzade A, Zarabi H, Kazemi M. Mandibular dimensional changes with aging in three dimensional computed tomographic study. Journal of Dentomaxillofac Radiol Pathol Surg. 2013;2:6‑12.
Soomer H, Ranta H, Lincoln MJ, Penttila A, Leibur E. Reliability and validity of eight dental age estimation methods for adults. J Forens Sci. 2003;48(1):149-52.
Vodanović M, Dumančić J, Demo Ž, Mihelić D. Determination of sex by discriminant functional analysis of mandible from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2006;40:263‑77.
Nikenshan S, Sharafi M, Emadi N. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions. Imag Sci Dent. 2013;43:191‑6.
Jensen E, Palling M. The gonial angle. Am J Orthod. 1954;40:120-33.
Alshamout R, Ammoush M, Alrabata R, Alhabahbah A. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pak Oral Dent J 2012;32(1):27.
Izard G. The gonio‑mandibular angle in dento‑facial orthopedia. Int J Orthod. 1927;13:578‑81.
Ohm E, Silness J. size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:883‑91.
Sperber GH, edr. Craniofacial Development. Canada: BC Decker Inc.; 2001:130.
Rajkumari S, Nikitha K, Monisha S, Nishagrade S, Thayumanavan B, Murali BA. Role of orthopantamograph in forensic identification: a retrospective study among Chennai population. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2019;11:S393‑6.
Pillay S, Ishwarkumar S, Gama DBZ, Pillay P. The morphometry of the angle of mandible and its correlation with age and sex in the eThekwini metropolitan region: a panoramic study. Int J Morphol. 2017;35:661‑6.
Bhuyan R, Mohanty S, Bhuyan S, Pati A, Priyadarshini S, Das P. Panoramic radiograph as a forensic aid in age and gender estimation: Preliminary retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22:266‑70.
2Moron CL, Gimeno JAS. Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender. Ann Anat. 2018;215:93‑6.
Huumonen S, Sipila K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Soderholm AL, Remes LT, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:34‑8.
Pecora NG, Baccetti T, Mcnamara JA. The aging craniofacial complex: a longitudinal cephalometric study from late adolescence to late adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:496‑505.
