Comparison between score recording in traditional method and indigenous technique during evaluation in viva voce

Authors

  • Naresh Dharamrai Balani 1Department of Pharmacology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal-445001, M.H.
  • Narendra Prabhakar Bachewar 1Department of Pharmacology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal-445001, M.H.
  • Ketan Yashwant Asawale 1Department of Pharmacology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal-445001, M.H.

Keywords:

Code conversion (CC) technique, Medical education technology, Practical examination, Viva voce

Abstract

Background: Viva voce which is integral part of practical examination plays important role in evaluation during practical examination in pharmacology. Existing traditional method has disadvantages of subjectivity, less accuracy, no documentary record of performance and is exhaustive for examiners.

Methods: In this study we compared a newly designed code conversion technique with traditional method of viva voce evaluation on second MBBS Pharmacology students. Those appearing for pre-university examination in the department were observed for both the methods of evaluation.

Results: It is observed that there were cases of overvaluation and undervaluation indicating subjectivity in traditional method evaluation while documentary recording and accuracy possible in code conversion technique.

Conclusion: Thus code conversion technique has potential to replace traditional method evaluation as it minimizes all disadvantages of traditional method to make fair and more accurate assessment of students during viva voce part of practical examination. The only drawback of prolonged result complication time can well be adjusted at the university end.

References

Singh NP. Purpose of oral examination in handouts during 31st NTTCP. In: Singh NP, eds. A NTTCP Program. New Delhi: Maulana Azad Medical College; March 1995.

Singh NP. Advantages and disadvantages of oral examination In: Singh NP, eds. Handouts during 31st NTTC. New Delhi: Maulana Azad Medical College; March 1995.

Kocabasoglu YE. How to assess the students? In: Hogerzeil HV, eds. Teacher’s Guide to Good Prescribing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

Chandra D. Evaluation-I: purpose and process. In: Chandra D, eds. Handouts during 31st NTTC. New Delhi: Maulana Azad Medical College; March 1995.

Cobourne MT. What’s wrong with the traditional viva as a method of assessment in orthodontic education? J Orthod. 2010 Jun;37(2):128-33.

Rehana Rehman, Sadiqa Syed, Azhar Iqbal, Rabiya Rehan. Perception and performance of medical students in objective structured practical examination and viva voce. Pak J Physiol. 2012;8(2):33-6.

Tisonova J, Hudec R, Szalayova A, Bozekova L, Wawruch M, Lassanova M, et al. Experience with problem oriented teaching in pharmacology. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2005;106:83-7.

Gamal H. El, Shallaly, Eltayeb A. Ali. Use of video-projected structured clinical examination (vipsce) instead of the traditional oral (viva) examination in the assessment of final year medical students. Educ Health. 2004 Mar;17(1):17-20.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-08

How to Cite

Balani, N. D., Bachewar, N. P., & Asawale, K. Y. (2017). Comparison between score recording in traditional method and indigenous technique during evaluation in viva voce. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(5), 1177–1180. Retrieved from https://www.msjonline.org/index.php/ijrms/article/view/1465

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles