Basic principles of anchorage: a review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20243408Keywords:
Orthodontic treatment, Anchorage, Reciprocal forcesAbstract
During orthodontic treatment, teeth are subjected to various forces and moments, which generate reciprocal forces of equal magnitude but opposite direction. To prevent unwanted tooth movements and ensure successful treatment outcomes, it is essential to effectively manage these reciprocal forces. Numerous studies have explored different anchorage systems in terms of their application, function, and effectiveness. However, practitioners often find it challenging to interpret these findings due to the diversity in study designs, sample sizes, and methodologies. A solid understanding of anchorage principles is crucial for applying them effectively. Anchorage control is a critical factor in designing orthodontic appliances. While extraoral devices can provide stable anchorage, their effectiveness heavily relies on patient cooperation. In contrast, intraoral anchorage tends to be less stable, often necessitating complex appliances and sometimes the extraction of teeth. Nonetheless, intraoral systems have the advantage of requiring less patient compliance. To achieve treatment objectives, it is vital to establish a biomechanical setup that delivers the appropriate type and magnitude of force. This foundational understanding of anchorage principles will enhance the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments.
Metrics
References
Graber TM. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. St Louis, Mississippi: Mosby. 1985.
Proffit WR. Biomechanics and mechanics. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis, Miss: Mosby. 2000.
Nanda R. Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. 1997.
Moyer RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Netherland: Mosby. 1988.
Mclaughlin B, Trevisi. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. 1st ed. UK: Elsevier Health. 2001.
Carriere J. Inverse Anchorage Technique in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment. Quintessence Pub Com Ltd. 1991.
Mulligan TF. Common sense mechanics. J Clin Orthod. 1980;14:180-9.
Begg PR. Orthodontic Therapy &and Technique. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. 1977.
Graber TM, Swain BF. Current Orthodontic Concepts and Technique. 2nd ed. USA: Mosby.1994.
Ricketts RM. Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs. Part II. Am J Orthod. 1976;70(4):359-97.
Burstone CJ, Van Steenbergen E, Hanley KJ. Modern Edgewise Mechanics and The Segmented Arch Technique. Glendora: Ormco. 1995.
Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontic Current Principles and Technique. 2nd ed. USA: Mosby. 1994.
Higley LB. Anchorage in Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1969;55(6):245-8.
Creekmore TD. Where teeth should be positioned in the face and jaws and how to get them there. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31(9):586-608.
Saelens NA, De Smit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(3):225-36.
Bennet JC, McLaughlin RP. Controlled space closure with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1990;24(4):251-60.
Creekmore TD, Eklund M.K. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthodont. 1983;17(4):266-9.
Gray JB, Steen ME, King GJ, Clark AE. Studies on the efficacy of implants as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthodont. 1983;83(4):311-7.
Block MS, Hoffman DR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(3):251-8.
Newman GM, Takei H, Klokkevold RP, Carranza AF. Clinical Periodontology and Implantology. 14th ed. Elsevier. 2023.
Artun J, Urbye KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment of periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93(2):143-8.
Hart A, Taft L, Greenberg SN. The effectiveness of differential moments in establishing and maintaining anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102(5):434-42.
Rajcich MM, Sadowsky C. Efficacy of intra-arch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(2):441-8.
Lotzof LP, Fine HA. Canine retraction: a comparison of two preadjusted bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1996;110(2):191-6.
Williams R, Hosila FJ. The effect of different extraction sites upon incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976;69(4):388-410.