Benefits of using fiber post and core to restore decaying teeth: a case report and analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20243398Keywords:
Fiber post and core, Cast post and core, Aesthetic postAbstract
The post and core approach works best for treating teeth with short clinical crowns that are insufficiently strong to sustain the final restoration. The widespread acceptance of fibre posts can be attributed to their advantages over traditional metallic post materials. Additionally, fibre posts' mechanical and aesthetic advantages have given them popularity in the dental industry. Additionally, the outcomes of a few clinical trials have given therapists confidence to employ the fibre posts. For the previous six months, the primary complaint of a 23-year-old guy had been decaying teeth in the upper front area. On both sides of the maxillary central and lateral incisors, deep proximal caries was discovered. Because of the poor remaining crown structure and crown placement, the proposed course of treatment involved root canal therapy for all four teeth, followed by post and core for 11, 21, and 22. One of the many problems caused by anterior teeth decay is appearance. When such teeth are restored with glass fibre posts as opposed to the more traditional post core technique, the patients have better results over an extended period of time with fewer appointments. Glass fibre restorations, as opposed to the more conventional post core procedure, yield superior outcomes over a longer length of time and require fewer consultations.
Metrics
References
Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores-a review. Quintessence Int 2005;36: 737-46.
Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 2007;86: 729-34.
Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-50.
Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: le composiposte (1). Chirurg Dent France 1990;540:131-141.
Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontics posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278
Drummond JL, Toepke RS, King TJ. Thermal and cycling loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-224.
Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study on 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80: 151-157.
Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-8.
Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36
Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131-6.
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-50.
Silverstein WH. The reinforcement of weakened pulpless teeth. J. Prosthet Dent 1964;14:372-81.
Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:973-86.
Hargreaves, Kenneth M. BLH, Cohen's pathways of the pulp Eleventh Edition. Elsevier; 2016:1143.
Belli S, Eskitascioglu GÜ. Biomechanical properties and clinical use of a polyethylene fibre post-core material. International Dentistry South Africa. 2006;8(3):20-6.