Study of correlation between perinatal outcome, placental coefficient and feto-placental ratio

Manik Sirpurkar, Vaibhav Prakash Anjankar, Kanchan Wankhede, Lata Khanzode, Shashikala Jawade

Abstract


Background: Pregnancy and birth are nature’s finest marvel wherein perfect symbiosis between the two individuals protects the little and weak one and also allows the propagation of genetic prototype of the other individual generation after generation. Placenta acts as a mirror which reflects intrauterine status of fetus. Placenta has an undisputed role in foetal development but still is grossly neglected organ which is equal to liver, lung and kidney in function.

Methods: Placentae collected from labor rooms and operation theatres were studied for various parameters like weight, surface area, volume, area of calcification and infarction, number of cotyledons etc. Birth weight of babies was also noted, feto-placental weight ratio and placental coefficient was calculated.  

Results: Average placental weight being 490.5 gm (range 295-660 gm). Placenta of male baby was found to be slightly heavier as compared to female babies. Birth weight of male babies was also more than female babies. Average placental surface area was found to be 225.5 sq. cm. Mean placental volume was recorded as 450.5 cu. cm. Foeto-placental weight ratio was found to be 5.41:1 irrespective of sex of the baby, 5.61:1 in case of male baby and 5.40:1 for female babies.

Conclusion: The placenta is a mirror which reflects intrauterine status of the fetus.

 


Keywords


Coefficient, Embryologists, Medicolegal, Infarction, Calcification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anjankar VP, Parchand MP, Anjankar AP, Kamdi NY, Meshram MM. Placental morphometry in toxaemia of pregnancy. Schol J Appl Med Sci. 2014;2(1B):205-8.

Lakshmidevi CK, Neelam S, Raghupathy NS. Mophological studies of normal human placenta at different gestational periods. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013 May-Jun;6(3):09-15.

Goswami P, Memon S, Pardeep K. Morphological, histological and radiological study of calcified placenta and its relation with fetal outcome. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013 May-Jun;7(6):82-8.

Raghunath G, Vijaylakshmi, Shenoy V. A study morphology and morphometry of the human placenta and its clinical relevance in a population in Tamil Nadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011 Apr;5(2):282-6.

Sengupta K, Shamim A, Khandaker AR, Mahamuda B. Morphological changes of placenta in preeclampsia. Bangladesh J Anat. 2009 Jan;7(1):49-54.

Raghunath G, Vijayalakshmi, Shenoy V. A study on the morphology and the morphometry of the human placenta and its clinical relevance in a population in Tamila Nadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011 Apr;5(2):282-6.

Majumdar S, Dasgupta H, Bhattacharya K, Bhattacharya A. A study of placenta in normal and hypertensive pregnancies. J Anat Soc India. 2005;54(2):34-8.

Udainia A, Jain ML. Morphological study of placenta in pregnancy induced hypertension with its clinical relevance. J Anat Soc India. 2001;50(1):24-7.

Sinclair JG. Significance of placental and birth-weight ratios. Anat Record. 1948;102:245-58.

Fox H. The human placenta. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;13:501-19.

Saigal S, Shrivastava JR. Significance of placenta in evaluation of new-born infants. Indian Pediatr. 1970;7:68.

Kher AV, Jhawar MP. Study of placental pathology in toxaemia of pregnancy and its foetal implications. Indian J Pathol Microbial. 1981;24:245-51.

Little WA. The significance of placental/fetal weight ratios. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1960;79(1):134-7.

Udainia A, Bhagwat SS, Mehta CD. Relation between placental surface area, infarction and foetal distress in pregnancy induced hypertension with its clinical relevance. J Anat Soc India. 2004;53(1):27-30.