Assessing the severity grading of acute cholecystitis according to Tokyo guidelines 2013 and outcome of conservative management

Authors

  • Asif Iqbal Department of General Surgery, SKIMS Medical College Bemina, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Fozia Hussain Shah Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-I- Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Mubashir Gani Department of General Surgery, SKIMS Medical College Bemina, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Sameer H. Naqash Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-I- Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Mubashir A. Shah Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-I- Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250969

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy, Tokyo guidelines, Cholecystitis, Gall stones

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis is most often triggered by gall stones. Gall stones are one of the most common disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting about 10% of people in Western society.

Methods: This prospective observational was conducted in the department of General Surgery, Sher e Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences and SKIMS Medical College from September 2018 to August 2020 comprising of 112 patients. The severity of cholecystitis according to TG13 was noted. All the patients were managed conservatively. Patients were closely monitored for any change in severity.

Results: A total of 112 patients were studied with male: female ratio of 1:3.5. The maximum number of patients were in the age group of 45 to 59 years with a mean age of 50.3 years, 63.4% of patients were associated with comorbidities. LFT was deranged in only 21.4% of the patients All the patients were assessed for the severity of illness according to the Tokyo guidelines (TG 13). 64 (57.1%) patients had mild illness, 43 patients (38.4%) had moderate illness and 05 patients (4.5%) had severe illness.  84.8% (95) of the patients improved by conservative management.  03 patients belonging to severe grade needed open surgical intervention. 01-patient died in postoperative period.  Most of the patients had a hospital stay of less than 01 week with mean duration of 3.8 days. Most patients with mild to moderate disease were below 60 years. All the grades of severity were more common in females.

Conclusions: Most patients with acute cholecystitis can be managed conservatively.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gallstone Disease: Diagnosis and Management of Cholelithiasis, Cholecystitis and Choledocholithiasis. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. London, 2014

Indar AA, Beckingham IJ. Acute cholecystitis. BMJ 2002; 325:639–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7365.639

Friedman GD. Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Am J Surg 1993; 165:399-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80930-4

Bjorvatn, B. Cholecystitis-etiology treatment-microbiological aspects. Scand J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 1984, 90, 65–70.

Csendes, A., Burdiles, P., Maluenda, F., Diaz, J.C., Csendes, P., Mitru, N. Simultaneous bacteriologic assessment of bile from gallbladder and common bile duct in control subjects and patients with gallstones and common duct stones. Arch. Surg. 1996,131, 389–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160047008

Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirata K, Sekimoto M, et al. Definitions, pathophysiology and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):15-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1152-y

Oates E, Selland DL, Chin CT, Achong DM. Gallbladder non-visualization with pericholecystic rim sign: morphine-augmentation optimizes diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:267-9.

Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The British J Surg. 2010;97(2):141-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6870

Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998;227:461-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001

Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, et al. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:764-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x

Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Rouge C, Duplessis R, Cervi C, Arnaud JP. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs. chronic cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:358-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640020088

Eldar S, Eitan A, Bickel A, Sabo E, Cohen A, Abrahamson J, et al. The impact of patient delay and physician delay on the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 1999;178:303-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00172-5

Norrby S, Herlin P, Holmin T, Sjodahl R, Tagesson C. Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1983;70:163-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800700309

Rao KS, Meghavathu G, Rao S. Prasad T. Clinical study of gallstone disease and treatment options. J of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015;4(79):13841-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/1972

Hermann RE. “Biliary disease in the aging patients”. New York: Masson; 1983: 227-32.

Motiwala HG. Operative technique of cholecystectomy: A study of 250 cases. Macmillan India Limited, 1991; 204.

Ganey JB, Johnson PA, Jr, Prillaman PE, McSwain GR. Cholecystectomy: clinical experience with a large series. Am J Surg. 1986;151(3): 352-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90466-6

Moreaux J. Prospective study of open cholecystectomy for calculous biliary disease. Br J Surg. 1994;81(1):116-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810142

Jayanthi V, Prasanthi R, Surendran R, Palanivelu C. Epidemiology of gall stone disease. BHJ. 2020;5:786-9.

Liu CM, Tung TH, Chou P, Chen VTK, Hsu CT, Chien WS, et al. Clinical correlation of gallstone disease in a Chinese population in Taiwan: Experience at Cheng Hsin General Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(8):1281-61998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1281

Ahn KS, Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY. Use of liver function tests as first-line diagnostic tools for predicting common bile duct stones in acute cholecystitis patients. World J Surg. 2016;40(8):1925-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3517-y

Janssen ERI, Hendriks T, Natroshvili T, Bremers AJA. Retrospective Analysis of Non-Surgical Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020;21(5):428-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2019.261

Komatsu S, Tsuchida S, Wakahara T, Ueno N, Toyokawa A, Watanabe A, et al. Outcomes of Consistent Conservative Management for Acute Cholecystitis Followed by Delayed Cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(5):404-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000458

Busto Bea V, Caro Patón A, Aller de la Fuente R, González Sagrado M, García Alonso FJ, Pérez-Miranda Castillo M. Acute calculous cholecystitis: a real-life management study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019;111(9):667-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2019.6260/2019

Kim D, Iqbal SI, Ahari HK, Molgaard CP, Flacke S, Davison BD. Expanding role of percutaneous cholecystostomy and interventional radiology for the management of acute cholecystitis: An analysis of 144 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018;99(1):15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.04.006

Downloads

Published

2025-03-29

How to Cite

Iqbal, A., Hussain Shah, F., Gani, M., Naqash, S. H., & Shah, M. A. (2025). Assessing the severity grading of acute cholecystitis according to Tokyo guidelines 2013 and outcome of conservative management. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 13(4), 1482–1487. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250969

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles