Utility of Papanicolaou test in diagnosis of cervical lesions: a study in a tertiary care centre of western Uttar Pradesh

Mithila Bisht, Shweta Agarwal, Deepak Upadhyay

Abstract


Background: Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among females in India. It is also one of the major causes of deaths among them. Papanicolaou (Pap) cytological test helps in detecting the early epithelial abnormalities in cervical cells. The morbidity and mortality due to cervical cancer has come down in countries with well-established screening programmes at national level. This study was conducted to emphasize the value of cervical screening as a tool for early detection of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of cervix. Slide positivity rate was computed and clinico-pathological correlation was done.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2014 (3 years), on 2202 women aged between 20-70 years coming for a Pap smear examination in a tertiary care hospital in Bareilly, India. After staining with conventional Papanicolaou technique, all cases were classified as per Bethesda nomenclature (2001).

Results: Out of 2202 cases, 85.16% slides were found to be negative for intraepithelial abnormalities and 14.84% slides were labelled as positive for epithelial lesions. 97.67% of high grade lesions were found in women more than 40 years. Smears with epithelial cell abnormality were found more common in older age groups whereas smears negative for epithelial cell abnormality were found more common in young age groups.

Conclusion: Pap test is a cost effective cancer screening and is a simple method to detect various lesions of cervix, non-neoplastic as well as neoplastic. High risk screening programmes should be directed to all women >40 years. Pap test is especially useful to diagnose precancerous lesions of cervix, thereby early detection of these lesions & subsequent proper treatment can be helpful in prevention of cervical cancer.

 


Keywords


Cervical smear, Bethesda system (2001), Pap smear, Screening

Full Text:

PDF

References


Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1941;42:193-206.

Singh P, Ilancheran A. The Pap or cervical smear and the role of colposcopy in screening for carcinoma of the cervix. Singapore Med J. 1989;30:302-5.

WHO. Comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control: a healthier future for girls. In: WHO, eds. WHO Guidance Note. World Health Organization; 2013.

Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw K, Rajkumar R, Shastri S, Wesley R, et al. Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: a summary of completed and ongoingstudies in India. Salud Publica Mex. 2003;45:S399-407.

Jacquiline S, Cristina H, Christopher E. Cervical cancer in developing world. West J Med. 2001;175:231-3.

Anderson GH, Boyes DA, Benedet JL, Le Riche JC, Matisic JP, Suen KC, et al. Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia. Brit Med J. 1988;296:975-8.

Adhikary AK, Banik U, Numaga J, Suzuki E, Inada T, Okabe N. Heterogeneity of the fibre sequence in subgenus C adenoviruses. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:612-7.

Solomon D, Davey D, Kumar R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. Bethesda 2001 workshop. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114-9.

Nandakumar A, Anantha N, Venugopal TC. Incidence, mortality and survival in cancer of the cervix in Bangalore, India. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:1348-52.

Suba EJ, Raab SS. Viet/American cervical cancer prevention project. Papanicolaou screening in developing countries: an idea whose time has come. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121:315-20.

Suba EJ, Raab SS. Lessons learned from successful Papanicolaou cytology cervical cancer prevention in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40:355-66.

Shekhar H, Pancharia A, Chauhan S, Kaur A, Chauhan S. Cytological pattern of cervical Papanicolaou smear in Rajasthan: a screening and diagnostic procedure. Int J Dent Med Res. 2014;1(3):1-7.

Misra JS, Singh U. Results of long-term hospital based cytological screening in asymptomatic women. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:184-7.

Banik U, Bhattacharjee P, Ahamad SU, Rahman Z. Pattern of epithelial cell abnormality in Pap smear: a clinicopathological and demographic correlation. Cytojournal. 2011;8:8.

Neelima T, Navyaa VR. Utility of Pap smear in the diagnosis of various neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesion of cervix. Int J Pharmaceutical Res Bio-Sci. 2012;1:379-89.

Imai A, Matsunami K, Takagi H, Ichigo S. Trend of incidence in positive cervical smears from 2002-2010 in Ningen Dock, a special Japanese health check-up system. Ningen Dock. 2012;26:923-6.

Jena A, Bharathi T, Siva Kumar Reddy YK, Manilal B, Patnayak R, Phaneendra BV. Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening of staff members of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. J Clin Sci Res. 2012;1:174-7.

Graaf YV, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HLJ, Go DMDS. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening. Acta Cytol. 1987;31:434-8.

Murthy NS, Sehgal A, Satyanarayana L, Das DK, Singh V, Das BC, et al. Risk factors related to biological behaviour of precanerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Int J Cancer, 1990;61:732-5.

Mostafa MG, Srivannaboon S, Rachanawutanon M. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2000;43:23-9.

Bhatia R, Goel S, Pal S, Sareen AR. Down staging of carcinoma cervix by Pap smear in high risk women. Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;4:29-36.

Robyr R, Nazeer S, Vassilakos P, Matute JC, Sando Z, Halle G, et al. Feasibility of cytology-based cervical cancer screening in rural Cameroon. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:1110-6.

Kulkarni PR, Rani H, Vimalambike MG, Ravishankar S. Opportunistic screening for cervical cancer in a tertiary hospital in Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5101-5.

Lozowski MS, Mishriki Y, Talebian I, Solitare G. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy of preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 1982;26:285-91.