Outcome of pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Authors

  • M. Saifulla-Hel-Azam Department of Ophthalmology, 250 Bedded General Hospital, Meherpur, Bangladesh
  • Abrar Ahmed Nabil Department of Ophthalmology, Vision Eye Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Goutam Das Department of Ophthalmology, Brahmanbaria medical College, Brahmanbaria, Bangladesh
  • Sha Muhammad Sayem Department of Ophthalmology, Fashion Eye Hospital and Institute, Boro Mogbazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mosfica Najnin Department of Ophthalmology, BERDO Eye Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nahid Sultana Department of Ophthalmology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20243348

Keywords:

Pars plana vitrectomy, Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Scleral buckling

Abstract

Background: Variety of surgical techniques are available to treat RRD. So, it is very difficult to choose the option. Objectives were to assess and compare the surgical outcome which includes retinal re-attachment rate, functional success rate and post-operative complications between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and scleral buckling (SB) in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 60 (sixty) eyes of 60 (sixty) patients with RRD in vitreo-retina department, at NIO and H. Subjects were divided into SB group (n=30) and PPV group (n=30). Ophthalmological data were included pre-operative and post-operative visual acuity, refractive status of the eye, intra ocular pressure, presence and extent of RRD, number and location of retinal breaks, presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, status of macula and peripheral retinal degenerations.

Results: Among 60 patients, majority (30% and 36.7%) were in the age between 41-50 years in PPV and SB group respectively. In both groups, males were predominant. Majority breaks were in total 25 (41.7%) eyes in superotemporal quadrant. Subtotal RRD was highest, in 19 (31.7%) eyes in total. Retinal anatomical re-attachment was achieved in total 55 (91.7%) eyes; among them 27 (90.0%) eyes in PPV group and 28 (93.3%) eyes in SB group.

Conclusions: Scleral buckling surgery may be taken as a unique option for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery, as it is non-invasive and not accompanies with high incidence of post-operative cataract formation.

References

Snell R, Lemp M. Clinical anatomy of the eye. Blackwell Publishing; 1998.

Michels RG, Wilkinson CP, Rice TA. Retinal Detachment. Mosby; 1990.

Forrester JV, Dick AD, McMenamin P, Lee WR. The eye: basic science in practice. WB Saunders Company Ltd; 1996.

Ghazi NG, Green WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye. 2002;16:411-21.

Wolfensberger TJ. Jules Gonin: Pioneer of retinal detachment surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:303-8.

Machemer R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. XLI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:681-93.

Gabbey AE. Retinal detachment. Available from: https://www.retinal-detachment.com. Accessed on 11 May 2017.

Sodhi A, Leung LS, Do DV, Gower EW, Schein OD, Handa JT. Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:50-67.

Kanski J, Menon J. Retinal Detachment. In: Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach. 5th edn. Butterworth Heinemann; 2003:349-386.

Schmidt JC, Grossman DS, Meyer RD, Abrams GW. Surgical management of retinal detachments with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthal Surg Lasers. 2003;34:491-7.

Shipu ZR. Retinal detachment surgery outcomes: A 5-year review. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2010;36:12-6.

Bekker M. Who performs the procedure and where is it performed? Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:354.

Ahmed F, Gilmour DF, Maini R. Surgical techniques for retinal detachment: vitrectomy and scleral buckling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:944-8.

Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, Ottenberg D, Heimann H, SPR Study Group. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:803-9.

Maitray A, Prakash VJ, Ratra D. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Sci J Med Vis Res Foun. 2017;35(2):10-9.

Koriyama M, Nishimura T, Matsubara T, Taomoto M, Takahashi K, Matsumura M. Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007;51:360-7.

Cankurtaran V, Citirik M, Simsek M, Tekin K, Teke MY. Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;17(1):74-80.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Saifulla-Hel-Azam, M., Nabil, A. A., Das, G., Muhammad Sayem, S., Najnin, M., & Sultana, N. (2024). Outcome of pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 12(11), 4027–4033. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20243348

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles