Correlation of axial length and corneal power with refractive status of patients with refractive error in Kano, North-Western Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241870Keywords:
Axial length, Corneal power, Refractive error, Kano, NigeriaAbstract
Background: Uncorrected refractive errors are a major cause of blindness and low vision. Determination of the etiology is essential in planning appropriate treatment modalities. Aim of this study was to determine the correlation between axial length and corneal power with refractive status of patients with refractive error in Kano, Nigeria.
Methods: Observational cross-sectional study in which 385 eligible patients were recruited. Relevant history was obtained from the patients and ocular examination was done. Objective and Subjective refraction were performed. Spherical equivalent was calculated for patients with astigmatism. Keratometric readings (k1 and k2) and measurement of axial length were taken. Data was analyzed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 22.
Results: Statistically significant inverse association (r=-1.7, r2=56.8%, p<0.0001) was found between Spherical equivalent objective refraction and axial length of right eye. Statistically significant inverse association (r=-1.2, r2=53.3%, p<0.0001) was found between Spherical equivalent subjective refraction and axial length of right eye. Statistically significant inverse association (r=-0.5, r2=8.5%, p<0.0001) was found between spherical equivalent objective refraction and corneal power of the right eye. Statistically significant inverse association (r=-0.3, r2=6.4%, p<0.0001) was found between spherical equivalent subjective refraction and Corneal power of right eye. Negative correlation existed between axial length and corneal power but was not statistically significant (r=-0.0, p<0.4).
Conclusions: The study established that axial length and corneal power are the determinants of refractive status and that axial length is a stronger determinant.
Metrics
References
William J Benjamin IMB. Clinical Refraction. In: Clinical refraction, 2nd edi, Butterworth-Heinemann Publication. 2006;3-15.
American Academy Of Ophthalmology. Refractive Status Of the Eye. In: Clinical Optics. 2024;113-20.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian M H, Shariati M, Abdolahi-nia T FA. All biometric components are important in anisometropia, not just axial length. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;97(12):1586-91.
David A. Clinical Optics. In: Duke-Elder’s Practice of refraction, ed 10th. 2019;29-70.
Serge R, Donatella P, Silvio P, and Mariotti GPP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull world Heal Organ. 2008,86(1):63-70.
Christian E, Hessom R, Selvaraj S, Clare EG, Gudlavalleti V, Murthy S, et al. Refractive error in Nigerian Adults; Prevalence Type and Spectacle Coverage. Invest Ophthalmol VS Sci. 2011;52:5449-50.
Veena BJ, ghandni PR. Axial length,anterior chamber deapth. A study in different age group and refractive errors. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10):2211-2.
Afra A, Atif BMA. Assessment of biometry and keratometry in low and high degrees of myopia. Al-basar Int J ophthalomol. 2015;3(1):11-4.
Surabhi R,Poonam K,Vinita S. Correlation of refractive error with axial length andcorneal topography. Asian J Ophthalmol. 2016;15(1):25-33.
Adio AO and Onua DA. Ocular axial length and keratometry readings of normal eyes in southern Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalomol. 2010;18(1):12-4.
Khathutshelo P, Mashige OAO. Axial length, anterior chamber deapth and lens thickness, their intercorrelation in black south Africans. Africa Vis eye Heal. 2017;76(1):1-7.
Eghosasere I, Joy I and Christian ZO. The role of axial length-corneal radius of curvature ratio in refractive state categorization in Nigerian population. Isrn opththalmol. 2011;1(6):38941:1.
Badamus S.A, Ajaiyeoba AI, Adegbehingbe BO and Onakpoya OH. Axial length radius of curvature ratio and refractive status in an adult Nigerian population. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20:1328-34.
Venkata BM, Venkata SB. A study of the relationship between axial length, anterior chamber depths and corneal curvature in different refractive states. J Evid based Med Heal care. 2016;3(27):1253-6.
Hassan H, Mehdi K, Mohammed H E, Mohammed S, Abbasali Y, Hadi OAF. Association between refractive errors and ocular biometry in Iranian adults. J opthalmus Vis Res. 2015;10(3):214-20.
Thomas O, Arsaell A, Hiroshi S, kazuyuki S, Fridbert J. Reykjavak eye study on the ocular refracture components. Acta Ophthalmol. 2007;85(4):361-6.
Sahar IA, Mahgoub S. Normal range values of ocular axial length in adult Sudanese population. Albasar Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;3(2):31-8.
Tamer A R. Correlation between keratometric readings, corneal thickness and refractive error among patiens seeking for refractive surgery. J Appl Sci Res. 2011;7(12):2073-81.
Jyoti A, Prachi SA, Penkaj M, Baljeel k, Rhandhawa KDS, Avnish K, et al. Relation of refractive error with corneal curvature of the eye in adult subjects with refractive error. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;8(57):8846-55.
Sayatan D, Nirmal K, Sasmal AD. A study to correlate the axial length of the eye ball and the curvature of the cornea with the age of onset of myopia. J Evid based Med Heal Care. 2017;4(42):2541-5.
Jin Z. Correlation of axial length and corneal curvature with dioptre in eyes of adults with anisometropia. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13639-43.
Mei JC, Yin TL,Chia CT,Yen CC, Ching K, Chou SML. Relationship between Central Corneal Thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length in normal Taiwanese Chinese adults. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2009;72(3):133-7.
Khathutshelo P, Mashige O, Alabi O. Corneal parameters and their correlations with refractive error, axial length, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness in black South Africans. Int eye Sci. 2017;17(4):597-603.
Araoye MO. Sample size for comparison groups in research methodology with statistics for health and social sciences, Ilorin, Nigeria. Nathadex Publications. 2003;117-20.
Tahra A, David P, Rejean M. Correlation between refractive error,corneal power,and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Arvo J. 2011;52(3):1235-42.