Existing challenges and histopathological review of borderline ovarian epithelial tumors

Authors

  • Richa Singh Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Eva Raman Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Preeti Agarwal Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Malti Kumari Maurya Department of Pathology, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Riddhi Jaiswal Department of Pathology, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sameer Gupta Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vandana Solanki Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shuchi Agarwal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ajay K. Singh Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20242931

Keywords:

Ovary, Morphometry, Adnexal tumors, Mucinous adenocarcinoma, Serous cystadenoma

Abstract

Background: The borderline tumour seen in the ovary can be with or without stromal invasion. Diagnosis and application of the correct criteria are of utmost importance to avoid over or undertreatment of these. We analyzed the borderline tumors reported in 2 years with respect to clinical outcome based on the morphological diagnosis and points that needed reconsideration.

Methods: Cases reported as borderline tumors in ovary were retrieved from records reviewed and follow up was recorded. Additionally, we performed a morphometric analysis to confirm the maximum size of the invasive front.

Results: A total of 467 resected ovarian tumor specimens were received, of which 266 (266/467 *100=56.9%) were epithelial tumors; out of them 54.88% were benign, 4.88% were borderline and 40.22% were malignant. The mean age at the time of borderline diagnosis was 38.66 years. On follow-up two cases among them developed further disease. One was reported from our center and one from outside, both were mucinous-type tumors. On critical review we found that there was minimal nuclear atypia in both, there was no evidence of convincing stromal invasion except few irregular well formed glands were seen infiltrating the stroma in one case.

Conclusions: A large multicenter, interdisciplinary collaboration and data-driven study is needed to reconfirm and reconsider the cut-off of 5mm especially in mucinous tumors.

References

Sobiczewski P, Dańska-Bidzińska A, Rzepka J, Kupryjańczyk J, Gujski M, Bidziński M, et al. Evaluation of selected ultrasonographic parameters and marker levels in the preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian cancers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1513-9.

Dilek S, Ozan H, Yenen MC, Dede M, Karaşahin EK, Ercan CM, et al. Comparison of tumor markers and clinicopathological features in serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors. Euro J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(1):25-30.

Halperin R, Zehavi S, Dar P, Habler L, Hadas E, Bukovsky I, Schneider D. Clinical and molecular comparison between borderline serous ovarian tumors and advanced serous papillary ovanan carcinomas. Europ J Gynaecolog Oncol. 2001;22(4):292-6.

Della Corte L, Cafasso V, Mercorio A, Vizzielli G, Conte C, Giampaolino P. Management of borderline ovarian tumor: The best treatment is a real challenge in the era of precision medicine. FrontSurg. 2023;10:1167561.

Nagayoshi Y, Yamada K, Kiyokawa T, Fukasawa N, Kuroda T, Noguchi D, Okamoto A. Clinical features of borderline ovarian seromucinous tumor. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2023;3(3):360.

Sahraoui G, Fitouri A, Charfi L, Driss M, Slimane M, Hechiche M, et al. Mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: pathological and prognostic study at Salah Azaiez Institute. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41(1).

Pecorino B, Laganà AS, Mereu L, Ferrara M, Carrara G, Etrusco A, et al. Evaluation of borderline ovarian tumor recurrence rate after surgery with or without fertility-sparing approach: results of a retrospective analysis. InHealthcare. 2023;11(13):1922.

Gupta N, Yadav M, Gupta V, Chaudhary D, Patne SC. Distribution of various histopathological types of ovarian tumors: A study of 212 cases from a tertiary care center of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. J Labo Physi. 2019;11(01):075-81.

Gupta N, Bisht D, Agarwal AK, Sharma VK. Retrospective and prospective study of ovarian tumours and tumour-like lesions. Ind J Pathol Microbiol. 2007;50(3):525-7.

Kumari S, Kumar S, Bhatla N, Mathur S, Thulkar S, Kumar L. Oncologic and reproductive outcomes of borderline ovarian tumors in Indian population. Gynecologic Oncol Reports. 2021;36:100756.

Vennu V, Abdulrahman TA, Bindawas SM. The prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes in India: analysis of the 2015–2016 national family health survey. Int J Environ Res Publ Heal. 2019;16(20):3987.

Ford ES, Mokdad AH. Epidemiology of obesity in the Western Hemisphere. J Cli Endocrinol Metabol. 2008;93(11_supplement_1):s1-8.

Howitt BE, Lee KR, Muto MG, Nucci MR and Crum CP. The Pathology of Pelvic-Ovarian Epithelial (Epithelial-Stromal) Tumors. In: Crum CP, Nucci MR, Howitt BE, editors. Diagnostic Gynecologic and Obstetric Pathology. 3th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier health sciences; 2018:865-948.

Agarwal K, Agarwal P, Singh S, Jain M, Qayoom S. Immunoexpression of CDX2 in metastatic nonintestinal adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical pitfall and its pathological implications. Surg Experim Pathol. 2023;6(1):4.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Singh, R., Raman, E., Agarwal, P., Maurya, M. K., Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., Solanki, V., Agarwal, S., & Singh, A. K. (2024). Existing challenges and histopathological review of borderline ovarian epithelial tumors. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 12(10), 3716–3720. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20242931

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles