The study of computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of acute stroke

Rakesh C. Nayak; Kushal B. Gehlot; Tarun K. Rahlot; Narendra R. Kardam; Mayank Choudhary; Pratik N. Naik

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241302

Authors

Rakesh C. Nayak Department of Radiology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Kushal B. Gehlot Department of Radiology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Tarun K. Rahlot Department of Neurology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Narendra R. Kardam Department of Radiology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Mayank Choudhary Department of Radiology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Pratik N. Naik Department of Radiology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241302

Keywords:

CTA, MRA, US, Angiography

Abstract

Background: When it comes to residual lumen diameters and areas, calcifications, and stenose length, computed tomography angiography (CTA) offers genuinely anatomic, non-flow dependent information. Compared to traditional catheter arteriography, CTA is less costly, causes less discomfort to patients, and has a significantly lower risk of stroke and other vascular complications. Additionally, it is helpful when performing magnetic resonance (MR) is not recommended or is not possible. Generally speaking, CTA is more accessible than MR, particularly in emergency situations. As there are no limitations on the kind and quantity of related support equipment, such as intravenous pumps, ventilators, or monitoring hardware, CTA, in contrast to MR angiography (MRA), is well suited for the imaging of critically ill patients. Our goal was to assess how useful CT angiography is for determining the etiology of vessel occlusion and stroke.

Methods: Non enhancing CT scan of all patients was evaluated first for significant findings, after that contrast enhanced scan was evaluated and compared with non-enhancing CT scan. Direct volume rendering (dVR) is the most sophisticated method for 3D visualization. When dVR is used to create CT angiograms, the voxels of high attenuation containing information about bony structures are selected separately from those voxels with an attenuation between 100 and 300 HU containing information about contrast- enhanced vascular structures.

Results: We observed sensitivity of CTA in evaluation of acute stroke as 93.33%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value (PPV) 87.5% and negative predictive value (NPV) 88.88%.

Conclusions: CT angiography, when closely correlated with patients’ clinical conditions, has the potential to become the screening method of choice for evaluating patients with significant vascular lesions amenable to acute intracranial transcatheter thrombolytic therapy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Pandian JD, Sudhan P. Stroke Epidemiology and Stroke Care Services in India. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):128-34.

Smith WS, Johnston SC, Hemphill JC. Cerebrovascular disease, Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 20th Edition. Mc Graw Hill Education. 2018: 3068-3070.

Shetty PG, Jhaveri KS. Neurovascular application of CT angiography. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2000;10:211-20.

Taylor FC, Kumar KS. Stroke in India fact sheet. South Asia network for chronic disease IIPH Hyderabad, Public Health Foundation of India. 2012;4.

Thurnher MM, Castillo M. Imaging in acute stroke. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(3):408-15.

Rowley HA. The four Ps of acute stroke imaging: parenchyma, pipes, perfusion and penumbra. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(4):599-601.

Srinivasan A, Goyal M, Azri FA, Lun C. State of the art imaging of acute stroke. Radiographics. 2006;26:875-95.

Potter C, Vagal A, Goyal M, Nunez D, Leslie-Mazwi T, Lev M. CT for Treatment Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Code Stroke Primer. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1717-38.

Shrier DA, Tanaka H, Numaguchi Y, Konno S, Patel U, Shibata D. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18(6):1011-20.

Rexrode KM, Madsen TE, Yu AYX, Carcel C, Lichtman JH, Miller EC. The Impact of Sex and Gender on Stroke. Circ Res. 2022;130(4):512-28.

Chapa DW, Akintade B, Thomas SA, Friedmann E. Gender differences in stroke, mortality, and hospitalization among patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review. Heart Lung J Crit Care. 2015;44(3):189-98.

Bhattacharya S, Saha SP, Basu A, Das SK. A 5 years prospective study of incidence, morbidity and mortality profile of stroke in a rural community of eastern India. J Indian Med Assoc. 2005;103(12):655-9.

Smajlović D. Strokes in young adults: epidemiology and prevention. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:157-64.

Naess H, Waje U, Thomassen L, Myhr K. High incidence of infarction in the (L) cerebral hemisphere among young adults. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;15(6):241-4.

Thrift AG, Dewey HM, Macdonell RAL, McNeil JJ, Donnan GA. Incidence of the major stroke subtypes. Initial findings from the North East Melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2001;32:1732.

Goeggel Simonetti B, Rafay MF, Chung M, Lo WD, Beslow LA, Billinghurst LL, et al. Comparative study of posterior and anterior circulation stroke in childhood: Results from the International Pediatric Stroke Study. Neurology. 2020;94(4):e337-44.

Lee SJ, Liu B, Rane N, Mitchell P, Dowling R, Yan B. Correlation between CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in acute ischemic strokes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;200:106399.