Assessment of lead augmented vector left (aVL on surface electrocardiogram) for confirming atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241872Keywords:
AVNRT, ECG, aVL notch, SVTAbstract
Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) stands as one of the most common forms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), encompassing a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the assessment of lead aVL (surface ECG) for confirming AVNRT.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study and was conducted at the Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from February 2019 to January 2020.
Results: In our study 41 patients (66.1%) had AVNRT and 21 patients (33.9%) had AVRT on the final evaluation. Total 33.9% of patients had aVL notch on ECG. Among patients who had AVNRT, 46.3% had an aVL notch and among patients who had AVRT, 9.5% had an aVL notch on ECG. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Among 21 patients who had aVL notch on ECG, 6 (31.6%) male patients had AVNRT, 13 (64.8%) female patients had AVNRT, 1 (50%) male patients had AVRT and 1 (50%) female patient had AVRT.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the interpretation of electrocardiographic criteria, including the aVL notch, plays a pivotal role in confirming the diagnosis of AVNRT and guiding therapeutic interventions.
Metrics
References
Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, Arribas F, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J. 2019;41(5):655-720.
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(13):27-115.
Katritsis DG, Josephson ME. Classification, electrophysiological features, prognosis, and management of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circul Arrhyth Electrophysiol. 2016;9(5):002481.
Krittayaphong R, Sriratanasathavorn C, Pooranawattanakul S. The role of lead aVL in diagnosing atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Ann Noninv Electrocardiol. 2017;22(2):12393.
Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, Hindricks G, Jaïs P, Josephson ME, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on supraventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(4):185-264.
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):275-444.
Daoud EG, Weiss R, Bahu M, Knight BP, Bogun F, Goyal R, et al. Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(11):1390-3.
Yao Y, Yao Y, Xu Y, Tang M, Zhang S. Differentiating slow-fast and fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using narrow QRS complexes with pseudo R'. Pac Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;43(1):94-101.
Cosio FG, Klein GJ. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a rational approach to diagnosis and management. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2009;3(1):65-71.
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(11):101-98.
Jackman WM, Wang XZ, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Beckman KJ, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N E J Med. 1991;324(23):1605-11.
Katritsis DG, Josephson ME. 2013 Classification of electrophysiological types of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a reappraisal. Europace. 2013;15:1231-40.
Katritsis DG, Josephson ME. Differential diagnosis of regular, narrow-QRS tachycardias. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1667-76.
Pentinga ML, Meeder JG, Crijns HJGM, De Muinck ED, Wiesfeld ACP, Lie KI. Late onset atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. Int J Cardiol. 1993;38:293-8.
Katritsis DG, Marine JE, Latchamsetty R, Zografos T, Tanawuttiwat T, Sheldon SH, et al. Coexistent types of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Implications for the tachycardia circuit. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1189-1193.
Ross DL, Uther JB. Diagnosis of concealed accessory pathways in supraventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984;7(6):1069-85.
Kuck KH, Friday KJ, Kunze KP, Schluter M, Lazzara R, Jackman W. Sites of conduction block in accessory atrioventricular pathways. Basis for concealed accessory pathways. Circulation. 1990;82:407417.
Gregory F, Stevenson WG. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. In: Jameson JL, eds. 2018. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018: 1479.
Kosuge M, Minura K, Ishikawa T. Combined prognostic utility of ST segment in lead aVR and troponin T on admission in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardil. 2006;1;97(3):334-9.
Lim MJ. Complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. In: Kern MJ, eds. The Interventional Cardiac Catheterization Handbook. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018: 261-85.
Wood KA, Drew BJ, Scheinman MM. Frequency of disabling symptoms in supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(2):145-9.
Güleç S, Ertaþ F, Karaoŏuz R, Güldal M, Alpman A, Oral D. Value of ST-segment depression during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(3):458-60.
Haghjoo M, Bahramali E, Sharifkazemi M, Shahrzad S, Peighambari M. Value of the aVR lead in differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace. 2012;14:1624-8.
Shabbir M, Irfan M, Zahid M, Hayat A, Rehman WU, Majeed SMI. Validation of diagnostic accuracy of leads aVr and V1 in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2015;65:86-9.
Filgueiras MJ, Nardo-Botelho FM, Felix-Bernardes LC. Diagnostic accuracy of several electrocardiographic criteria for the prediction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Arch Med Res. 2016;47:394-400.
Di Toro D, Hadid C, López C, Fuselli J, Luis V, Labadet C. Utility of the aVL lead in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia. Europace. 2009;11(7):944-8.
Kalbfleisch SJ, El-Atassi R, Calkins H, Langberg JJ, Morady F. Differentiation of paroxysmal narrow QRS complex tachycardias using the 12-lead electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(1):85-9.
Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE. A new electrocardiographic algorithm using retrograde P waves for differentiating atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia mediated by concealed accessory pathway. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:394-402.
Smith R, Goldschlager N, Saxon L, Barold S. Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardias. Value of the clinical history. Circulation. 1978;57(4):603-7.