“I really thought nothing could be done”: help-seeking behaviour among women with urinary incontinence

Martina Jürgensen, Susanne Elsner, Louise Schreiber Pedersen, Jessica Lückert, Elke Faust, Martin Rudnicki, Annika Waldmann

Abstract


Background: This study explores help-seeking behaviour among women with Urinary Incontinence (UI). Help-seeking behaviour is interpreted as the result of a process which is influenced by several factors, such as the appraisal of symptoms, individual characteristics, experiences within the health-care system, especially with regard to health professionals’ reactions to personal needs, social norms, and information about health issues.

Methods: The study was carried out between 2012 and 2014 in Northern Germany and followed an exploratory qualitative study design. Four semi-structured focus group interviews were undertaken with women affected by involuntary loss of urine. 49 women, aged 41 to 86 years old, participated in the focus groups. Thorough sampling of study participants was carried out to warrant demographic and cultural variation and, resultantly, the completeness of perspectives relevant to this field. The verbatim transcripts of the interviews were analyzed following the content analysis method of Mayring. The analysis combined deductive and inductive approaches.  

Results: Important barriers to seeking medical help were identified: women’s interpretation of UI as a non-medical problem, the lack of knowledge about the causes and treatment of UI, shame and taboo, and the problem of naming “it”. Also, the study results showed factors which supported women’s decision to seek medical help, notably the severity of symptoms or the women’s feeling of losing control of her bodily functions and significant parts of everyday life.

Conclusion: The results of the study allow recommendations about measures that can be taken to improve the situation of women affected with UI.

 


Keywords


Qualitative research, Help-seeking behaviour, Urinary incontinence, Appraisal of symptoms

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ebbesen MH, Hunskaar S, Rortveit G, Hannestad YE. Prevalence, incidence and remission of urinary incontinence in women: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study (EPICONT). BMC Urol. 2013;13:27.

Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1150-7.

Hunskaar S, Lose G, Syles D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int. 2004;93:324-30.

Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K. Urinary incontinence in US women. A population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537-42.

Dolan LM, Casson K, McDonald P, Ashe RG. Urinary incontinence in Northern Ireland: a prevalence study. BJU Int. 1999;83:760-6.

Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog AR, Hjälmås K, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology. 2003;62(Suppl 1):16-23.

Robb KH, Toozs-Hobson P. Nulliparous women. In: Cardozo L, Staskin LD, eds. Textbook of Female Urology and Urogynecology. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Informa Healthcare; 2006: 673-680.

Felde G, Bjelland I, Hunskaar S. Anxiety and depression associated with incontinence in middle-aged women: a large Norwegian cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:299-306.

Hägglund D, Walker-Engström ML, Larsson G, Leppert J. Quality of life and seeking help in women with urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1051-5.

Hägglund D, Walker-Engström ML, Larsson G, Leppert J. Changes in urinary incontinence and quality of life after four years. A population based study of women aged 22-50 years. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:112-7.

Melville JL, Delany K, Newton K, Karon W. Incontinence severity and major depression in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:585-92.

Monz B, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Quail D, Samsioe G, et al. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence: results from treatment seeking women in 14 European countries. Maturitas. 2005;52(Suppl 2):S23-34.

Papanicolaou S, Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D. Assessment of bothersomeness and impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence in women in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. BJU Int. 2005;96:831-8.

Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H. Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002;20:102-7.

Kinchen KS, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Fultz NH, Bump R, Obenchain R. Factors associated with women’s decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence. J Women’s Health. 2003;12:687-98.

Gasquet I, Tcherny-Lessenot S, Gaudebout P, Bosio Le Goux B, Klein P, Haab F. Influence of the severity of stress urinary incontinence on quality of life, health care seeking, and treatment: a national cross-sectional study. Eur Urol. 2006;50:818-25.

Nørby B, Nordling J, Mortensen S. Lower urinary tract symptoms in the Danish population: a population-based study of symptom prevalence, health care seeking behavior and prevalence of treatment in elderly males and females. Eur Urol. 2005;47:817-23.

Visser E, De Bock GH, Kollen BJ, Meijerink M, Berger MY, Dekker JH. Systematic screening for urinary incontinence in older women: who would benefit from it? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30:21-8.

Andersson G, Johansson JE, Garpenholt Ö, Nilsson K. Urinary incontinence: prevalence, impact on daily living and desire for treatment. A population based study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38:125-30.

Hägglund D, Walker-Engström ML, Larsson G, Leppert J. Reasons why women with long-term urinary incontinence do not seek professional help: a cross-sectional population based cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2003;4:296-304.

Seim A, Sandvik H, Hermstad R, Hunskaar S. Female urinary incontinence - consultation behavior and patient experiences: an epidemiological survey in a Norwegian community. Fam Pract. 1995;12:18-21.

Shaw C. A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behavior and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:15-24.

Shaw C, Brittain K, Tansey R, Williams K. How people decide to seek health care? A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:1516-24.

Duggleby W. What about focus group interaction data? Qual Health Res. 2005;15:832.

Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Basic principles and technics [Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken]. In: Mayring P, eds. A Book. Weinheim: Beltz; 2003.

Mitness LS. Knowledge and beliefs about urinary incontinence in adulthood and old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:374-8.

Badura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. In: Badura A, eds. A Book. 1st ed. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.

Skinner EA, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Perceived control and development of coping. In: Folkmann S, eds. Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011: 35-58.

Lachman ME. Perceived control over aging-related decline: adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15:282-6.

Lachman ME, Burack OR. Planning and control processes across the life span: an overview. Int J Behav Devel. 1993;16:131-43.

Skinner EA. A guide to constructs of control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:549-70.

Skaff MM. Sense of control and health: a dynamic duo in the aging process. In: Aldwin CM, Park CL, Spiro A, eds. Handbook of Health Psychology and Aging. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2007: 186-209.

Thompson SC, Spacapan S. Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. J Soc Issues. 1991;47:1-12.

Teunissen D, van den Bosch W, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen T. Urinary incontinence in the elderly: attitudes and experiences of general practitioners. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24:56-61.

O’Donnell M, Viktrup L, Hunskaar S. The role of general practitioners in the initial management of women with urinary incontinence in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Eur J Gen Pract. 2007;13:20-6.