Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing leprosy: in a tertiary care hospital
Keywords:Mycobacterium leprae, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Acid fast bacilli, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Background: Leprosy, a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease chiefly involving skin and peripheral nerves and occasionally other organ systems, caused by Mycobacterium leprae. It has tormented the human civilization through time immemorial. Leprosy remains a significant public health problem worldwide, especially in developing countries like India. The diagnosis of leprosy is not always easy because of long incubation period, over dependence of clinical expertise and a lack of rapid and simple diagnostic tool, patients remain undiagnosed for longer time. Fine needle aspiration (FNAC) technique is an inexpensive, rapid and accurate procedure for diagnosis of leprosy. We conducted a prospective study evaluating the ability of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing and classifying leprosy lesions on Ridley-Jopling scale (R-J scale). The aim of this prospective study was to assess the usefulness of fine needle aspiration cytology in early diagnosis of leprosy, to identify specific cytological characteristics of diagnosis and to correlate the cytological smear findings with histopathology and to evaluate merits of relatively non-invasive procedure of FNAC over more invasive procedure - biopsy.
Methods: The study is a hospital based prospective study carried out in the Department of Pathology and Department of Skin, Venereal Diseases, Leprosy, N.S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Jabalpur (M.P.) September 2010 to September 2013. Patients with new skin lesions were selected for the study. FNAC was performed and aspirates were evaluated for cytology using Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (H&E staining), Ziehl-Neelsen staining (ZN staining) and punch biopsy was collected.
Results: Out of 50 cases, clinical and cytological correlation was seen in 88% tuberculoid leprosy, 93.7% of borderline tuberculoid, 33% of borderline lepromatous leprosy and 66% of lepromatous leprosy. While clinical with histopathological correlation revealed 100% specificity in tuberculoid leprosy, 100% in borderline tuberculoid, 66.6% in borderline lepromatous, 83.3% in lepromatous leprosy and 80% in indeterminate leprosy and 100% in histoid leprosy in our study. The overall cytodiagnostic accuracy has been 92% in present study.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the combination of FNAC and ZN staining for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) can provide a rapid diagnosis in majority of leprosy suspected cases. FNAC is a safe, simple, rapid, less-invasive, OPD procedure for early diagnosis and classification of leprosy cases.
WHO. Weekly epidemiological record. In: WHO, eds. WHO Record No. 34. Geneva: WHO; 2012: 317-328.
NLEP. Progress report for the year 2012-13 ending on 31st March 2013. In: NLEP, eds. NLEP Report. New Delhi: Central Leprosy Division, Directorate General of Health Services; 2012.
Shantaram B, Yawalkar SJ. Leprosy-differential diagnosis. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, eds. Textbook and Atlas of Dermatology. 2nd ed. Bombay: Bhalani Publishing House; 1994: 1385-91.
Bhatia AS, Katoch K, Narayanan BR, Ramu G, Mukherjee A, Lavania RK. Clinical and histopathological correlation in the classification of leprosy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1993;61:433-8.
Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of leprosy according to immunity: a five group system. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966;34:255-73.
Ridley DS. Histological classification and immunological spectrum of leprosy. Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51:451-65.
World Health Organization (WHO). Chemotherapy of leprosy for control programmes. In: WHO, eds. WHO Technical Report Series, no. 675. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1982: 8-33.
Prasad PVS, George RV, Kaviarasan PK, Viswanathan P, Tippoo R, Anandhi C. Fine needle aspiration cytology in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:352-6.
Singh N, Bhatia A, Gupta K, Raman M. Cytomorphology of leprosy across the Ridley-Jopling spectrum. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:719-23.
Watts JC, Chandler FW. The surgical pathologists’ role in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. J Histotechnol. 1995;18:191-3.
Jindal N, Shanker V, Tegta GR, Gupta M, Verma GK. Clinico-epidemiological trends of leprosy in Himachal Pradesh: a five year study. Indian J Lepr. 2009;81:173-9.
Rao S, Singh MK, Gupta SD, Pandhi RK, Kapila K. Utility of fine needle aspiration cytology in the classification of leprosy. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24:317-21.
Shenoi SD, Siddappa K. Correlation of clinical and histopathological features in untreated macular lesions of leprosy: a study of 100 cases. Indian J Lepr. 1988;60:202-6.
Moorthy BN, Kumar P, Chatura KR, Chandrasekhar HR, Basavaraja PK. Histopathological correlation of skin biopsies in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2001;67:299-301.
Reja AH, Biswas N, Biswas S, Dasgupta S, Chowdhury IH, Banerjee S, et al. Fite-Faraco staining in combination with multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a new approach to leprosy diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79:693-700.
Bijjaragi S, Kulkarni V, Suresh KK, Chatura KR, Kumar P. Correlation of clinical and histopathological classification of leprosy in post elimination era. Indian J Lepr. 2012;84:271-5.
Mehdi G, Maheshwari V, Ansari HA, Saxena S, Sharma R. Modified fine‐needle aspiration technique for diagnosis of granulomatous skin lesions with special reference to leprosy and cutaneous tuberculosis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38(6):391-6.
Jaswal TS, Jain VK, Jain V, Singh M, Kishore K, Singh S. Evaluation of leprosy lesions by skin smear cytology in comparison to histopathology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001;44:277-81.