A 22-year study to evaluate disparities in place of death in the United States using the CDC WONDER database for intracerebral hemorrhage

Authors

  • Ananya Lade Department of Internal Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre City, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Kevin G. Chaverri Alpizar Department of Internal Medicine, University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
  • Amrutha Nachu Department of Internal Medicine, NRI Academy of Medical Science, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Ramita Goel Himalayan Institute of Medical sciences, Dehradun, UT, Karnataka, India
  • Jaymin Pansuriya Department of Internal Medicine, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Navya Pillikunte Doddareddy Department of Internal Medicine, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Abirami Saravanan Department of Surgery, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241884

Keywords:

Demographic disparity, Hospice care, Healthcare disparity, ICH, Death

Abstract

Background: Interpretation of data collected from the CDC WONDER database and analysis of disparities in places of death for those patients diagnosed with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Our research intends to uncover important insights into potential differences in end-of-life care for patients suffering from ICH and to provide solicited care during this crucial time.

Methods: We conducted an epidemiological study in which all patient-specific demographics were extracted from the CDC WONDER database evaluated for disparities in place of death, and compared based on variables. The odds ratio was also calculated. Qualitative data was expressed in percentage and proportion, whereas statistical analysis was done using R programming software.

Results: Data of 18,783,791 ICH deaths was aggregated. Data explained that patients in the 85+ age group are the most likely to die at home, and this particular age group also has seen the highest number (1,941,657) of fatalities in home or hospice and the highest number (4,937,395) of fatalities in medical or nursing facilities. Male patients in the 55–64 age group were most likely to die at home or hospice, whereas female patients in general were most likely to die in medical or nursing facilities. West census region patients were 1.424 times more likely to die at home or hospice, this number being the highest of all regions.

Conclusions: Home or hospice mortality trend in patients with ICH, within a 22-year period, increased significantly, specifically in white male patients ages 85 and older from the west rural region.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bernat JL, Culver CM, Gert B. On the definition and criterion of death. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94(3):389-394.

Froggatt K, Payne S. A survey of end‐of‐life care in care homes: issues of definition and practice. Health Social Care Community. 2006;14(4):341-8.

Zimmerman S, Sloane PD, Hanson L, Mitchell CM, Shy A. Staff perceptions of end-of-life care in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003;4(1):23-6.

Kase CS, Hanley DF. Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Advances in Emergency Care. Neurol Clin. 2021;39(2):405-18.

Pinho J, Costa AS, Araújo JM, Amorim JM, Ferreira C. Intracerebral hemorrhage outcome: A comprehensive update. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:54-66.

Weimar C, Kleine-Borgmann J. Epidemiology, Prognosis and Prevention of Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(15):2193-6.

Otite FO, Khandelwal P, Malik AM, Chaturvedi S, Sacco RL, Romano JG. Ten-Year Temporal Trends in Medical Complications After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the United States. Stroke. 2017;48(3):596-603.

Carlsson M, Wilsgaard T, Johnsen SH. Temporal Trends in Incidence and Case Fatality of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The Tromsø Study 1995-2012. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2016;6(2):40-9.

Rincon F, Mayer SA. The epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage in the United States from 1979 to 2008. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(1):95-102.

Pedersen TGB, Vinter N, Schmidt M. Trends in the incidence and mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage, and the associated risk factors, in Denmark from 2004 to 2017. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(1):168-77.

Stein M, Misselwitz B, Hamann GF, Scharbrodt W, Schummer DI, Oertel MF. Intracerebral hemorrhage in the very old: future demographic trends of an aging population. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1126-8.

Wang DZ, Xue XD, Zhang H, Xu ZL, Zhang Y, Song GD, et al. The trend of intracerebral hemorrhage mortality of the residents with different characteristics in Tianjin, China, 1999-2015. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;52(4):389-95.

DeLago AJ Jr, Singh H, Jani C, Arashdeep R, Joseph S, Richard G, et al. An observational epidemiological study to analyze intracerebral hemorrhage across the United States: Incidence and mortality trends from 1990 to 2017. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31(4):106216.

Otite FO, Akano EO, Akintoye E, Priyank K, Amer MM, Seemant C, et al. Rural-Urban Disparities in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Mortality in the USA: Preliminary Findings from the National Inpatient Sample. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(3):715-24.

Zahuranec DB, Lisabeth LD, Sánchez BN, Melinda AS, Devin LB, Nelda MG, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage mortality is not changing despite declining incidence. Neurology. 2014;82(24):2180-6.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Lade, A., Alpizar, K. G. C., Nachu, A., Goel, R., Pansuriya, J., Pillikunte Doddareddy, N., & Saravanan, A. (2024). A 22-year study to evaluate disparities in place of death in the United States using the CDC WONDER database for intracerebral hemorrhage. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 12(7), 2364–2369. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241884

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles