Clinical outcomes of interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan-guided response-adaptive therapy in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: a tertiary cancer centre experience from South India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20243767Keywords:
HL, iPET-CT, Response-adapted therapy, EFSAbstract
Background: Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable malignancy, but some patients fail standard ABVD chemotherapy, requiring intensified treatment. Interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan (iPET-CT) using the Deauville scoring system allows response-adapted therapy, enabling de-escalation to AVD in good responders and escalation to dose-escalated BEACOPP (EB) in poor responders. This study evaluates iPET-guided therapy outcomes in HL patients at a tertiary care center in South India.
Methods: A retrospective study of 69 HL patients (aged 12-65 years) treated over 5 years was conducted. After two ABVD cycles, iPET-2 scans guided treatment: PET-negative patients (Deauville 1-3) received four additional AVD cycles, while PET-positive patients (Deauville 4-5) received four EB cycles. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), toxicities, and quality of life. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression.
Results: The cohort (median age: 38 years, 87% male) had predominantly advanced-stage disease (73.9%) and systemic B symptoms (81.2%). iPET identified 16% as PET-positive. Median OS was 73 months (95% CI: 67.77-78.23), and median EFS was 30 months (95% CI: 28.64-31.36). PET-negative patients showed significantly better 2-year EFS (81%) compared to PET-positive patients (50%; p<0.05). Toxicities were higher in the EB group, with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 85% of cycles.
Conclusions: iPET-CT-guided therapy effectively stratifies HL patients, improving outcomes in PET-positive poor responders while avoiding overtreatment in PET-negative patients. Despite higher toxicities, escalated BEACOPP was feasible and safe, highlighting the potential of response-adapted strategies in resource-limited settings.
Metrics
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30.
Bonadonna G, Zucali R, Monfardini S, De Lena M, Uslenghi C. Combination chemotherapy of Hodgkin’s disease with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and imidazole carboxamide versus MOPP. Cancer. 1975;36(1):252-9.
Canellos GP, Anderson JR, Propert KJ, Nissen N, Cooper MR, Henderson ES, et al. Chemotherapy of Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP Alternating with ABVD. N Eng J Med. 1992;327(21):1478-84.
Francesco M, Stefano L, Paolo GG, Nicola C, Caterina M, Fiorella I, et al. Long-Term Results of the HD2000 Trial Comparing ABVD Versus BEACOPP Versus COPP-EBV-CAD in Untreated Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(11):1175-81.
Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, Ercole B, Alessandro L, Valeria B, et al. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin’s lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):203-12.
Andreas E, Heinz H, Carsten K, Jana M, Christoph R, Antony H, et al. Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1791-9.
Ganesan P, Kumar L, Raina V, Sharma A, Bakhshi S, Sreenivas V, et al. Hodgkin’s lymphoma--long-term outcome: an experience from a tertiary care cancer center in North India. Ann Hematol. 2011;90(10):1153-60.
Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A, Chauvie S, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, et al. The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):1107-13.
Hasenclever D, Diehl V. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(21):1506-14.
Alden AM, Jane D, Mukesh C, Paul JH, Richard JK, Kerry S, et al. International Prognostic Score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: altered utility in the modern era. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(27):3383-8.
Al-Ibraheem A, Anwer F, Juweid ME, Shagera QA, Khalaf AN, Obeidat S, et al. Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17702.
Zaman MUZ, Fatima N, Zaman A, Zaman U, Zaman S, Tahseen R. Progression Free Survival and Predictor of Recurrence in DLBCL patients with Negative Interim 18FDG PET/CT Using Standardized Imaging and Reporting Protocols. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention. 2020;21(8):2343.
Vassilakopoulos TP, Liaskas A, Patricio P, Panayiotis P, Maria KA, Andrea G. Incorporating Monoclonal Antibodies into the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Internet. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(17):13187.
Deauville five-point scale. Radiology Reference Article. Radiopaedia.org Internet. Available at: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/deauville-five-point-scale. Accessed on 15 September 2024.
Lee JW, Dongryul O, Keun-Yong E, Jin HK, Woo CK, Mi JC, et al. Validation of Deauville Score for Response Evaluation in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020;37(1):125-31.
Linlin H, Yi Z, He J. Application of interim PET-CT in first-line treatment decision-making for lymphoma. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023;24(10):905-921.
Diehl V, Franklin J, Pfreundschuh M, Lathan B, Paulus U, Hasenclever D, et al. Standard and increased-dose BEACOPP chemotherapy compared with COPP-ABVD for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348(24):2386-95.
Von Tresckow B, Stefanie K, Helen G, Paul JB, Thomas P, Michael F, et al. Intensive treatment strategies in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD9 and HD12): analysis of long-term survival in two randomised trials. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(10):e462-73.
Bonfante V, Santoro A, Viviani S, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G. ABVD chemotherapy in the treatment of Hodgkin’s disease. Semin Oncol. 1992;19(2-5):38-44.
Diehl V, Franklin J, Hasenclever D, Tesch H, Pfreundschuh M, Lathan B, et al. BEACOPP, a new dose-escalated and accelerated regimen, is at least as effective as COPP/ABVD in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: interim report from a trial of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(12):3810-21.
Von Tresckow B, Craig M. Treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. Semin Hematol. 2016;53(3):180-5.
Johnson PWM. Response-adapted frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: are we there yet? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016(1):316-22.
Gobbi PG, Cavalli C, Gendarini A, Crema A, Ricevuti G, Federico M, et al. Reevaluation of prognostic significance of symptoms in Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1985;56(12):2874-80.
Breinholt MF, Schejbel L, Gang AO, Nielsen TH, Pedersen LM, Høgdall E. Risk stratification and prognostic biomarkers in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Haematol. 2023;111(4):583-91.
Vassilakopoulos TP, Chatzidimitriou C, Asimakopoulos JV, Arapaki M, Tzoras E, Angelopoulou MK. Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(8):1071.
Friedberg JW, Forero-Torres A, Bordoni RE, Cline VJM, Patel Donnelly D, Flynn PJ, et al. Frontline brentuximab vedotin in combination with dacarbazine or bendamustine in patients aged ≥60 years with HL. Blood. 2017;130(26):2829-37.