Factors associated with episiotomy among parturients delivering in a tertiary care centre in Nigeria

Olorunfemi Oludele Owa, Akinbowale Romance Eniowo, Olayinka Stephen Ilesanmi

Abstract


Background: The use of routine episiotomy is now less favoured among obstetricians. Given considerable evidence, it use increases maternal morbidity without evidence to support maternal or neonatal benefit. Objectives: To determine the current rate of episiotomy among parturients delivering at Federal Medical Centre, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria and to identify factors associated with episiotomy.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted using the delivery records between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2012. Information was obtained from the delivery register and medical records. There were 802 booked patients who had singleton vaginal deliveries between the studied periods. A total of 728 of these patients’ case records were obtained for analysis using SPSS 17.

Results: The incidence of episiotomy was 9.3%. Those age <20 years, nulliparous, those who had assisted breech and instrumental deliveries had more episiotomy (P <0.0001). All the instrumental deliveries and most assisted breech deliveries (67%) were taken by the doctors. Episiotomies were more common when doctors took deliveries (Doctor vs. Nurses: 28.6% vs. 5.8%) (P <0.0001).

Conclusion: While this study has identified factors associated with episiotomy, the episiotomy rate remain within normal rate at the studied centre. It is pertinent that health care providers always bear in mind the standard indications for episiotomy. This will go a long way in reducing the episiotomy rate and maintaining the recommended WHO rate of 10%.

 


Keywords


Episiotomy, Delivery, Parturients, Records, Instrumental deliveries

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fernando RJ. Risk factors and management of obstetric perineal injury. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2007;6(8):1-6.

Johanson R. Obstetric procedures. In: Edmonds KD eds. Dewhurst’ Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynecology for Postgraduates. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1999: 308-329.

Otoide VO, Ogbonmwan SM, Okonofua FE. Episiotomy in Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000;68:13-7.

Alayande BT, Amole IO, Olaoluwa DA. Relative frequency and predictors of episiotomy in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Int J Med Update. 2012;7(2):41-4.

Fyneface-Ogan S, Mato CN, Enyindah CE. Postpartum perineal pain in primiparous women: a comparison of two local anaesthetic agents. Niger J Med. 2006 Jan-Mar;15(1):77-80.

Shahraki S, Araon S, Pourkabiriam S, Khodaee S, Choupannejad S. A comparison between early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparous vaginal delivery. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(12):1583-9.

Mascarenhas T, Eliot BW, Mackenzie B. A comparison of perinatal outcome, antenatal and intrapartum care between England, Wales and France. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:555-8.

Thacker B, Banta HD. Benefits and risk of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983;38:322-8.

Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Routine vs. selective episiotomy. A randomised control trial. Lancet. 1993;342:1517-8.

Graham ID, Carolli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):219-23.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985 Aug;2(8452):436-7.

Maduma-Butshe A, Dyall A, Garner P. Routine episiotomy in developing countries: Time to change a harmful practice. BMJ. 1998 Apr;316(7139):1179-80.

Goldberg J. Has the use of routine episiotomy decreased? Examination of episiotomy rates from 1983 to 2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(Suppl 4):S49.

Lorenz N, Nougtara A, Garner P. Episiotomies in Burkina Faso. Trop Doct. 1998 Apr;28(2):83-5.

Thompson A. Episiotomies should not be routine. In: Thompson A, eds. Safe Motherhood Newsletter. Geneva: WHO; 1997: 12.

Onah HE, Akani CI. Rates and predictors of episiotomy in Nigerian women. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;21(1):44-5.

Ola ER, Bello O, Abudu OO, Anorlu RI. Episiotomies in Nigeria: should their use be restricted? Niger Postgrad Med J. 2002;9(1):13-6.

Chigbu B, Onwere S, Aluka C, Kamnu C, Adibe E. Factors influencing the use of episiotomy during vaginal delivery in South Eastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 2008 May;85(5):240-3.

World Health Organisation. Care in normal birth, a practical guide, 1996. Available at: http://www.who.int/making-pregnancysafer/document/who-frh-msm-9624/en/.

Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000081.

Arulkumaran S. Malpresentation, malposition, cephalopelvic disproportion and obstetric procedures. In: Edmonds DK, eds. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 7th ed. US: Blackwell Publishing; 2007: 213-226.

Morhe ESK, Sengretsi S, Danso KA. Episiotomy in Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;86:46-7.