Sonomammographic and sonoelastographic evaluation of benign and malignant breast lesions and its correlation with fine needle aspiration cytology

Khushboo Gour; Rikta Mallik; Anisha Mondal; Abhishek Mondal

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240527

Authors

Khushboo Gour Department of Radio-diagnosis, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India
Rikta Mallik Department of Radio-diagnosis, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India
Anisha Mondal Department of Radio-diagnosis, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India
Abhishek Mondal Department of Radio-diagnosis, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240527

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Elastography, FNAC, Ultrasound

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer affects 25.8% of women worldwide. Mammography and ultrasound have sensitivity, but invasive breast biopsies and aggressive biopsies are essential. Sonoelastography is a non-invasive imaging method that can measure tissue stiffness related to different pathologic conditions, such as cancer. Objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of sonomammography and sonoelastography in diagnosing breast lesions as benign or malignant in correlation with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as gold standard.

Methods: This study was conducted on 52 female patients with breast mass and sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), kappa and p value of conventional gray scale ultrasound and ultrasonography (USG) elastography were calculated and compared with that of FNAC. Ultrasound was performed using grayscale and elastography mode on GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound equipment with a 7-12 MHz linear-array transducer. All cases with breast lesions identified on ultrasound elastography underwent FNAC.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of sonoelastography were 78.5, 94.7, 84.6, 92.3 with kappa 0.75 and p value <0.0001. Similarly, sensitivity and specificity for strain ratio were 85.7 and 97.4, and that for size ratio were 85.7 and 100 respectively. These results are comparable to or better than results for conventional ultrasound.

Conclusions: Breast elastography makes it easier to classify BIRADS 3 category lesions which are benign but still confused as malignant on conventional USG. BIRADS category 3 and 4 lesions with benign findings on sonoelastography can be downgraded to category 2 and 3 respectively thus reducing the number of false positive malignancy cases and biopsy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341-50.

Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging. 1991;13(2):111-34.

Fleury EF. The importance of breast elastography added to the BI-RADS (5th edition) lexicon classification. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61(4):313-6.

Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(4):289-95.

Zaidi SMH, Waseem HF, Ansari FA, Irfan M, Fahim S. Sample size estimation of diagnostic test studies in health sciences Proc. 14th International Conference on Statistical Sciences Karachi, Pakistan. 2016;29:239-46.

Gong X, Wang Y, Xu P. Application of Real‐time Ultrasound Elastography for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 2013,32:2171-6.

Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S, Canale S, Sethom S, Al Rouhbane R, et al. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):503-13.

Singh M, Pradhan D, Sahu BK, Panigrahy P, Swain BM, Mohanty J. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound elastography in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast masses in correlation with mammography, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and biopsy. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2020;7(8):H4-10.

Menezes R, Sardessai S, Furtado R, Sardessai M. Correlation of Strain Elastography with Conventional Sonography and FNAC/Biopsy. J Clin Diagnost Res. 2016;10(7):0510.

Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, Franceschini G, Mulè A, Bonomo L. Characterization of solid breast masses use of the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:649-59.

Krithika S, Ilangovan G, Balganesan H, Pavithra A. Ultrasound evaluation of palpable breast masses in correlation with fine needle aspiration cytology. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol. 2020;5(2):B27-33.

Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bergonzini R, Bellarosa S, Angelini O, et al. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med. 2006;111:440-8.

Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, Morton MJ, Nordland MR, Meixner DD, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging-clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology. 2006;238:425-37.

Kocjan G, Bourgain C, Fassina A, Hagmar B, Herbert A, Kapila K, et al. The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice. Cytopathology. 2008;19(5):271-8.

Khaleel M. Correlating Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Results of Mammary Malignancy with Corresponding Ultrasound BIRADS Score. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2022;7(1):37-40.

Dietrich CF, Barr RG, Farrokh A, Dighe M, Hocke M, Jenssen C, et al. Strain Elastography - How To Do It? Ultrasound Int Open. 2017;3(4):E137-49.

Zhao QL, Ruan LT, Zhang H, Yin YM, Duan SX. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5point score and strai n ratio method. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3245.